We performed a comparison between Informatica Cloud Data Integration and Mule Anypoint Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Informatica Cloud Data Integration is stable."
"The solution provides increased efficiency while still being user-friendly and easy to operate."
"The solution is straightforward."
"Informatica Cloud Data Integration is stable."
"The features I find most valuable is the synchronization, verification, functionalities and all the data integration features."
"The program is stable and scalable."
"The user interface which is very easy to use if we have any problems to solve."
"Data integration is the most valuable feature. The ability to connect to any of the sources and enterprise applications makes our lives easier."
"The ability to define multi-tiered APIs and reuse them is a fantastic platform feature."
"We are very satisfied with the DevOps support."
"The exchange and API management features are the best in the market."
"The product is very user-friendly."
"It's easy to develop APIs."
"The solution's market place for different kinds of integration platforms is the most valuable feature."
"It has improved our organization a lot because of the increase in productivity, and it has simplified the development of products. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is a highly effective tool where you can build integrations so effectively. If you establish the integration platform, it increases productivity. It helps us to do effective re-authentication, and it speeds the integration."
"MuleSoft Anypoint Platform's most valuable features are its observability and stability."
"There are a small number of UI bugs that occur on occasion."
"Informatica Cloud Data Integration could improve the price by making it less expensive."
"A general improvement in icons and the virtual interface would be good."
"Error reporting and debugging need improvement."
"One area that needs to improve is the user experience because it is very complex. The trial version is very complex so it's not easy to start using the program immediately. You must study the rules first."
"The price modeling could be more flexible."
"There may be some types of limitations with the performance."
"Its pricing model can be improved. The response time from technical support can also be improved."
"The pricing can be a little bit less."
"The price could be improved."
"This becomes an expensive solution over time."
"The solution's licensing methodologies could be improved."
"Its documentation needed a little bit of work to make it more usable. It is a platform that is used mainly by developers and other people for connecting systems. Its documentation was confusing in some areas and was not very helpful in other areas. I had to go to a consultant to get some work done, which ideally shouldn't be required."
"It should give better control over account management."
"It has different types of subscriptions. For platinum or lower subscriptions, there are not too many things that can be done. We don't see many features. They should release a basic version that has logging and monitoring features. These features should come with Mule Anypoint Platform for free instead of making customers pay separately for these features. Its dashboard can be improved to have a lot of charts so that it is easy to visualize information. The utilization part can be improved. The dashboard is good currently, but it can be better. Other solutions like Elastic have a good dashboard, and they allow you to administer the product from the UI. Currently, for RTF, there is a different dashboard or utility. It would be good to include the same utility in the cloud solution. It would be good if there is a centralized repository that includes the links to the information about various troubleshooting issues. The documentation is there currently, and it is good, but the troubleshooting information is too scattered. We have to go to different links to find troubleshooting information. This kind of centralized repository would be helpful for new customers who are implementing this solution. It will be helpful to see different kinds of issues that can occur."
"One area we'd like to see improvement in is the error logging and troubleshooting process."
More Informatica Cloud Data Integration Pricing and Cost Advice →
Informatica Cloud Data Integration is ranked 5th in Cloud Data Integration with 40 reviews while Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 3rd in Cloud Data Integration with 40 reviews. Informatica Cloud Data Integration is rated 7.8, while Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Informatica Cloud Data Integration writes "A stable, scalable, and user-friendly solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations". Informatica Cloud Data Integration is most compared with Informatica PowerCenter, Azure Data Factory, AWS Glue, Fivetran and Matillion ETL, whereas Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SAP Process Orchestration and Mule ESB. See our Informatica Cloud Data Integration vs. Mule Anypoint Platform report.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.