Informatica PowerExchange [EOL] vs Qlik Compose comparison

Informatica and Qlik are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Additionally, 90% of Informatica users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of Qlik users who would recommend it.

Informatica PowerExchange [...

Read 23 Informatica PowerExchange [EOL] reviews

90% willing to recommend

Qlik Compose

Read 12 Qlik Compose reviews

1,724 Views
1,500 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Informatica PowerExchange [...

Qlik Compose

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 15, 2026

Informatica PowerExchange [EOL] and Qlik Compose compete in the data management category. Informatica appears to have an upper hand due to its extensive data connectivity and integration capabilities, while Qlik is preferred for its strong data modeling and automation features.

Features: Informatica offers wide-ranging data connectivity, advanced transformation with pushdown optimization, and integration support for various data formats. Qlik Compose excels in data modeling, provides automation capabilities, and enables easy data mart creation with minimal code.

Room for Improvement: Informatica needs to address high pricing and integration complexities, improve real-time processing and cloud platform integrations, and bolster support services. Qlik Compose could enhance scalability, data transformation for high-volume operations, and simplify initial setup with better documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Informatica supports on-premises, cloud, and hybrid deployments, but receives mixed reviews on customer service responsiveness. Qlik offers on-premises and cloud options with average support, noted for occasional response delays.

Pricing and ROI: Informatica is seen as cost-efficient despite high prices due to reduced development and training costs and noteworthy ROI from digital transformation efficiencies. Qlik Compose, although considered expensive, is recognized for providing ROI through enhanced decision-making and streamlined data processes.

To learn more, read our detailed Data Integration Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Data Integration

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,656 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Informatica PowerExchange [...

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Qlik Compose

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (47th)

Featured Reviews

Haider-AlAmeed

Sr. IT & Data Governance and Management Consultant & Technical Lead at a government with 51-200 employees

Facilitates seamless data exchange for Middle Eastern government entities while reducing costs and simplifying integration processes

Informatica PowerExchange is important for services and common services implementations. This allows workflow communication between different entities, providing proper services. The tool's governance features include HA rules, responsibilities, and policies which are highly valued. It also reduces the number of APIs needed for new integrations by offering a unified exchange platform that facilitates easy-to-use services without the need for coding.

Read full review

Sahil Taneja

Principal Consultant/Manager at Tenzing

Easy matching and reconciliation of data

The initial setup was easy for the data warehousing concept. But for a person who is new to ETL and warehousing concepts, it may take some time. If someone is familiar with these concepts, they could understand and learn the tool quickly. However, compared to other tools, the UI is complex. It would be helpful to have a better UI and documentation for new users. As of now, there is a challenge in learning the Compose tool for new users altogether. Qlik Compose was deployed on-premises. But the servers, like the SQL servers were maintained on the cloud—the managed instances.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Provides a significant amount of control over the landscape and overall implementation."

"Overall, it's a good tool. It's currently number one on the market. It pretty much has all the necessary capabilities to pull the incremental data from the source system, technically speaking."

"The product's initial setup phase was not complex. The tool is easy to install onto any of the servers, and you can integrate it."

"In terms of the return on investment, the tool is very helpful in the digital transformation process since multiple systems are available."

"PowerExchange is one of the best software solutions to build integrations with non-Oracle or standard database services, especially for SAP and Hana products."

"It is a scalable and versatile solution."

"The most valuable feature is connectivity to data sources."

"I rate Informatica PowerExchange a ten out of ten."

More Informatica PowerExchange [EOL] pros

"It can scale."

"The most valuable is its excellence as a graphical data representation tool and the versatility it offers, especially with drill-down capabilities."

"Qlik Compose is good enough. It is user-friendly and intuitive."

"There were many valuable features, such as extracting any data to put in the cloud. For example, Qlik was able to gather data from SAP and extract SAP data from the platforms."

"I have found it to be a very good, stable, and strong product."

"As long as you pick the solution that best fits with your requirements, you won't find that performance is a problem. It's good."

"One of the most valuable features of this tool is its automation capabilities, allowing us to design the warehouse in an automated manner. Additionally, we can generate Data Lifecycle Policies (DLP) reports and efficiently implement updates and best practices based on proven design patterns."

"The technical support is very good. I rate the technical support a ten out of ten."

More Qlik Compose pros

Cons

"The product's high costs can be an area of concern where improvements are required."

"It would be helpful to have more metadata provided, which is useful for engaging more users in data exchange."

"Should diversify more, maybe with a reporting and visualization utility,"

"The solution needs better integration with other tools."

"Apache Spark has a machine learning algorithm, an area where Informatica PowerExchange lacks."

"Real-time has not been enhanced that much over the past few years. There has not been as many features added like they did before."

"The solution could be made more user-friendly. The configurations are also quite difficult."

"The one place where it could be improved is definitely pricing. That's a very big problem. It depends product to product, but pricing is an issue."

More Informatica PowerExchange [EOL] cons

"The solution has room for improvement in the ETL. They have an ETL, but when it comes to the monitoring portion, Qlik Compose doesn't provide a feature for monitoring."

"I'd like to have access to more developer training materials."

"There is some scope for improvement around the documentation, and a better UI would definitely help."

"My issues with the solution's stability are owing to the fact that it has certain bugs causing issues in some functionalities that should be working."

"For more complex work, we are not using Qlik Compose because it cannot handle very high volumes at the moment. It needs the same batching capabilities that other ETL tools have. We can't batch the data into small chunks when transforming large amounts of data. It tries to do everything in one shot and that's where it fails."

"It would be better if the first level of technical support were a bit more technically knowledgeable to solve the problem. I think they could also improve the injection of custom scripts. It is pretty difficult to add additional scripts. If the modeling doesn't give you what you want, and you want to change the script generated by the modeling, it is a bit more challenging than in most other products. It is very good with standard form type systems, but if you get a more complicated data paradigm, it tends to struggle with transforming that into a model."

"Qlik's ETL and data transformation could be better."

"When processing data from certain tables with a large volume of data, we encounter significant delays. For instance, when dealing with around one million records, it typically takes three to four hours. To address this, I aim to implement performance improvements across all tables, ensuring swift processing similar to those that are currently complete within seconds. The performance issue primarily arises when we analyze the inserts and updates from the source, subsequently dropping the table. While new insertions are handled promptly, updates are processed slowly, leading to performance issues. Despite consulting our Qlik vendors, they were unable to pinpoint the exact cause of this occurrence. Consequently, I am seeking ways to optimize performance within Qlik Compose, specifically concerning updates."

More Qlik Compose cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"An annual package license fee is required."

"There are licensing and connector costs. Basically, Informatica is pay-as-you-use."

"The product is not very expensive."

"It's expensive. In fact, nobody would buy any product of Informatica if the price was the only consideration. It costs money, and it doesn't come cheap, but it provides value for money in many ways."

"The cost of PowerExchange is reasonable. It does not rely on complicated formulas or unrealistic equations. The pricing model is straightforward. There is one component, and real-time integration is included. Some other solutions require purchasing additional modules or third-party plugins for this capability."

"Many users don't prefer to use the product, considering the high costs attached to the licensing part of the solution."

"There is a need to pay towards the licensing cost of the product. It is an expensive product."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is very expensive, I rate the solution a six."

"The price of the solution is expensive."

"While they outperform Tableau, there's room for improvement in Qlik's pricing structures, especially for corporate clients like us."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,656 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

23%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Marketing Services Firm

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	12

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Informatica PowerExchange?

The product’s flexibility is valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Informatica PowerExchange?

Informatica PowerExchange is considered cost-efficient due to reduced number of APIs needed, enabling re-utilization of existing channels, cutting down on development and training costs.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Informatica PowerExchange?

It would be helpful to have more metadata provided, which is useful for engaging more users in data exchange. The addition of data quality dashboards or measures would also help in profiling data t...

See all answers

Which ETL tool would you recommend to populate data from OLTP to OLAP?

There are two products I know about * TimeXtender : Microsoft based, Transformation logic is quiet good and can easily be extended with T-SQL , Has a semantic layer that generates metat data for cu...

See all answers

Comparisons

Informatica PowerCenter vs Informatica PowerExchange [EOL]

Compared 16% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Informatica PowerExchange [EOL]

Compared 10% of the time

Qlik Talend Cloud vs Informatica PowerExchange [EOL]

Compared 8% of the time

IBM InfoSphere Information Server vs Informatica PowerExchange [EOL]

Compared 7% of the time

SharePlex vs Informatica PowerExchange [EOL]

Compared 6% of the time

More Informatica PowerExchange [EOL] Competitors

Qlik Replicate vs Qlik Compose

Compared 13% of the time

Qlik Talend Cloud vs Qlik Compose

Compared 10% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Qlik Compose

Compared 9% of the time

WhereScape RED vs Qlik Compose

Compared 7% of the time

Airbyte Cloud vs Qlik Compose

Compared 6% of the time

More Qlik Compose Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Informatica PowerExchange [EOL]

March 2026

Download Informatica PowerExchange [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Compose

February 2026

Download Qlik Compose product report

Also Known As

PowerExchange, Connectors

Compose, Attunity Compose

Overview

Informatica PowerExchange [EOL] offers advanced data integration capabilities, emphasizing data transformation, real-time integration, and connectivity to diverse data sources, ensuring seamless access and management of big data in complex environments.

Informatica PowerExchange [EOL] is a robust tool for managing data integration and transformation processes. It supports connectivity to numerous sources, enabling real-time data capture and transformation. With native connectors and APIs, it allows seamless integration, ensuring data mapping across data formats. While strong at data handling and integration, improvements in pricing, real-time processing, and enhanced technical support are necessary. Expanded cloud integration and improved high availability will further bolster its efficiency in managing extensive datasets, supporting ETL, and integrating systems like SAP.

What are the most important features of Informatica PowerExchange?

Data Transformation: Facilitates complex data mappings across formats.
Diverse Connectivity: Connects to multiple data sources, including non-native systems.
Real-Time Integration: Offers real-time data capture and processing capabilities.
Pushdown Optimization: Enhances performance by leveraging native database capabilities.
Change Data Capture: Supports incremental data updates, improving data freshness.

What benefits should be considered?

Scalability: Handles big data volumes efficiently, allowing for future growth.
Workflow Communication: Governance features streamline workflows and reduce API dependence.
Integration Flexibility: Supports integration with SAP and Hana, improving data management.
Fast Updates: Provides timely updates to integrated systems, enhancing decision-making.

Informatica PowerExchange [EOL] is implemented widely in sectors requiring robust data integration solutions. It serves industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail, facilitating the creation of data warehouses and lakes. Used for ETL processes and operational analytics, it integrates systems like Hadoop, Oracle, and legacy environments, driving efficient communication and information sharing.

Informatica

Qlik Sense is a powerful business intelligence tool that offers a range of features to help organizations make faster and more informed decisions. Its primary use cases include operational and financial dashboards, self-service reporting, and centralized access to cross-functional reports. The solution is praised for its mobile platform, ease of use, data-sharing capabilities, and extensibility.

Qlik Sense has helped organizations improve data literacy, reduce time consumed in complex reports, and provide widely available MI to senior stakeholders. It also enables self-service analytics, improves data quality and governance, enhances collaboration, and reduces costs.

Qlik

Sample Customers

ACH Food, BNSF Railway Company, Illinois State University

Poly-Wood

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Qlik and others in Data Integration. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,656 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.