Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Rational Performance Tester vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs Tricentis Tosca comparison

The compared IBM and OpenText solutions aren't in the same category. IBM is ranked #25 in TMT , and holds a 1.5% mindshare in the category. OpenText is ranked #4 in PTT , with an average rating of 8.5, and holds a 14.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of OpenText users who would recommend it.
IBM Rational Performance Te...
Read 17 IBM Rational Performance Tester reviews
  • 588 Views
  • 106 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Tricentis Tosca
Read 112 Tricentis Tosca reviews
  • 22,598 Views
  • 12,429 Comparison Views
96% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between IBM Rational Performance Tester, OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional), and Tricentis Tosca based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, IDERA, Tricentis and others in Test Management Tools.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Test Management Tools Report (Updated: August 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Test Management Tools
August 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Mindshare comparison

Test Management Tools
Performance Testing Tools
Functional Testing Tools
 

Featured Reviews

KashifJamil - PeerSpot reviewer
Supports web and mobile applications, very scalable, very stable, and wonderful support
There are some features that Micro Focus LoadRunner provides, but they are not available in IBM Rational Performance Tester. They should include such features. It can also have more reports similar to what HP provides. It might also need some improvement in terms of the tools and support for other technology areas. Certain technologies are not supported by every tool. They need to support all sorts of technologies and platforms on which web applications and mobile applications are built. They need complete support for all sorts of technologies.
Read full review
HelenSague - PeerSpot reviewer
A sophisticated tool that supports many languages and works with all kinds of applications
I do not have any big challenges with LoadRunner. I only have some issues with load generators. It is a very common issue, and I hope it will be resolved in the latest release. For example, when we start to run our tests, users get the message that the load generator exceeded 80% of the CPU utilization. Even when the number of users is less, we get these messages. I am trying to resolve it, but it is not going. It is annoying. It is not a failure, but I hope that it will be resolved. IBM WebSphere MQ testing can be a bit challenging. It can handle that, but I hope that they will build more and more capabilities. We do a huge amount of testing for messaging. Just like aviation, the railway industry is based on messaging. There is messaging to build trains and messaging to create some bills. There are many train movements. Everything involves messaging. I wish that it will be developed more for IBM WebSphere testing. Monitoring is okay, but for testing, I currently have to create Java users. I have to load a lot of libraries from IBM WebSphere and so on.
Read full review
PrabhuKrishnamoorthy - PeerSpot reviewer
Has transformed testing by reducing scripting effort and enhancing productivity with advanced features
The self-healing feature of Tricentis Tosca needs significant improvement. Currently, it is static and not dynamic. For example, if a button in an application changes, Tricentis Tosca should be smart enough to detect the change and still execute the script seamlessly. Improvements are needed to ensure it responds dynamically to changes in the application.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It can support both web applications and mobile applications, and in certain cases, it can also support testing of desktop applications or software-based applications. You can write web applications, mobile applications, and software-based applications."
"Technical support is very good. I'm very satisfied with the assistance we've received so far."
"The number of protocols that it supports, and especially, for example, when it talks about SAP GUI-based performance testing."
"One of the most valuable features of LoadRunner Professional is the wide range of protocols it supports, especially the web user v user types."
"It provides clients with an understanding of application and system performance."
"The ability to do multithreading. That's available in any performance testing tool, but the number of protocols that this particular tool supports has been very good."
"I recommend LoadRunner Professional as it supports many protocols and applications and is very easy to set up and use."
"The most useful aspect of the solution is that it provides agents in different geographic locations."
"The capabilities and flexibility of the Controller, the ability to monitor the systems under test, and the comprehensive results Analysis which saves a great deal of time."
"LoadRunner Professional allowed us to load test potential new payroll solutions that would be implemented throughout the entire organization so that we knew which was best suited to performing well under pressure."
More OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) pros
"I like how the modules are set up, particularly how you can use the screens you're automating. This automation helps save both time and money because we use less test capacity regarding personnel."
"Image recognition: It has allowed us to automate a GUI section of our product which involves drawing different topologies."
"Multiple scanning engines to automate many different applications."
"Compared to other tools we have been looking at, you don't have to be a programmer to operate it, though it helps. It also a product that can be used by business people."
"Tricentis Tosca can be easily integrated with SAP infrastructure."
"The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"The use of automation is most valuable."
"The initial setup isn't too difficult."
More Tricentis Tosca pros
 

Cons

"The solution is not easily scalable. If you want to extend the solution, you need to purchase a different kind of license. You also have to work with the IBM team to assist in scaling."
"There are some features that Micro Focus LoadRunner provides, but they are not available in IBM Rational Performance Tester. They should include such features. It can also have more reports similar to what HP provides. It might also need some improvement in terms of the tools and support for other technology areas. Certain technologies are not supported by every tool. They need to support all sorts of technologies and platforms on which web applications and mobile applications are built. They need complete support for all sorts of technologies."
"The flexibility could be improved."
"The product is not stable and reliable in the version we are currently using."
"I guess scalability becomes a problem when you use things like TruClients."
"The solution must be more user-friendly."
"I would like to have better support for adding more users per load generator."
"Sometimes when we were migrating from one version to another, some of our scripts started failing."
"The reporting and GUI have room for improvement."
"Support for Microsoft Dynamics needs improvement."
More OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) cons
"I would like to be able to manage different projects in one repository or have better data exchange between repositories."
"One thing to improve in Tricentis Tosca is that it's not compatible with Excel based forms. Another area for improvement is that the tool is not compatible with OpenText applications. The support and licensing cost for it also need improvement. The tool also needs cloud support, as it's currently on-premises only."
"The main area where there is room for improvement is how they do upgrades. Going through this current upgrade, we were delayed a month because we are using a third-party tool. It's called Tosca Connect by Tasktop. When this latest upgrade broke that relationship between the two, it took Tricentis a month to come back with a workable solution... Their whole upgrade process needs to be better and cleaner, from an end-user standpoint."
"The support we received from Tricentis Tosca was good, but it can improve."
"The initial setup was complex."
"You need to spend much more time learning the tool and how to use it, compared to others."
"Tricentis Tosca could improve on its mobile automation solution."
"Tricentis Tosca’s technical support could be improved."
More Tricentis Tosca cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is much cheaper than Micro Focus LoadRunner. We need perpetual licenses. Support is included in the first sale. After that, you need to renew support every year."
"On a scale of one to ten, where one is low and ten is a high price, I rate the solution a five."
"LoadRunner Professional is an expensive product."
"The licensing of Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional could improve. If it can be easier and the concurrent run can be included with the current total number of users, it would be helpful."
"The licensing fees are based on the number of users."
"I would rate the solution's pricing a nine out of ten."
"I would still consider LoadRunner as an expensive tool and you get a LoadRunner and the Performance Center."
"It is a high-cost investment, particularly for companies with small budgets or limited testing needs."
"OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise's pricing is reasonable."
More OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) pricing and cost advice
"The price of Tricentis Tosca is approximately Є10,000 for one license. However, it used to be much cheaper, but they changed their license structure. It used to be a structure where if you bought a license you would receive one year of free support and maintenance. Now they only have a yearly license, and that is expensive."
"My understanding is that it's an expensive product, although I don't know the specifics with regards to pricing."
"Pricing for Tricentis Tosca could be improved because it's very expensive."
"Pricing could be better."
"There are different types of licenses: enterprise or professional. The cost varies."
"The pricing is high, but altogether it offers you the ability to automate all sorts of applications: desktop, web, mobile, etc."
"I give the cost of Tricentis Tosca a six out of seven."
"I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. It is on the higher side."
More Tricentis Tosca pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user104961 - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 13, 2014
LoadRunner vs NeoLoad
The six phases of an IT project Enthusiasm Disillusionment Panic Search for the guilty Punishment of the innocent (the performance tester) Praise and rewards for the incompetent non-participants This article has been put together as part of an evaluation of the performance test tools NeoLoad and…
Read full review
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
26%
Government
15%
Computer Software Company
15%
Outsourcing Company
4%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Government
6%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Retailer
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional?
When designing a workload model offers a good range of possibilities for creating goal-oriented scenarios, which help...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional?
The pricing should be reduced and made more competitive.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional?
I would like to improve OpenText LoadRunner Professional based on what we discussed in our last discussion, as those ...
See all answers
How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?
We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus...
See all answers
How does Tricentis Tosca compare with Worksoft Certify?
Tosca fulfills our business needs better because it is an end-to-end solution across technologies. We like that it is...
See all answers
What do you like most about Tricentis Tosca?
For beginners, the product is good, especially for those who are interested in the quality side of software testing.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Apache JMeter vs IBM Rational Performance Tester Logo
Apache JMeter vs IBM Rational Performance Tester
Compared 53% of the time
Tricentis NeoLoad vs IBM Rational Performance Tester Logo
Tricentis NeoLoad vs IBM Rational Performance Tester
Compared 18% of the time
More IBM Rational Performance Tester Competitors
Tricentis NeoLoad vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) Logo
Tricentis NeoLoad vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)
Compared 23% of the time
OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) Logo
OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)
Compared 13% of the time
Apache JMeter vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) Logo
Apache JMeter vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)
Compared 10% of the time
OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) Logo
OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)
Compared 6% of the time
BlazeMeter vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) Logo
BlazeMeter vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)
Compared 3% of the time
More OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) Competitors
Worksoft Certify vs Tricentis Tosca Logo
Worksoft Certify vs Tricentis Tosca
Compared 11% of the time
OpenText Functional Testing vs Tricentis Tosca Logo
OpenText Functional Testing vs Tricentis Tosca
Compared 10% of the time
Katalon Studio vs Tricentis Tosca Logo
Katalon Studio vs Tricentis Tosca
Compared 9% of the time
Testim vs Tricentis Tosca Logo
Testim vs Tricentis Tosca
Compared 8% of the time
UiPath Test Cloud vs Tricentis Tosca Logo
UiPath Test Cloud vs Tricentis Tosca
Compared 7% of the time
More Tricentis Tosca Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
IBM Rational Performance Tester
August 2025
IBM Rational Performance Tester reportDownload IBM Rational Performance Tester product report
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)
August 2025
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) reportDownload OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) product report
Buyer's Guide
Tricentis Tosca
July 2025
Tricentis Tosca reportDownload Tricentis Tosca product report
 

Also Known As

Rational Performance Tester
Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Micro Focus LoadRunner, HPE LoadRunner, LoadRunner
Orchestrated Service Virtualization
 

Overview

IBM Rational Performance Tester is a performance testing solution that validates the scalability of web and server applications. Rational Performance Tester identifies the presence and cause of system performance bottlenecks and reduces load testing complexity.
IBM

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering, known as LoadRunner Professional, stands out with its powerful scripting tool, flexible capabilities, and extensive analytics, supporting numerous concurrent users for impactful load testing.

This performance engineering tool offers integration across systems and strong community support, paired with user-friendly interfaces. It excels in features like multi-protocol support, auto-correlation, and detailed reporting. However, improvements are needed in user-friendliness and cost-effectiveness, as scripting remains complex and pricing is a hurdle. Enhancing mobile and SPA testing capabilities, modern protocol support, and compatibility with non-Windows platforms would greatly benefit users while expanding monitoring and technical support responsiveness.

What are the key features of OpenText LoadRunner Professional?
  • Powerful Scripting Tool: Facilitates complex load testing scenarios.
  • Flexible Engine: Supports various test configurations.
  • Multi-Protocol Support: Ensures broad compatibility.
  • Extensive Analytics: Provides real-time performance stats.
  • Concurrent User Simulation: Enables robust load testing.
  • Auto-Correlation: Simplifies script creation.
  • Comprehensive Reporting: Offers detailed insights.
What benefits should users expect from LoadRunner Professional?
  • Enhanced System Performance: Identifies and rectifies bottlenecks.
  • Cost Efficiency: Strategic use can reduce overall costs.
  • Industry Compatibility: Adapts to diverse environments.
  • Scalability: Supports applications with varied user loads.
  • Performance Benchmarking: Ensures optimal application performance.

LoadRunner Professional is employed for performance and load testing across sectors such as banking, hospitality, and telecommunications. Users simulate business transactions and test applications under different user loads, focusing on API testing, web applications, and benchmarking to achieve optimal performance in complex scenarios.

OpenText

Tricentis Tosca offers model-based testing that supports both technical and non-technical users through a user-friendly interface, enabling scriptless automation and seamless integration with UI and non-UI applications.

Tosca's modular approach enhances test maintenance and reuse while delivering comprehensive automation for diverse testing environments. Backed by risk-based testing and automated data management, it supports end-to-end testing across API, SAP, and desktop applications. Tosca's integration capabilities extend to environments like Salesforce, PHP webshops, and mobile apps, effectively enhancing Agile team workflows. Despite its strengths, room remains for improved reporting, object recognition, and more efficient upgrade processes. Enhancing documentation and mobile testing support could further elevate its functionality for many.

What key features does Tricentis Tosca offer?
  • User-friendly interface: Simplifies interactions for non-technical users.
  • Model-based testing: Facilitates the easy creation of automated test cases.
  • Scriptless automation: Enables quick test development without coding.
  • Integration capabilities: Supports connections with multiple platforms like SAP and Salesforce.
  • Modular approach: Enhances the reuse and maintenance of test components.
What benefits to expect from Tricentis Tosca?
  • Efficiency: Streamlines the testing process for faster release cycles.
  • Versatility: Suitable for diverse application environments including web and desktop.
  • Productivity: Boosts Agile team integration for comprehensive testing.
  • Risk-based testing: Prioritizes testing efforts based on potential impact.

In retail, Tricentis Tosca automates inventory and transaction testing, ensuring efficient system updates. Financial services employ it for regulatory compliance through automated test scenarios in mainframe and PDF environments. Telecommunication companies utilize Tosca for API testing, aligning services across network platforms seamlessly.

Tricentis
 

Sample Customers

andagon, Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon
JetBlue, GOME, Australian Red Cross Blood Service, RMIT University, Virgin Media
HBO, AMEX, BMW Group, ING, Bosch, Austrian Airlines, Deutsche Bank, Henkel, Allianz, Bank of America, UBS, Orange, Siemens, Swiss Re, Vodafone
Buyer's Guide
Test Management Tools
August 2025
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, IDERA, Tricentis and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: August 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.