"IBM Rational Functional Tester is very contextual."
"It is compatible with all sorts of Dark Net applications. Its coverage is very good."
"Good write and read files which save execution inputs and outputs and can be stored locally."
"They need to do a complete revamp so that even a non-technical person can manage the tool."
"If the solution is running on Linux, there are some issues around application compatibility."
"From an automation point of view, it should have better clarity and be more user friendly."
Earn 20 points
IBM Rational Functional Tester is ranked 25th in Functional Testing Tools with 2 reviews while Parasoft SOAtest is ranked 24th in Functional Testing Tools with 1 review. IBM Rational Functional Tester is rated 6.6, while Parasoft SOAtest is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of IBM Rational Functional Tester writes "Good coverage and compatibility with excellent stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Parasoft SOAtest writes "Good API testing and RIT feature; clarity could be improved". IBM Rational Functional Tester is most compared with Selenium HQ, Micro Focus UFT One, HCL OneTest, Tricentis Tosca and Ranorex Studio, whereas Parasoft SOAtest is most compared with SonarQube, Postman, SoapUI Pro, Coverity and Tricentis Tosca.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.