![Informatica PowerExchange [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_64/gaXfZsz7e51ho14qsm4PpcUN.jpg?_a=BACAGSDL)
Informatica PowerExchange and Qlik Replicate compete in the data integration and management category. Informatica appears to have the upper hand in transformation capabilities, while Qlik Replicate excels in ease of use and data replication efficiency.
Features: Informatica PowerExchange offers real-time integration, flexibility with Change Data Capture (CDC), and robust transformation capabilities. It is preferred in complex data ecosystems due to its broad data management functions. Qlik Replicate is known for its ease of use, efficient CDC features, and ability to handle data replication without impacting source databases, making it ideal for rapid analytics and diverse endpoint support.
Room for Improvement: Informatica PowerExchange faces challenges with high availability, real-time data processing, and integration with certain cloud platforms. Users seek better ease of use and enhanced support. Qlik Replicate could improve in error messaging, complex transformations, and API flexibility, with noted issues in licensing transparency and performance tuning.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Informatica PowerExchange is mainly deployed on-premises and customer service has mixed reviews with concerns about response times. Qlik Replicate offers deployment flexibility across hybrid environments, with varied experiences in technical support response times, making it inconsistent for some users.
Pricing and ROI: Informatica PowerExchange is considered expensive with a capacity-based licensing model but offers ROI through enhanced transformation and reduced expenses. Qlik Replicate, though costly especially for smaller businesses, provides a machine capacity-based licensing model and delivers value with improved decision-making capabilities, though some find it inefficient.
It is considered cost-efficient because it leads to the re-utilization of channels and platforms, which saves time and money.
I conducted a cost comparison with the AWS service provider, and this option is much cheaper than the Kinesis service offered by AWS.
Customers have seen ROI with Qlik Replicate because they get their data for analysis faster, enabling quicker decision-making compared to traditional data sourcing methods.
Their support aligns with what I have experienced with Informatica data quality teams, and it is quite effective.
Informatica's technical support team is very supportive and provides help whenever required.
The support was good enough, and they were able to resolve all the issues I raised in the past.
Even priority tickets, which should be resolved in minutes, can take days.
Support response times could be improved as there are sometimes delays in receiving replies to support cases.
The system could be scaled to include more sources and functions.
Technical errors sometimes occur, such as network breakages at the source level, which breaks connectivity.
One area that could be improved is performance, as PowerExchange sometimes has less performance compared to native connectors when dealing with a huge volume of data.
The addition of data quality dashboards or measures would also help in profiling data to assess its health before sharing or moving it.
It is a core-based licensing, which, especially in the banking industry, results in the system capacity being utilized up to a maximum of 60%.
Currently, there are limited transformations available in Qlik Replicate which could be expanded.
Informatica PowerExchange is considered cost-efficient due to reduced number of APIs needed.
The pricing and cost depend heavily on SAP's licensing structure, especially if using SAP integration services.
Licensing is calculated based on the machine's total capacity rather than actual usage.
For Qlik Replicate, the setup cost includes the requirement of a server, which represents the hardware cost that must be covered.
It also reduces the number of APIs needed for new integrations by offering a unified exchange platform.
The primary advantage of Informatica PowerExchange is being able to extract data from source systems that Informatica does not natively support.
PowerExchange is one of the best software solutions to build integrations with non-Oracle or standard database services, especially for SAP and Hana products.
The most valuable feature of Qlik Replicate is their change data capture feature.
Data retrieved from the system can be pushed to multiple places, supporting various divisions such as marketing, loans, and others.
![Informatica PowerExchange [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_40/gaXfZsz7e51ho14qsm4PpcUN.jpg?_a=BACAGSDL){kind=small}
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 8 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 12 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 10 |
![Informatica PowerCenter vs Informatica PowerExchange [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_30/gaXfZsz7e51ho14qsm4PpcUN.jpg?_a=BACAGSDL){kind=small}
![Oracle GoldenGate vs Informatica PowerExchange [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_30/W9sUSQbZMrpdCc14VywpcNpo.jpeg?_a=BACAGSDL){kind=small}
![SharePlex vs Informatica PowerExchange [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_30/gx7fdc2s39xboxn6pa3oukdu9s75.png?_a=BACAGSDL){kind=small}
![SSIS vs Informatica PowerExchange [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_30/GqfBeX9zWxZG3rC5hyrUo9Aq.jpeg?_a=BACAGSDL){kind=small}
Informatica PowerExchange [EOL] offers advanced data integration capabilities, emphasizing data transformation, real-time integration, and connectivity to diverse data sources, ensuring seamless access and management of big data in complex environments.
Informatica PowerExchange [EOL] is a robust tool for managing data integration and transformation processes. It supports connectivity to numerous sources, enabling real-time data capture and transformation. With native connectors and APIs, it allows seamless integration, ensuring data mapping across data formats. While strong at data handling and integration, improvements in pricing, real-time processing, and enhanced technical support are necessary. Expanded cloud integration and improved high availability will further bolster its efficiency in managing extensive datasets, supporting ETL, and integrating systems like SAP.
What are the most important features of Informatica PowerExchange?Informatica PowerExchange [EOL] is implemented widely in sectors requiring robust data integration solutions. It serves industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail, facilitating the creation of data warehouses and lakes. Used for ETL processes and operational analytics, it integrates systems like Hadoop, Oracle, and legacy environments, driving efficient communication and information sharing.
Qlik Replicate is a data replication solution for replicating data from one source database to another for business intelligence software. It offers data manipulation and transformations, replication without impacting source databases, and ease of use without needing ETL. The solution is stable and user-friendly, with detailed logging and support.
Qlik Replicate has improved the organization by allowing each team to replicate their data into a single-source data location. The most important feature of Qlik Replicate is its ability to replicate and update records without needing a programmer.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
![Informatica PowerExchange [EOL] vs. Qlik Replicate report](https://www.peerspot.com/assets/media/images/icons/pdf-c33db68f.svg){kind=icon}
