Inflectra Rapise vs Telerik Test Studio comparison

Inflectra and Progress Software are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Inflectra is ranked #20 with an average rating of 4.0, while Progress Software is ranked #26. Inflectra holds a 0.7% mindshare in TAt, compared to Progress Software’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Inflectra users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Progress Software users who would recommend it.

Inflectra Rapise

Read 7 Inflectra Rapise reviews

864 Views
311 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Telerik Test Studio

Read 5 Telerik Test Studio reviews

1,219 Views
622 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Inflectra Rapise

Telerik Test Studio

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 11, 2025

Inflectra Rapise and Telerik Test Studio are competing in the software testing automation market. Telerik Test Studio seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set and enhanced functionality, despite higher costs.

Features: Inflectra Rapise provides cross-browser testing, integrated test management, and an easy-to-use recording function. Telerik Test Studio offers extensive UI testing, robust automation tools, and PDF validation, making it ideal for advanced testing needs.

Room for Improvement: Inflectra Rapise could improve its advanced testing features for complex scenarios, enhance its UI, and offer more detailed documentation. Telerik Test Studio may benefit from reducing its learning curve, lowering pricing for smaller projects, and simplifying its deployment model for beginners.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Inflectra Rapise is known for its straightforward deployment and responsive customer support, allowing quick setup and resolution. Telerik Test Studio offers an advanced deployment model that provides deeper integration possibilities, albeit with a steeper learning curve.

Pricing and ROI: Inflectra Rapise offers a lower setup cost, appealing to startups or smaller projects needing faster ROI. Telerik Test Studio requires a higher initial investment but promises better ROI over time due to its robust performance in large-scale applications.

To learn more, read our detailed Inflectra Rapise vs. Telerik Test Studio Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Inflectra Rapise vs. Telerik Test Studio

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Inflectra Rapise

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

20th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) (32nd), AI Quality Assurance (2nd)

Telerik Test Studio

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

26th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (24th), Load Testing Tools (14th), Regression Testing Tools (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Inflectra Rapise is 0.7%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Telerik Test Studio is 1.2%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Inflectra Rapise	0.7%
Telerik Test Studio	1.2%
Other	98.1%

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

WIllWorley

Software Consultant at The New Humanitarian

The tool needs to improve in the areas of security, though it is a versatile product

Inflectra Rapise needs to expand its ability. I spoke with Inflectra's executive account rep on the need to expand the tool's ability. The problem with Inflectra Rapise is that a lot of companies are still using SAP GUI. Inflectra has no intention of building Rapise in a way that allows it to interact with SAP GUI. Inflectra Rapise has very limited value for the companies I work with because they they still use SAP GUI since their top priority is SAP testing, and they want to get into automation, for which they need a tool that cannot only used to automate processes, but can also do end-to-end testing where you are not only using SAP GUI, but you are using the interface with old legacy systems that are still in use or with today's more modern technologies. In the future, the tool needs to increase its versatility. If I am at a company that uses 23 different technologies, like .NET Visual Basic, Oracle, SQL, or whatever, Inflectra Rapise needs to be made as a product that is an out-of-the-box usable tool for any technology.

Read full review

Chirag N M

Senior Quality Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Supports multiple platforms and identifies elements in a good way

Instead of Telerik Test Studio, I'd recommend writing test cases in .Net so that in the future, if you move away from Telerik Test Studio to another tool, it would be easier for you. Your current code would be reusable. You won't have to change your test cases much. We wrote our code in a separate IDE, which was Visual Studio, and internally, we had the infrastructure to interact with Telerik Test Studio. All the internal logic that we needed for our purpose was implemented in .NET, and we used Telerik Test Studio for tests. I'd rate Telerik Test Studio an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its versatility."

"It's pretty straightforward to set up."

"We always use the product for end-to-end automation test cases."

"Before using Telerik Test Studio, I was a manual tester, so it was my first automation tool, yet I felt very comfortable using it. I've used the record and play feature, and Telerik Test Studio was easy to use. The tool was easy to understand, even for a first-time user like me."

"Has a very smooth process for launching and closing the application after execution."

"The most valuable aspects of the solution are the font, size, and interface."

"The way it identifies elements is good."

"The performance and load testing are very good."

Cons

"It would be good if there could be more integration of Inflectra Rapise, since not all customers use the same tool for test management and automation integration."

"The maintenance is very difficult. We've only been using the platform for three months, so I'm not sure if that will continue, but right now it's an observation I've had."

"Inflectra Rapise needs to expand its ability."

"I observed that the Excel and Word validation was quite challenging, which is an area for improvement in the tool. I also experienced minor difficulties with Telerik Test Studio, particularly in fetching elements in some scenarios when using C# for coding."

"The charts need to be more detailed and customizable."

"It can be improved by including a feature that allows multiple file types to be selected simultaneously."

"Its UI is not very user-friendly and could be improved. For new users, it isn't easy."

"There are some compatibility issues with the load standpoint test."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where ten means very good pricing."

"We pay no more than $50 annually for support of each one of the licenses."

"The pricing is fair so I rate it an eight out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Government

16%

Comms Service Provider

13%

Performing Arts

Manufacturing Company

19%

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

No data available

Comparisons

Ranorex Studio vs Inflectra Rapise

Compared 33% of the time

Automation Anywhere vs Inflectra Rapise

Compared 28% of the time

UiPath Platform vs Inflectra Rapise

Compared 21% of the time

NICE Robotic Automation vs Inflectra Rapise

Compared 19% of the time

More Inflectra Rapise Competitors

Selenium HQ vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 15% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 11% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 7% of the time

UBIK Load Pack vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 7% of the time

More Telerik Test Studio Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Inflectra Rapise

January 2026

Download Inflectra Rapise product report

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

December 2025

Download Telerik Test Studio product report

Also Known As

Rapise

No data available

Overview

Inflectra Rapise is a robust software testing tool designed to automate testing for desktop, mobile, and web applications. It offers flexibility for testing scenarios and supports both functional and regression testing, suited for end-to-end test management needs.

Inflectra Rapise integrates seamlessly with existing technologies, providing a comprehensive environment for test automation. With its scriptless test automation approach, users can rapidly create tests without needing deep programming skills. This empowers teams to improve productivity and efficiency. Rapise's user-friendly interface and its ability to handle complex testing scenarios make it a preferred choice among testing professionals.

What are the critical features of Inflectra Rapise?

Keyword-Driven Testing: Enables easy reuse of test scripts with minimal effort.
Web Services Testing: Supports verification of web API performance and reliability.
Cross-Browser Support: Allows testing across different web browsers to ensure compatibility.
Data-Driven Testing: Facilitates the execution of tests with multiple data sets for thorough coverage.
Mobile Testing Support: Provides testing capabilities for iOS and Android applications.

What benefits should users look for?

Reduced Testing Time: Increased automation reduces the need for manual testing, saving time and resources.
Improved Accuracy: Automation minimizes human error, leading to more reliable testing outcomes.
Enhanced Collaboration: Easy integration with team collaboration tools enhances communication.
Scalability: Adapts to different project sizes and complexities, ensuring versatile use.

Inflectra Rapise is implemented across numerous industries, including finance, healthcare, and retail, where precise and efficient software testing is crucial. Its adaptability means it can meet diverse testing requirements, making it indispensable for projects demanding rigorous QA processes.

Inflectra

Telerik Test Studio is an innovative and easy-to-use automated web, WPF and load testing solution. Test Studio tests support essential technologies like ASP.NET AJAX, Silverlight, PHP and MVC. Test Studio functional testing is a comprehensive yet cost-effective automated testing suite. Users can complete tasks quickly and easily with the product's point-and-click interface, which is augmented by Telerik-exclusive features like a visual storyboard and 3D element selection. Test Studio also offers script-less test automation for Silverlight applications. Test Studio load tests allow users to capture quickly capture, multiply and replay complex web traffic. Record HTTP traffic from desktop browsers, mobile devices and web services, and replay traffic with hundreds or thousands of virtual users spread across multiple machines. Fine-tune your load scenario with data binding, user authentication, and dynamic targets. Test Studio Mobile is an intuitive and easy to use test automation solution for Mobile application testing. Create tests once and test across multiple devices and OS's. The point and click functionality allows users to capture quickly and replay complex mobile testing functionality. There is no need to write a single line of code. Test against any number of real devices as you wish or through an emulator by connecting through Wifi. Test Studio for APIs helps customers verify the integrity and reliability of their APIs in an easy way and incorporate their API testing effort in their continuous testing and delivery process. Test Studio for APIs is used to determine whether APIs return the correct response for a broad range of commonly accepted requests, react properly to edge cases such as failures and unexpected inputs, as well as deliver the responses in an acceptable amount of time.

Progress Software

Sample Customers

- Soflab - RegEd - Intel - US Government

Fox, Chicco, BNP Paribas, eBay, Coca Cola, AT&T

Buyer's Guide

Inflectra Rapise vs. Telerik Test Studio

December 2025

Free Report: Inflectra Rapise vs. Telerik Test Studio

Find out what your peers are saying about Inflectra Rapise vs. Telerik Test Studio and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Inflectra Rapise vs. Telerik Test Studio report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.