Inflectra Rapise vs NTT-AT WinActor comparison

Inflectra and NTT DATA are both solutions in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category. Inflectra is ranked #32 with an average rating of 4.0, while NTT DATA is ranked #27 with an average rating of 8.0. Inflectra holds a 0.6% mindshare in RPA, compared to NTT DATA’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Inflectra users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of NTT DATA users who would recommend it.

Inflectra Rapise

Read 7 Inflectra Rapise reviews

864 Views
389 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

NTT-AT WinActor

Read 2 NTT-AT WinActor reviews

481 Views
462 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Inflectra Rapise

NTT-AT WinActor

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 11, 2025

Inflectra Rapise and NTT-AT WinActor are competing automated testing tools, with Inflectra Rapise standing out for its customer support and NTT-AT WinActor preferred for its comprehensive features.

Features: Inflectra Rapise comes with broad scripting capabilities, effective test management, and support for diverse application types. NTT-AT WinActor provides robust automation features, excels in RPA, and integrates AI functionalities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Inflectra Rapise is simple to deploy with detailed documentation and responsive support. NTT-AT WinActor offers competent support but requires a more complex setup process.

Pricing and ROI: Inflectra Rapise offers competitive pricing with cost-effective licensing and lower setup costs, ensuring quicker ROI. NTT-AT WinActor has a higher initial cost but leverages its extensive automation abilities for long-term ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Inflectra Rapise vs. NTT-AT WinActor Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Inflectra Rapise vs. NTT-AT WinActor

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Inflectra Rapise

Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

32nd

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Automation Tools (20th), AI Quality Assurance (2nd)

NTT-AT WinActor

Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

27th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category, the mindshare of Inflectra Rapise is 0.6%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NTT-AT WinActor is 0.7%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
NTT-AT WinActor	0.7%
Inflectra Rapise	0.6%
Other	98.7%

Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

Featured Reviews

WIllWorley

Software Consultant at The New Humanitarian

The tool needs to improve in the areas of security, though it is a versatile product

Inflectra Rapise needs to expand its ability. I spoke with Inflectra's executive account rep on the need to expand the tool's ability. The problem with Inflectra Rapise is that a lot of companies are still using SAP GUI. Inflectra has no intention of building Rapise in a way that allows it to interact with SAP GUI. Inflectra Rapise has very limited value for the companies I work with because they they still use SAP GUI since their top priority is SAP testing, and they want to get into automation, for which they need a tool that cannot only used to automate processes, but can also do end-to-end testing where you are not only using SAP GUI, but you are using the interface with old legacy systems that are still in use or with today's more modern technologies. In the future, the tool needs to increase its versatility. If I am at a company that uses 23 different technologies, like .NET Visual Basic, Oracle, SQL, or whatever, Inflectra Rapise needs to be made as a product that is an out-of-the-box usable tool for any technology.

Read full review

reviewer1170825

IT Planning Assistant Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Frees up employee time but can't run when computer system is locked

Something that could be improved is that this solution can't run when the computer is locked, which meant we had to implement it in our own on-prem server as it never auto-locks. It would be better if, when we have scheduled a scenario, it would log into the system automatically.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its versatility."

"We always use the product for end-to-end automation test cases."

"It's pretty straightforward to set up."

"This software is very smart - it can decide from a picture if we like that condition, and then the robot will do that action."

"The tool's most valuable feature is data import. The OCR feature helps to recognize the data. It can recognize screen and document numbers well."

Cons

"Inflectra Rapise needs to expand its ability."

"The maintenance is very difficult. We've only been using the platform for three months, so I'm not sure if that will continue, but right now it's an observation I've had."

"It would be good if there could be more integration of Inflectra Rapise, since not all customers use the same tool for test management and automation integration."

"Something that could be improved is that this solution can't run when the computer is locked, which meant we had to implement it in our own on-prem server as it never auto-locks."

"The OCR has issues recognizing handwritten data."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We pay no more than $50 annually for support of each one of the licenses."

"I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where ten means very good pricing."

"We pay yearly for the agent who runs the processes, plus an additional fee for maintenance costs."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Government

16%

Comms Service Provider

13%

Performing Arts

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Inflectra Rapise?

The most valuable feature of the solution is its versatility.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Inflectra Rapise?

I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where ten means very good pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Inflectra Rapise?

See all answers

What do you like most about NTT-AT WinActor?

The tool's most valuable feature is data import. The OCR feature helps to recognize the data. It can recognize screen and document numbers well.

See all answers

What needs improvement with NTT-AT WinActor?

The OCR has issues recognizing handwritten data.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering NTT-AT WinActor?

For the repeat tasks, we have two options. The first option is to use the scanner to set up the scheduler. Alternatively, we can use another method where we set up the task or schedule on the manag...

See all answers

Comparisons

Ranorex Studio vs Inflectra Rapise

Compared 33% of the time

Automation Anywhere vs Inflectra Rapise

Compared 28% of the time

UiPath Platform vs Inflectra Rapise

Compared 21% of the time

NICE Robotic Automation vs Inflectra Rapise

Compared 19% of the time

More Inflectra Rapise Competitors

UiPath Platform vs NTT-AT WinActor

Compared 32% of the time

Microsoft Power Automate vs NTT-AT WinActor

Compared 21% of the time

Nintex RPA vs NTT-AT WinActor

Compared 18% of the time

Pega Robotic Process Automation vs NTT-AT WinActor

Compared 15% of the time

TIS RPA vs NTT-AT WinActor

Compared 14% of the time

More NTT-AT WinActor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Inflectra Rapise

January 2026

Download Inflectra Rapise product report

Buyer's Guide

Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

December 2025

Download NTT-AT WinActor product report

Also Known As

Rapise

NTT WinActor, WinActor, NTT-AT Robotic Process Automation Software, NTT-AT RPA

Overview

Inflectra Rapise is a robust software testing tool designed to automate testing for desktop, mobile, and web applications. It offers flexibility for testing scenarios and supports both functional and regression testing, suited for end-to-end test management needs.

Inflectra Rapise integrates seamlessly with existing technologies, providing a comprehensive environment for test automation. With its scriptless test automation approach, users can rapidly create tests without needing deep programming skills. This empowers teams to improve productivity and efficiency. Rapise's user-friendly interface and its ability to handle complex testing scenarios make it a preferred choice among testing professionals.

What are the critical features of Inflectra Rapise?

Keyword-Driven Testing: Enables easy reuse of test scripts with minimal effort.
Web Services Testing: Supports verification of web API performance and reliability.
Cross-Browser Support: Allows testing across different web browsers to ensure compatibility.
Data-Driven Testing: Facilitates the execution of tests with multiple data sets for thorough coverage.
Mobile Testing Support: Provides testing capabilities for iOS and Android applications.

What benefits should users look for?

Reduced Testing Time: Increased automation reduces the need for manual testing, saving time and resources.
Improved Accuracy: Automation minimizes human error, leading to more reliable testing outcomes.
Enhanced Collaboration: Easy integration with team collaboration tools enhances communication.
Scalability: Adapts to different project sizes and complexities, ensuring versatile use.

Inflectra Rapise is implemented across numerous industries, including finance, healthcare, and retail, where precise and efficient software testing is crucial. Its adaptability means it can meet diverse testing requirements, making it indispensable for projects demanding rigorous QA processes.

Inflectra

NTT-AT RPA accurately reproduces workflows - from simple form processing to sophisticated tasks - to streamline work.

NTT DATA

Sample Customers

- Soflab - RegEd - Intel - US Government

Exeo Tech Corporation

Buyer's Guide

Inflectra Rapise vs. NTT-AT WinActor

December 2025

Free Report: Inflectra Rapise vs. NTT-AT WinActor

Find out what your peers are saying about Inflectra Rapise vs. NTT-AT WinActor and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Inflectra Rapise vs. NTT-AT WinActor report.

See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.

We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.