Imperva Web Application Firewall vs Radware AppWall comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Imperva Web Application Firewall and Radware AppWall based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Imperva Web Application Firewall vs. Radware AppWall Report (Updated: November 2022).
655,113 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable features of the Imperva Web Application Firewall are performance and flexibility. We can extend or customize the box itself.""The configurability of the tools and the ease of operation to be the most valuable feature of Imperva.""The solution is stable.""The WAF itself has been very valuable to me because it has such a complete range of features. Another reason why I like it is because it also takes care of the total overview of the traffic over the network.""The solution integrates seamlessly with other tools and has a good alert mechanism.""Imperva Web Application Firewall is a highly stable solution and is very mature.""The features I have found most valuable with Imperva Web Application Firewall are account takeover protection, advanced bot protection, and API security.""The solution has been quite stable. I have not seen any bugs at all."

More Imperva Web Application Firewall Pros →

"A user-friendly and reasonably priced solution.""The product offers high availability.""The device blocks threats and allows legitimate users to work correctly."

More Radware AppWall Pros →

Cons
"An improvement for Imperva WAF would be to reduce the number of false positives and create more strong use cases based on AI/ML or behavioral analytics.""I loved the approach of the cloud. The cloud has a lot of new features, like advanced web protection and DDoS protection. If those could also be on-boarded onto the on-prem versions, that would be ideal. They need to pay attention to both deployment options and not just favor one.""I'd like the option to pick your bot protection.""In the past, I have bugs on the WAF. I've contacted Imperva about them. Future releases should be less buggy.""It would be nice to have more security control over mobile applications so I would suggest adding more mobile security features. It would also be beneficial to see improvements in regards to interface bandwidth performance, CPU time, and RAM size. Learning capability of the device is quite weak.""The support for the on-premises version needs improvement.""It should be more user-friendly. Like other web solutions, it would be helpful to be able to easily do policy configuration and identification inside the application. Understanding the in-depth configuration of a policy is somewhat difficult for an engineer, and they can improve that.""They recently separated the WAF and the DAM management gateways in order for each of these to be managed from different areas, so I believe it now requires additional investments for what was previously a single complete solution."

More Imperva Web Application Firewall Cons →

"You need to have pretty good internal knowledge of the solution.""Scalability should be based on customer requirements.""The user interface can be improved."

More Radware AppWall Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "There is a license for this solution and we purchase the license annually with no additional fees."
  • "There are a couple of different licensing models."
  • "The price of Imperva Web Application Firewalls is expensive compared to others."
  • "Licensing can range from one to twenty thousand dollars annually. Additionally, some features, including software support, require an annual subscription as well."
  • "Imperva Web Application Firewall price is higher compared to other solutions. However, everything is included in the price."
  • "We sell three-year licenses for Imperva Web Application Firewall to our customers. The price is a little expensive."
  • "The solution's pricing is an issue."
  • "The pricing is somewhat expensive. It is actually a huge investment when compared to other countries."
  • More Imperva Web Application Firewall Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
    655,113 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:For ADC, any ADC can do a good job. But in case if you want to add WAF functionality to the same ADC hardware you have to look for other ADC's like F5, Imperva, Radware, Fortinet, etc. 
    Top Answer:You can have a look to Imperva Cloud WAF, the anti-DDoS mitigation is under 1s and works very well. I observed a lot of DDoS attacks that were well managed (even not seen by the customer) by Imperva… more »
    Top Answer:The product offers high availability.
    Top Answer:With a good configuration and a good understanding of the application, you can have very good integration with the web application firewall and Radware application. However, it isn't easy. We need to… more »
    Top Answer:At this moment we have the home web page at the enterprise with an application firewall. We have 21 applications that we need to upload to the cloud. At this moment we have only one, and we working in… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    9,305
    Comparisons
    7,584
    Reviews
    17
    Average Words per Review
    407
    Rating
    8.6
    Views
    1,891
    Comparisons
    1,432
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    540
    Rating
    6.7
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    Web application attacks deny services and steal sensitive data. Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF) analyzes and inspects requests coming in to applications and stops these attacks.

    Protect your applications in the cloud and on-premises with the same set of security policies and management capabilities. Safely migrate apps while maintaining full protection.

    Deploy Imperva WAF on-premises, in AWS and Azure, or as a cloud service itself. Easily meet the specific security and service level requirements of individual applications.

    Imperva WAF protects against the most critical web application security risks: SQL injection, cross-site scripting, illegal resource access, remote file inclusion, and other OWASP Top 10 and Automated Top 20 threats. Imperva security researchers continually monitor the threat landscape and update Imperva WAF with the latest threat data.

    AppWall is a WAF that ensures fast, reliable and secure delivery of mission-critical web applications and APIs regardless of the environment they’re deployed (private or public). AppWall is an NSS recommended, ICSA Labs certified and PCI compliant WAF that combines positive and negative security models to provide complete protection against web application attacks, access violations, attacks disguised behind CDNs, API manipulations, advanced HTTP-based assaults, brute force attacks on login pages, and more.

    Offer
    Learn more about Imperva Web Application Firewall
    Learn more about Radware AppWall
    Sample Customers
    BlueCross BlueShield, eHarmony, EMF Broadcasting, GE Healthcare, Metro Bank, The Motley Fool, Siemens
    Accuview.com, Ace, ADP, BuyPass, Computershare, DTCC, Firehost, Garanti, HP, Konami, Mohawk, SeatPG, Telenet
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company21%
    Insurance Company14%
    Comms Service Provider14%
    Security Firm14%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Insurance Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company21%
    Comms Service Provider15%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business55%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise32%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise63%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business50%
    Midsize Enterprise25%
    Large Enterprise25%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise59%
    Buyer's Guide
    Imperva Web Application Firewall vs. Radware AppWall
    November 2022
    Find out what your peers are saying about Imperva Web Application Firewall vs. Radware AppWall and other solutions. Updated: November 2022.
    655,113 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Imperva Web Application Firewall is ranked 6th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 20 reviews while Radware AppWall is ranked 22nd in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 3 reviews. Imperva Web Application Firewall is rated 8.6, while Radware AppWall is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of Imperva Web Application Firewall writes "Simple to maintain, easy to configure, and easy to scale". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Radware AppWall writes "Stable with high availability and good dashboards". Imperva Web Application Firewall is most compared with AWS WAF, F5 Advanced WAF, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, Imperva DDoS and F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM), whereas Radware AppWall is most compared with F5 Advanced WAF, AWS WAF, Fortinet FortiWeb, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway and Azure Web Application Firewall. See our Imperva Web Application Firewall vs. Radware AppWall report.

    See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

    We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.