IT Central Station is now PeerSpot: Here's why

Infogram vs Tableau comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Infogram Logo
167 views|143 comparisons
Tableau Logo
Read 105 Tableau reviews.
41,121 views|32,694 comparisons
Featured Review
Buyer's Guide
Reporting Tools
May 2022
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Tableau, Oracle and others in Reporting Tools. Updated: May 2022.
597,291 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The company chose to purchase a creator license for me, which was $70. With that license, you can also be an administrator. We also have 20-25 extra licenses and they cost around $20-$35 each. Those are for normal users who will be viewing the dashboards. Those are monthly charges."
  • "The cost of the solution should be improved."
  • "It is reasonable and cheap as compared to other major tools. It has a good price, and people go for it because of its pricing."
  • "Pricing is not bad. It's competitive."
  • "At $70 per month, I think the price is a bit scary. I have a small consulting firm in Ghana, working in about 15 different African countries, and when it comes to our part of the world, $70 a month is a lot of money for software."
  • "The professional version of Tableau is quite expensive."
  • "It is a bit difficult for some people when they hear $70.00 per month, as some solutions are available for less than $10.00 or for free."
  • "The solution is very expensive. If you have many users then it is going to cost your company a lot of money."
  • More Tableau Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Reporting Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    597,291 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparison Review
    Guillermo (Bill) Cabiro
    I do use both Tableau and QlikView. Although very different, I really like both solutions. They belong to the new BI generation known as Interactive Visual Analytics. In my opinion, QlikView has a more intuitive interface for regular users or executives that are not technical experts but the development side is a little more complex. Up to version 12 QlikView did not provide drag & drop features. If a user wanted to see something not included in the application the new object had to be created by a power user or developer because Qlikview's scripting has somewhat of a learning curve. On the positive side, QlikView's scripting is a great asset as it functions as an ETL allowing the integration of hundreds of different data sources into the same visual app. Another feature that’s extremely useful is Qlik’s proprietary Associative Model that allows the users to visualize data relationships that exist as well as those that do not. Tableau on the other hand is a lot easier to use for developers, analysts or power users who need to connect, manipulate and visualize data rather quickly. While this makes Tableau a better fit for the more analytical crowd, it may not be as appealing or intuitive to the regular or casual business users as QlikView is. Tableau has full pivot, drag & drop and drill down capabilities that are great for developers or power users. They can rotate measures and dimensions and graph them instantly using visualization best practices as suggested by… Read more →
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer: 
    It depends on the Data architecture and the complexity of your requirement. Some great tools in the market are Qlik Sense, Power BI, OBIEE, Tableau, etc. I have recently started using Cognos… more »
    Top Answer: 
    Tableau is easy to set up and maintain. In about a day it is possible for the entire platform to be deployed for use. This relatively short amount of time can make all the difference for companies… more »
    Top Answer: 
    I consider Tableau to be the best analytical tool available. It's really handy to use and can be used by non-technical people.
    Ranking
    37th
    out of 49 in Reporting Tools
    Views
    167
    Comparisons
    143
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    2nd
    out of 49 in Reporting Tools
    Views
    41,121
    Comparisons
    32,694
    Reviews
    101
    Average Words per Review
    585
    Rating
    8.1
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Tableau Desktop, Tableau Server, Tableau Online
    Learn More
    Overview

    Infogram helps people create interactive, multi-page reports. With Infogram, you have access to designer reporting templates, 40+ chart types, easy data imports and uploads, and a wide variety of publishing options.

    Tableau helps people and organizations become more data-driven as the trusted leader in analytics.

    The Tableau platform provides the breadth and depth of capabilities to serve the needs of even the largest global enterprises in a seamless, integrated experience. Tableau is designed to fit, not dictate your data strategy, and adapts to your environment with unmatched flexibility and choice, while meeting the toughest governance and security requirements.

    People love using Tableau because it is both powerful and intuitive—and offers a fundamentally different user experience by empowering people of all skill levels to explore and analyze data using visuals and natural language. Tableau has become the standard language of analytics for modern business users and continues to lead the industry with the most passionate and engaged user community in analytics, a customer base with millions of users at more than 80,000 organizations, and a deep commitment to customer-focused innovation

    Evaluation Guide: How to choose the right BI & analytics platform

    Redefining the role of IT in modern BI world

    Offer
    Learn more about Infogram
    Learn more about Tableau
    Sample Customers
    Goodyear, MSN, Skyscanner, Politico, Washington Examiner, Fairfax Media, Euronews, LinkedIn, Symantec
    Accenture, Adobe, Amazon.com, Bank of America, Charles Schwab Corp, Citigroup, Coca-Cola Company, Cornell University, Dell, Deloitte, Duke University, eBay, Exxon Mobil, Fannie Mae, Ferrari, French Red Cross, Goldman Sachs, Google, Government of Canada, HP, Intel, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Macy's, Merck, The New York Times, PayPal, Pfizer, US Army, US Air Force, Skype, and Walmart.
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Healthcare Company8%
    Energy/Utilities Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company23%
    Comms Service Provider15%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Government7%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise52%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise60%
    Buyer's Guide
    Reporting Tools
    May 2022
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Tableau, Oracle and others in Reporting Tools. Updated: May 2022.
    597,291 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Infogram is ranked 37th in Reporting Tools while Tableau is ranked 2nd in Reporting Tools with 105 reviews. Infogram is rated 0.0, while Tableau is rated 8.2. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tableau writes "Lets me train new users quickly, easily, and intuitively". Infogram is most compared with Google Data Studio and Microsoft BI, whereas Tableau is most compared with Microsoft BI, SAP Analytics Cloud, MicroStrategy, Amazon QuickSight and SAS Visual Analytics.

    See our list of best Reporting Tools vendors and best Data Visualization vendors.

    We monitor all Reporting Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.