InfoVista VistaInsight vs ScienceLogic comparison

Read 46 ScienceLogic reviews

11,993 Views
6,236 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

InfoVista VistaInsight

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

InfoVista VistaInsight and ScienceLogic compete in network performance and IT operations management. ScienceLogic has an edge due to its extensive features, making it worth the higher cost for many businesses.

Features: InfoVista VistaInsight focuses on network monitoring, providing powerful analytics and reporting capabilities. It is designed to offer specific solutions for network monitoring challenges. Meanwhile, ScienceLogic provides comprehensive IT infrastructure management, including automated discovery and monitoring, and offers broader integration options, serving as an all-in-one solution for enterprises.

Room for Improvement: InfoVista could enhance its integration options and expand its capabilities beyond strong analytics to cover more aspects of IT operations. It might also seek to streamline its user interface for an improved user experience. ScienceLogic may need to simplify its deployment to minimize the need for customization, focus on reducing its complexity to enable easier use, and provide more flexible pricing models to accommodate different budget levels.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: InfoVista VistaInsight provides an adaptable deployment model and a supportive customer service team, aiding in smoother onboarding. ScienceLogic deployment is straightforward with reliable support, but it may require more customization, making it suitable for businesses with particular needs.

Pricing and ROI: InfoVista VistaInsight positions itself with competitive initial pricing, offering solid ROI for network operations. ScienceLogic may command a higher upfront investment; however, it justifies this through significant long-term ROI due to its versatile functionalities and integrations that improve operational efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed Network Monitoring Software Report (Updated: September 2026).

Network Monitoring Software

Download the complete report

Helped 915,383 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

InfoVista VistaInsight

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

90th

Average Rating

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ScienceLogic

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

22nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (6th), Unified Communications Monitoring (1st), Server Monitoring (9th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (17th), IT Operations Analytics (9th), Cloud Monitoring Software (15th), AIOps (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of InfoVista VistaInsight is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ScienceLogic is 1.4%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
ScienceLogic	1.4%
InfoVista VistaInsight	0.4%
Other	98.2%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Youssef El Hayek

OSS Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

A powerful service that is very stable and scalable

It's a very powerful service, you have to use your training and understand how to work it. After that, it's very easy to collect and to use. It may be hard to use for the administrators. It's like a Ferrari, if you're a very good driver you'll go to 300 but you have to know how to drive it. If you have a Ferrari but you don't know how to use it, it's not going to be good. Also, it's very important to understand what the customer needs to decide on what kind of products you are going to use, and what product and what solution to implement. I would rate the solution nine out of 10.

Read full review

Michael Wenn

CEO / Co-Founder at Aiops ltd

Offers comprehensive monitoring and tool consolidation but integration complexity needs improvement

There is room for improvement in the speed of setting up the service and integrating PowerPacks. Although these prebuilt features are great, there is considerable complexity in bringing them together to create a unified dashboard. Even with many good integrations and deep visibility, the implementation takes time, especially when it doesn't involve these integrations. While some other companies have easier APIs, using this solution demands significant expertise. It's challenging for new customers to implement independently. The implementation speed of non-PowerPack or non-out-of-the-box integrations should be improved. Additionally, the AI automation feature is not yet very rich due to resource constraints supporting a wide platform.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product is excellent."

"My experience with technical support has been perfect."

"The customizable dashboard is my favorite feature because I have everything that matters to me in my role available immediately at sign on, and we can also customize a customer's dashboard view so that from analyst to C-level executive we can give the customer exactly what they want and need to see at sign on."

"It is simple."

"The most valuable features of ScienceLogic are AI and machine learning."

"One of the valuable features is rapid dashboards."

"We lacked the power or features that the EM7 dashboards provide, and have won more than one account based on that alone."

"Since it is a SaaS-based product, the setup is not very difficult."

"The customer service and support has been the best of any vendor I have had experience dealing with in my professional history."

"Technical Support: The best I've ever experienced."

More ScienceLogic pros

Cons

"The presentation of the features can be improved."

"However, the license is expensive."

"The presentation of the features can be improved. It can be more user-friendly for the visual part of the portal and to allow the customer to be able to use."

"It doesn't have the complete application-level topology. It could have service topology and business service monitoring. I would like to see how business service monitoring will function with agent-based installation, and how flexible and business-oriented it is for service modeling and service infrastructure. I have a lot of experience in using business service monitoring, service topology, and service hierarchy functionalities in similar products from BMC and Micro Focus (OpenView), and I want to see how these functionalities will look like in ScienceLogic."

"From a performance perspective, it needs to improve a lot."

"We want to understand: how does the back end work? What if some problem occurs? What we can do? They need to provide more information."

"Overall monitoring capabilities could be improved. We run into instances where we are not able to configure monitoring for specific things and it requires quite a bit of manual labor to accomplish these tasks."

"ScienceLogic could improve the implementation, it could be made easier."

"They should add CLI command modes and scripts for high performance."

"Error information doesn’t have a good information if something goes wrong while doing a device discovery (I tried this a while back- couldn’t be more specific)."

"Reporting needs to be improved. It was sold as a tool we could use for our clients and it was a complete failure."

More ScienceLogic cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The license is expensive."

"The solution is license-based. It's between $8 and $15, depending on what you need from the product."

"The license of ScienceLogic is based on how many endpoints are used. The number of monitoring points you want to have."

"I'm not the best person to discuss pricing, but what I do know is that it's a use-and-go structure. You use this much storage and pay this much for it. That's how it is. Every time, we continue to add a large amount of data to the environment."

"Pricing between the two is quiet large therefore you can save some money if you don't require to collect all info on each device."

"Decide what you want to monitor and only monitor those items. Absorb other elements as you grow."

"Its price could be lower, but for what you pay, you got a lot of value from its features and functionalities. Customers always want a discount or a cheaper solution."

"The pricing model for ScienceLogic could improve."

"Plan for adding more to it. Once you see EM7 in action, you will want to keep adding systems to monitor."

More ScienceLogic pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,383 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

22%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Educational Organization

Manufacturing Company

11%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	27

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ScienceLogic?

ScienceLogic is not that expensive and is cost-effective overall.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ScienceLogic?

I am interested in improving the flexibility of ScienceLogic's user interface, configuration, and customization. I am particularly keen on learning about issues raised by the ScienceLogic support t...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ScienceLogic?

Our usual use case of ScienceLogic is as a strategic monitoring tool for all the customers in our company, and because of that reason, all the accounts and projects are migrated from other monitori...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs InfoVista VistaInsight

Compared 13% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs InfoVista VistaInsight

Compared 11% of the time

ObserverLIVE vs InfoVista VistaInsight

Compared 6% of the time

LiveNX vs InfoVista VistaInsight

Compared 4% of the time

DX NetOps vs InfoVista VistaInsight

Compared 4% of the time

More InfoVista VistaInsight Competitors

LogicMonitor vs ScienceLogic

Compared 5% of the time

Datadog vs ScienceLogic

Compared 4% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs ScienceLogic

Compared 3% of the time

Nagios XI vs ScienceLogic

Compared 3% of the time

Dynatrace vs ScienceLogic

Compared 3% of the time

More ScienceLogic Competitors

Product Reports

Network Monitoring Software

Download InfoVista VistaInsight product report

Download ScienceLogic product report

Also Known As

VistaInsight

No data available

Overview

InfoVista VistaInsight provides network performance monitoring with comprehensive capabilities for enterprises. It ensures efficient management and optimization of network resources, delivering insights that enhance operational efficiency.

InfoVista VistaInsight offers advanced analytics and reporting to help businesses optimize their networks. Designed for IT professionals, it enables proactive monitoring and detailed reports tailored to different industry needs. Flexible and scalable, it supports effective network management, contributing to improved customer satisfaction and reduced downtime. Organizations benefit from real-time visibility into system performance, facilitating strategic decision-making and resource allocation.

What are the key features of InfoVista VistaInsight?

Performance Analytics: Provides detailed performance data for both local and global networks, ensuring better decision-making.
Scalability: Adapts to growing network demands, supporting efficient management as organizations expand.
Custom Reporting: Offers customizable reports to fit specific requirements, enhancing actionable insights.
Real-Time Monitoring: Delivers instant visibility into network status, allowing for quick response to any issues.
Automation Capabilities: Increases efficiency through automation, reducing manual intervention and errors.

What benefits or ROI should users consider?

Operational Efficiency: Increases efficiency by streamlining network operations, reducing complexity and costs.
Resource Optimization: Helps better allocate resources, maximizing output and minimizing wastage.
Downtime Reduction: Minimizes downtime through proactive issue identification, ensuring continuous operations.
Strategic Decision-Making: Enhances decisions with accurate, timely data, improving overall strategic outcomes.
Customer Satisfaction: Improves user experience by maintaining high network performance standards.

InfoVista VistaInsight is used in telecommunications, financial services, and healthcare industries to monitor and optimize network performance. In telecommunications, it ensures seamless service delivery, while in finance, it protects transaction integrity. Healthcare providers use it to maintain critical service reliability, enhancing patient care.

Infovista

ScienceLogic excels in customizable dashboards, seamless integrations, and real-time data analysis, supporting diverse IT environments with multi-tenant capabilities.

ScienceLogic provides robust infrastructure and network monitoring, catering to cloud, applications, and server environments. It supports hybrid setups, integrating with CMDB and ticketing systems while automating incident management. ScienceLogic's PowerPacks eliminate visibility gaps and its adaptable nature supports modern and legacy systems. Offering agentless monitoring, it ensures efficient operations with scalable infrastructure support and detailed reporting. However, the interface complexity and need for professional support can present usability challenges. Enhancements in reporting, application coverage, API support, and customization are desirable for improved user experience.

What are ScienceLogic's most important features?

Customizable Dashboards: Tailor views for precise monitoring across different environments.
PowerPacks: Extensive device integrations reduce visibility gaps.
Real-time Data Analysis: Enables quick decision-making with up-to-date insights.
Seamless Integration: Compatible with multiple platforms to unify IT systems.
Adaptive Infrastructure: Supports both modern and legacy systems with ease.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Operational Efficiency: Automates event management and simplifies monitoring tasks.
Scalable Support: Grows with the organizational needs, accommodating larger infrastructures.
Comprehensive Reports: Provides complete oversight for informed strategic planning.
Enhanced Adaptability: Unifies diverse technological environments efficiently.

ScienceLogic is often implemented across industries requiring detailed attention to infrastructure and network monitoring. It finds utility in managing hybrid environments, integrating seamlessly with essential systems like CMDB and ticketing platforms. Its scalability and adaptability are valued in unifying complex, diverse environments under one monitoring platform.

Sample Customers

Ooredoo Tunisia

Kellogg Company, Booz Allen, Cisco, Red Bull, Fidelus, Telstra, Comcast, CSC, Peak 10, HughesNet, Hosting, Datapipe, US Army, Equinix, Rite Aid, Carbonite, Sybase, Carpathia, AT&T, ePlus, Dimension Data, Virtustream, Boeing, Honeywell

Network Monitoring Software