IBM Rational System Architect vs MID Innovator comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo
1,534 views|844 comparisons
83% willing to recommend
MID GmbH Logo
147 views|107 comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Rational System Architect and MID Innovator based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about LeanIX, Sparx Systems, erwin by Quest and others in Enterprise Architecture Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Architecture Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Entrprsarch67
Use MID Innovator?
Ranking
Views
1,534
Comparisons
844
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
147
Comparisons
107
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Architecture Management
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about LeanIX, Sparx Systems, erwin by Quest and others in Enterprise Architecture Management. Updated: April 2024.
768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Rational System Architect
Learn More
MID GmbH
Video Not Available
Overview
IBM Rational System Architect is an enterprise architecture solution for visualizing, analyzing, and communicating enterprise architecture and business process analysis. This solution provides decision support, process optimization, and integration into solution delivery. Rational System Architect addresses all aspects of your organization's enterprise architecture, including modeling, publishing, analysis, and execution.
Innovator Enterprise Modeling Suite is a Scalable Modeling Environment for All Involved in the Innovation Process: Perfect business IT alignment: everyone works in realtime on the same model: requirements analysts, business analysts, software architects, database architects and enterprise architects, integrated modeling and requirements transparency spanning all domains, high level of scalability for very large models and comprehensive configuration and customization. Enterprise Modeling Suite gives you: Innovator for Enterprise Architects, Innovator for Business Analysts, Innovator for Software Architects and Innovator for Information Architects.
Sample Customers
Wuxi Lake Cloud, Nationwide, ETI, IDS Scheer
Computer Sciences Corporation
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm14%
Manufacturing Company14%
Computer Software Company12%
Government12%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm19%
University11%
Educational Organization8%
Government8%
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business16%
Midsize Enterprise9%
Large Enterprise75%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise74%
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Architecture Management
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about LeanIX, Sparx Systems, erwin by Quest and others in Enterprise Architecture Management. Updated: April 2024.
768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM Rational System Architect is ranked 20th in Enterprise Architecture Management while MID Innovator is ranked 28th in Enterprise Architecture Management. IBM Rational System Architect is rated 7.4, while MID Innovator is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of IBM Rational System Architect writes "Modeling is useful, but many features need improvement and technical support is lacking". On the other hand, IBM Rational System Architect is most compared with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, SAP PowerDesigner, UNICOM System Architect and erwin Data Modeler by Quest, whereas MID Innovator is most compared with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect.

See our list of best Enterprise Architecture Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Architecture Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.