IBM Security Network IPS vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Security Network IPS and Trellix Intrusion Prevention System based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Darktrace, Vectra AI, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS).
To learn more, read our detailed Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature is its simplicity.""The initial setup is simple."

More IBM Security Network IPS Pros →

"The product is worth the investment.""McAfee NSP is much more stable than Cisco.""Overall the solution is very good. It offers great protection and gives us a good overview of what is on the network.""The initial setup is straightforward.""The threat intelligence updates are very accurate.""It has a lot of functions, such as firewall. We are administrators, and we create some rules to protect our network. We also monitor the traffic in and out and have disk encryption on-premises. When we detect malware, we scan for the virus on the PC. We can then delete or block the malware.""The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that it is a good product for dealing with DDoS attacks and for the inspection of network traffic.""There's a good dashboard you can drill down into. It helps you easily locate intrusions and the source of attacks."

More Trellix Intrusion Prevention System Pros →

Cons
"In the future, I would like to see a hybrid option so that we can work both on-premises and in the cloud.""I'd like to see more integration with other tools and technologies."

More IBM Security Network IPS Cons →

"The technical support has room for improvement.""There are limited resources for configuration guidance.""The area of concern where the tool needs improvement is how the product prompts users at a network level that helps prevent any wireless network attacks through alerts and notifications.""The platform’s GUI could be the latest.""The solution needs to improve the graphical interface. And they had a limitation in some of the sensor modems as well.""The management console needs to be less complex and easier to navigate.""We would like to have a simpler version. Some settings and functions on the McAfee console are complex and complicated. I want the management console to be simpler.""Some of the documentation is not as straightforward as it could be."

More Trellix Intrusion Prevention System Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten."
  • "The tool is competitively priced."
  • More Trellix Intrusion Prevention System Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions are best for your needs.
    769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The solution is quite costly. It's high in comparison to other devices.
    Top Answer:Defining the new security rules and policies sometimes becomes a challenge. Integration with other platforms becomes a challenge as well. I'd like to see more integration with other tools and… more »
    Top Answer:The threat intelligence updates are very accurate.
    Top Answer:The tool is competitively priced. I rate the pricing a six out of ten.
    Top Answer:Network Threat Behavior Analysis must be improved. The technical support must be improved. The support team must provide better help with configurations of devices and enabling NTBA.
    Ranking
    Views
    446
    Comparisons
    350
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    719
    Rating
    7.0
    Views
    1,533
    Comparisons
    1,131
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    298
    Rating
    8.4
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Security Network Intrusion Prevention System, IBM Security Network Protection, XGS, GX
    McAfee Network Security Platform, McAfee NSP, IntruShield Network Intrusion Prevention System, IntruShield Network IPS
    Learn More
    Trellix
    Video Not Available
    Overview
    IBM Security Network Intrusion Prevention System appliances are designed to stop constantly evolving threats before they impact your business. This means providing both high levels of protection and performance, while lowering the overall cost and complexity associated with deploying and managing a large number of point solutions.

    Block More Intrusions
    Stop new and unknown attacks with signature-based and signature-less intrusion prevention systems. Signature-less intrusion detection finds malicious network traffic and stops attacks where no signatures exist.

    Unify Virtual and Physical Security
    Support network virtualization across private and public cloud platforms to scale security and evolve with changing IT dynamics.

    Maximize Security and Performance
    Scale hardware performance to speeds up to 100 Gbps and leverage data from multiple products.

    Sample Customers
    Equifax, Christian Hospital Centre
    Desjardins Group, HollyFrontier, Nubia, Agbar, WNS Global Services, INAIL, Universidad de Las Américas Puebla (UDLAP), Cook County, China Pacific Insurance, Bank Central Asia, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, City of Chicago, Macquarie Telecom, Sutherland Global Services, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, United Automotive Electronic Systems
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm24%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Real Estate/Law Firm6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Government10%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise73%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise40%
    Large Enterprise33%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise68%
    Buyer's Guide
    Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Darktrace, Vectra AI, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS). Updated: April 2024.
    769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM Security Network IPS is ranked 24th in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) with 4 reviews while Trellix Intrusion Prevention System is ranked 15th in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) with 14 reviews. IBM Security Network IPS is rated 7.2, while Trellix Intrusion Prevention System is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of IBM Security Network IPS writes "User-friendly and has a good blocking feature but is quite expensive". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trellix Intrusion Prevention System writes "Protects from attacks in real-time and provides accurate threat intelligence updates". IBM Security Network IPS is most compared with Darktrace, Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention and Cisco Secure Network Analytics, whereas Trellix Intrusion Prevention System is most compared with Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System, Cisco NGIPS, Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention, Check Point IPS and Trend Micro Deep Discovery.

    See our list of best Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) vendors.

    We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.