Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Infraon IMS vs Loom Systems comparison

EverestIMS and ServiceNow are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. EverestIMS is ranked #57, while ServiceNow is ranked #63. EverestIMS holds a 0.3% mindshare in IM, compared to ServiceNow’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of EverestIMS users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of ServiceNow users who would recommend it.
Infraon IMS
Read 8 Infraon IMS reviews
  • 628 Views
  • 446 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Loom Systems
Read 4 Loom Systems reviews
  • 519 Views
  • 343 Comparison Views
80% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Loom Systems and Infraon IMS compete in IT operations management. While Loom Systems is praised for its pricing and support, Infraon IMS emerges as the superior choice because of its comprehensive feature set, which justifies the investment.

Features: Loom Systems provides AI-driven analytics, proactive IT issue resolution, and enhanced operational efficiency. Infraon IMS offers extensive monitoring, advanced automation capabilities, and an integrated IT management approach.

Room for Improvement: Loom Systems could benefit from increased customization options, broader feature coverage, and a more scalable solution. Infraon IMS might improve with a reduction in deployment complexity, enhanced user interface design, and more budget-friendly pricing options for small businesses.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Infraon IMS features a modular deployment model that supports customization and is paired with responsive customer service. Loom Systems, despite its swift deployment methods, uses a standardized implementation approach that may limit customization.

Pricing and ROI: Loom Systems features a lower setup cost, leading to quicker ROI through efficient problem-solving. Infraon IMS demands a higher initial cost but promises a substantial ROI thanks to its vast functionality and comprehensive IT management features.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Infraon IMS vs. Loom Systems Report (Updated: July 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Infraon IMS vs. Loom Systems
July 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Infraon IMS
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
57th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
Network Monitoring Software (86th), Server Monitoring (31st), Cloud Monitoring Software (46th)
Loom Systems
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
63rd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
Anomaly Detection Tools (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Infraon IMS is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Loom Systems is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
 

Featured Reviews

Maharajan S - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides data accuracy for availability and policy harmonization
The reporting capabilities are a challenge and could be improved. We have been trying to connect to it from our help desk ticketing system, because the ticketing system manages asset tracking, which has been a bit challenging for us. Otherwise, they give some reports that are okay, but we do not use them much because we work in the dashboard. This solution is available in SaaS. The reason why we have not gone to SaaS is they do not have a country-specific separation of assets. There are GDPR and other requirements that might require country-specific sensitive information to be filtered as well as other things that need to be taken care of. Normally, if we need to do any compliance, like ISO27000 compliance, they don't have such a report within their system. This kind of report is missing from their SaaS. That is one of the reasons that we have gone to the on-prem version, where I am assured that my data is secure. I can take the report and show it to them from a compliance point of view. However, the moment we go to a SaaS model, I don't have control of the data and where the data is stored. I don't receive any complaints-based reports from the SaaS model.
Read full review
Keerthi Kumar Sangaraju - PeerSpot reviewer
Stable, easy to set up, flexible, and has multiple functionalities, but needs to define priority levels for each incident
What's lacking in Loom Systems is the level of priority for each incident. For example, after implementation and there was a huge impact on the client, and the client comes back to you and says that there's an incident, that there needs to be an immediate resolution for it, you'll see severity one, severity two, etc., in Loom Systems, rather than priority levels. It would be better if the incidents can be defined as low priority, medium priority, or high priority.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It is a stable product. After the initial configuration, you don't have to tweak it much. All systems of Everest IMS work perfectly."
"Our response time is within 30 minutes for any support. This solution provides alerts immediately, so we are within our SLA, giving efficiency to our support."
"We use the solution to automatically trigger processes to help us resolve issues. The whole IT process has been automated, such as trying to map all the users and the escalation process. So, if any issue happens, we get an SMS and WhatsApp of the report. If there is a critical issue this has to be sorted out, like the entire data center being down, then there is an alarm."
"The feature that I like the most and the best part is the customization."
"The most valuable feature is alerting. We get email alerts when a link is down that tell us which device is having a problem."
"The role-based dashboards provide data points and charts and topology diagrams in a single window. It's like a spider web, where the application, connectivity, and everything is defined for each user of those applications."
"The backup, restore, and comparison features are all good."
"Their discovery is very quick and they have a CSV file upload mechanism that allows you to onboard five thousand devices a day."
"What I like best about Loom Systems is that you can use it for infrastructure monitoring. I also like that it's a flexible solution."
"You can develop your own apps within Loom, and they can be configured very simply."
"The solution is absolutely scalable. If an organization needs to expand it out they definitely can."
"The RFS portion of the solution is the product's most valuable feature."
 

Cons

"This solution is available in SaaS. The reason why we have not gone to SaaS is they do not have a country-specific separation of assets. There are GDPR and other requirements that might require country-specific sensitive information to be filtered as well as other things that need to be taken care of. Normally, if we need to do any compliance, like ISO27000 compliance, they don't have such a report within their system. This kind of report is missing from their SaaS. That is one of the reasons that we have gone to the on-prem version, where I am assured that my data is secure."
"There might be some features in other products that are currently not there in Everest IMS and can be included. I have not yet compared it with any other product."
"The graphical view of the topology does not show us all of the connectivity in our network, which is something that could be improved."
"I would like to see an integrated view of Infraon IMS and Infraon Desk. It would be very helpful if that were integrated into the solution."
"The GUI is in need of improvement. It is not drag-and-drop or easy to use."
"I would like to have the option to add a new device or meet with the next release. Right now, it needs to be done from the backend which results in a heavy reliance on R&D."
"We have enquired if there are any possibilities of monitoring non-IPBS devices."
"Email support is a bit slow. Once you drop an email, it takes time."
"The reporting is a bit weak. They should work to improve this aspect of the product."
"What's lacking in Loom Systems is the level of priority for each incident. For example, after implementation and there was a huge impact on the client, and the client comes back to you and says that there's an incident, that there needs to be an immediate resolution for it, you'll see severity one, severity two, etc., in Loom Systems, rather than priority levels. It would be better if the incidents can be defined as low priority, medium priority, or high priority."
"The discovery and mapping still takes a lot of human intervention, it's quite resource heavy,"
"The change management within the solution needs to be improved. There needs to be more process automation."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"If you are looking for the best product with the best price, Infraon is the best product. We evaluated five to six products and finally felt Infraon was better because of the pricing model, especially because it was more flexible."
"I think that the pricing for this solution is reasonable and varies by number of devices."
"We pay for a number of devices on the accounts and since it is on-premises, we pay the maintenance charges for the year."
"The cost model is within our budget. I have less than 180 critical assets, but the moment that I have 1,000 assets, then the license model is totally different. I don't know whether they are capable of handling that kind of a load. They could revisit the licensing model."
"The pricing is reasonable, given the features that they provide."
"Licensing is calculated on a per-user basis."
Information not available
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
16%
Construction Company
13%
Computer Software Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
9%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?
It actually depends on the exact purpose or requirements. Some tools are better for only network devices while others are better from a cloud monitoring or APM monitoring perspective. You can check...
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

Zabbix vs Infraon IMS Logo
Zabbix vs Infraon IMS
Compared 33% of the time
Equinix IBX SmartView vs Infraon IMS Logo
Equinix IBX SmartView vs Infraon IMS
Compared 30% of the time
ManageEngine OpManager vs Infraon IMS Logo
ManageEngine OpManager vs Infraon IMS
Compared 19% of the time
Instana Infrastructure Monitoring vs Infraon IMS Logo
Instana Infrastructure Monitoring vs Infraon IMS
Compared 17% of the time
More Infraon IMS Competitors
Huawei eSight vs Loom Systems Logo
Huawei eSight vs Loom Systems
Compared 38% of the time
SolarWinds NPM vs Loom Systems Logo
SolarWinds NPM vs Loom Systems
Compared 35% of the time
Splunk Observability Cloud vs Loom Systems Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud vs Loom Systems
Compared 28% of the time
More Loom Systems Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Infraon IMS
August 2025
Infraon IMS reportDownload Infraon IMS product report
Buyer's Guide
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
July 2025
Loom Systems reportDownload Loom Systems product report
 

Also Known As

Everest IMS
No data available
 

Overview

Infraon IMS offers network monitoring with real-time dashboards, customizable GUIs, and integrated tools, supporting device management and workflow automation efficiently.

Infraon IMS delivers stable performance with features tailored for easy customization and detailed network management. Users benefit from real-time monitoring through role-based dashboards and integrated ticketing tools. However, improvements in reporting, GUI usability, and AI integration are needed. Challenges include monitoring non-IPBS devices and improving connectivity visibility. Users require seamless Infraon Desk integration, ease of device addition, and enhanced topology views.

What are the key features of Infraon IMS?
  • Stable Performance: Provides consistent network oversight.
  • Customizable Dashboards: Role-based, interactive GUIs for tailored views.
  • Real-Time Monitoring: Comprehensive network visibility and alerts.
  • Workflow Automation: Streamlines operational processes.
  • Configuration Backup: Ensures data integrity and easy recovery.
  • Granular Reporting: Delivers detailed insights and analysis.
  • Intuitive Interface: Enhances user interaction and experience.
  • Quick Device Discovery: Facilitates effective network management.
  • Email Alerts: Keeps users informed on device status.
  • CSV Upload: Manages high-volume device data efficiently.
What benefits do users find in Infraon IMS?
  • Centralized Access: Simplifies firewall and device management.
  • Enhanced IT Management: Improved monitoring of uptime, downtime, and utilization.
  • Flexible Deployment: Support for global locations with cloud and on-premises options.
  • Link Monitoring Automation: Boosts operational efficiency.

In industries like IT infrastructure and data center management, Infraon IMS is utilized for network monitoring and managing key components such as leased lines and firewalls. Its capabilities aid diverse geographical locations in overseeing data centers, offering centralized monitoring and access to critical infrastructure.

EverestIMS
Loom Systems delivers an advanced AI-powered operational analytics platform to predict and prevent problems in the digital business. DevOps & IT teams use Loom for real-time detection and resolution for any type of application, including home-grown. Loom analyzes logs and metrics in all formats, performs smart correlations and root cause analysis to help organizations gain immediate into their environments. Loom stands alone in the industry as an AI platform requiring no prior math knowledge from its operators, leveraging your existing staff to succeed in the digital era. Getting started is easy - zero configuration and data pre-processing needed, so you can stream your data in its raw format.
ServiceNow
 

Sample Customers

Airtel, BSNL, BlackBox Corporation, ACT, Geojit, Canara Bank, Federal Bank, Corporation Bank, Birla Corporation, CESC Limited, Mphasis, GAIL, Udaan, Cowrks, SEBI, PowerGrid, ION, Summit Communications, National Information Technology Center (Nepal), Bhutan National Bank, Servion T, Greenlam, Translab Technologies, CMSIT Services, Nelco, HPCL, Navitas Life Sciences etc. 
Citrix, Amdocs, Sysaid, Hexaware, Effibar, Revtrak, Taptica
Buyer's Guide
Infraon IMS vs. Loom Systems
July 2025
Free Report: Infraon IMS vs. Loom Systems
Find out what your peers are saying about Infraon IMS vs. Loom Systems and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Infraon IMS vs. Loom Systems report.
See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.