No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Infracost vs SQL Server 2022 Standard on Windows 2025 | Support by SupportedImages comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Infracost
Ranking in AWS Marketplace
43rd
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SQL Server 2022 Standard on...
Ranking in AWS Marketplace
434th
Average Rating
10.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Arkajyoti Misra - PeerSpot reviewer
Associate Director at Husk Power Systems
Cloud cost insights have enabled proactive right sizing and predictable infrastructure spend
Infracost is actually a very good product; however, the improvement part could be on the pricing side because the non-free plans are a bit expensive and don't necessarily offset the savings. Feature-wise, I don't have a lot of complaints about this product; it's quite amazing with a good concept. I do think that with AI catching up, tools such as ChatGPT or Codex will be able to do what Infracost does, so they need to come up with something to differentiate their product. I choose that assessment because of the pricing part; if the pricing was much better, since the starter pack is $250 a month, I'm not sure we are always able to save that much every month, making it an expense instead of a saving. The only improvements needed for Infracost are on the pricing part.
Tharun K - PeerSpot reviewer
Software engineer at a outsourcing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Centralized data has supported daily transactions and reporting across all business teams
One area I would like to see improved in SQL Server 2022 Standard on Windows 2025 | Support by SupportedImages is the licensing and feature limitations in the standard edition. Some of the more advanced capabilities are now only available in the Enterprise edition, which can be frustrating when our requirements grow. Another challenge is managing database upgrades and compatibility, particularly when we are moving older applications to a newer environment. We sometimes have to spend extra time testing everything to make sure existing applications continue working properly. I would also appreciate if Microsoft would simplify some of the configuration options and make troubleshooting error messages easier to understand. The product works well for our regular operations, but these improvements would make life easier for our development and DBA teams.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Infracost has positively impacted my organization by enabling us to reduce our cloud bill without impacting performance, achieving at least a 20% reduction in the amount we spend on cloud."
"Infracost has positively impacted my organization by enhancing our engineering team's cost consciousness."
"Infracost has positively impacted my organization by helping me reduce my infrastructure cost and review expenses, and I am able to remove all unnecessary infrastructure."
"The best feature Infracost offers is that the dashboard is very helpful because it is more visual to all stakeholders."
"One of the biggest improvements we have noticed since using SQL Server 2022 Standard on Windows 2025 | Support by SupportedImages is that our applications are easier to maintain, especially when we are releasing updates or making changes to the database."
"Since making the switch to SQL Server 2022 Standard on Windows 2025 | Support by SupportedImages, we've noticed improved customer satisfaction and faster response times."
 

Cons

"Infracost could be improved in terms of processing and the user interface, as there are times that these aspects could be enhanced."
"I think Infracost can be improved by connecting native and cloud practices; we could use some tools according to each cloud, but as a service, Infracost is very helpful."
"I would appreciate some improvements in terms of processing speed, and I would be happy to see a slightly better user interface from my perspective, but everything else is excellent."
"Infracost is actually a very good product; however, the improvement part could be on the pricing side because the non-free plans are a bit expensive and don't necessarily offset the savings."
"One area I would like to see improved in SQL Server 2022 Standard on Windows 2025 | Support by SupportedImages is the licensing and feature limitations in the standard edition."
"If there was one area for improvement I would suggest for SQL Server 2022 Standard on Windows 2025 | Support by SupportedImages, it would be to have a lower price and perhaps some integration with artificial intelligence agents to help improve queries or functions on some tables to reduce performance issues."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AWS Marketplace solutions are best for your needs.
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
43%
Transportation Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Healthcare Company
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Infracost?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that I need to create each resource using the tools as I promote. In many cases, I use Terraform free locally and then Infracost locally in ...
What needs improvement with Infracost?
I think Infracost can be improved by connecting native and cloud practices; we could use some tools according to each cloud, but as a service, Infracost is very helpful. However, in this case, we n...
What is your primary use case for Infracost?
I use Infracost in all my projects. A specific example of how I use Infracost in my projects is that I need to create infrastructure as code using Terraform and then I connect Infracost in the proj...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SQL Server 2022 Standard on Windows 2025 | Support by SupportedImages?
I feel the pricing for SQL Server 2022 Standard on Windows 2025 | Support by SupportedImages is reasonable for what we get, although the overall cost can increase when we add more databases or need...
What needs improvement with SQL Server 2022 Standard on Windows 2025 | Support by SupportedImages?
One area I would like to see improved in SQL Server 2022 Standard on Windows 2025 | Support by SupportedImages is the licensing and feature limitations in the standard edition. Some of the more adv...
What is your primary use case for SQL Server 2022 Standard on Windows 2025 | Support by SupportedImages?
Our main use case for SQL Server 2022 Standard on Windows 2025 | Support by SupportedImages is managing the database that supports our business application. We use it to process daily transactions ...
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Infracost vs. SQL Server 2022 Standard on Windows 2025 | Support by SupportedImages and other solutions. Updated: October 2026.
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.