IBM Rational DOORS vs PTC Integrity Requirements Connector comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo
10,459 views|6,697 comparisons
89% willing to recommend
PTC Logo
1,154 views|780 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Rational DOORS and PTC Integrity Requirements Connector based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Atlassian, Siemens and others in Application Requirements Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Requirements Management Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The program is very stable.""This product can help improve how your organization proceeds through solution development.""Makes good work of prioritizing and planning product delivery.""I would say that the best feature of the solution is that since everything is in one place, and if you make any changes, then they are recorded or tracked.""I like being able to sort and categorize the requirements and the exporting functions.""The traceability matrix in DOORS improved our project outcomes. It helps ensure coverage of requirements at different levels, from user requirements to software requirements to test requirements.""The solution is stable.""It is a mature product that is stable."

More IBM Rational DOORS Pros →

"It is a stable solution...I rate the support a nine out of ten."

More PTC Integrity Requirements Connector Pros →

Cons
"It's difficult to set the code on the solution.""The performance could be improved. It doesn't run as smoothly as it could.""Both the performance and the price could be improved.""It could be more user-friendly. It's not a beautiful tool. The user interface is gray. It has only lists inside, and it's horrible when you want to add tables. It's tough to add tables and manage them. It also becomes difficult when you want to add images.""Complexity, performance, openness are the three areas that can be improved. The IBM architecture and specifically Jazz looks more complex. There are a lot of servers. It's quite complicated. The search capabilities lack in IBM Rational DOORS Classic for customers who have a database with a requirement of more than 25,000 records. For example, you can search easily for a module, but it's really difficult to look for keywords through the whole database because all the modules are separated into small components, which makes the search quite complex. This is something that's really annoying because when we want to make an impact analysis, we would like to analyze the product globally. It's quite difficult to manage. The fact that you can interact externally with data makes it complex. The approach is complex and doesn't work as expected. For example, when I tried to experiment with exporting some records, the tool crashed, but I couldn't find out the root cause, that is, whether it happened because of Rational Windows or lack of memory. It was just crashing. Logs weren't very clear. IBM can try to use more recent technology for different aspects and make it easy. They can also provide free integration from DOORS Classic to DOORS. Currently, all the customization in Excel is lost, which makes it very complex. It would be a feature to make new versions compatible with features in the past versions.""The user interface for the Change Proposal System could be improved.""There needs to be quicker access to tech support. When I have a two minute question that takes two minutes to answer, it shouldn't take me 45 minutes and/or a few days of callbacks to get to the right technical support person. It's unnecessary and frustrating for the user.""Rational DOORS' most valuable feature is that you can write any kind of requirement you want."

More IBM Rational DOORS Cons →

"The training material for PTC Integrity should be made a little bit easier or more useful for the user."

More PTC Integrity Requirements Connector Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Licensing fees are billed annually and there is no support included with what I pay."
  • "IBM is a bit too expensive in terms of pricing. Customers are paying a lot for the license, and the price is quite high for this kind of environment. It is quite high as compared to what we can get today with other solutions."
  • "It is expensive to onboard additional users."
  • "It's expensive."
  • "I don't personally know what the numbers are. I just know that one of the reasons we've limited it to three seats is a function of cost."
  • "I am not sure why it is so expensive, but one license will cost approximately $15,000 in US dollars."
  • "IBM Rational DOORS is highly expensive."
  • "We have to pay for a license. I think it's a one-time payment as my company hasn't notified me about more charges. I don't think it's expensive for large corporations, but it will be costly for an average person."
  • More IBM Rational DOORS Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Requirements Management solutions are best for your needs.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The traceability matrix in DOORS improved our project outcomes. It helps ensure coverage of requirements at different levels, from user requirements to software requirements to test requirements.
    Top Answer:I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten, with one being very affordable and ten being quite expensive. It was a little bit expensive.
    Top Answer:The modeling capabilities could benefit from a web-based tool like DOORS Next Generation, integrated with Rhapsody. So, integration between Rhapsody modeling and DOORS in the web tool. Another area of… more »
    Top Answer:It is a stable solution...I rate the support a nine out of ten.
    Top Answer:I will not be able to comment on the pricing because this is a corporate part. They have different agreements with PTC, so I cannot say.
    Top Answer:I see that when we just define the configuration management part, it is a completely different case. Somehow in our organization or current profile, we are not built to make that linkage between that… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    10,459
    Comparisons
    6,697
    Reviews
    13
    Average Words per Review
    583
    Rating
    8.2
    Views
    1,154
    Comparisons
    780
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    750
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    PTC IRC
    Learn More
    Overview

    IBM Rational DOORS is a requirements management tool whose software makes it easy to analyze, capture, trace, and manage changes to information.

    IBM Rational DOORS Features

    IBM Rational DOORS has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

    • Requirements Interchange Format
    • Rational DOORS Web Access
    • Test Tracking Toolkit
    • Open Services for Lifecycle Collaboration (OSLC)
    • Requirements definition and management capabilities
    • Work item system for task management and planning
    • Reporting system

    IBM Rational DOORS Benefits

    There are many benefits to implementing IBM Rational DOORS. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

    • Simple predefined change proposal system: By using IBM Rational DOORS, you can manage changes to requirements via a simple predefined change proposal system or a more customizable and thorough change control workflow.
    • Linking: With IBM Rational DOORS, you can link requirements to test plans, design items, test cases, and other requirements, making traceability easier.
    • Collaboration-friendly: Business analysts, business users, systems engineers, and marketing suppliers can collaborate directly through requirements discussions.
    • Boosts productivity: IBM Rational DOORS traces requirements and eliminates manual processes and spreadsheets, thereby improving productivity.
    • Cost-efficient: Because IBM Rational DOORS effectively manages the requirements of its users, it helps reduce development costs.

    Reviews from Real Users

    Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by PeerSpot users currently using the IBM Rational DOORS solution.

    PeerSpot user Juergen A., System Engineer, Requirements Engineer, Managing Director at CCC Systems Engineering Suisse GmbH, says, “One of the most valuable features of the program is the usability. It is really simple to use and its logic, look and feel are familiar to most customers. Let's say it is more of an old-fashioned interface design. If you look at the software, you will notice that the layout is similar to the old Microsoft Windows Explorer. This is helpful to customers who have long-term experience because the look and feel is something they remember from the structure of Explorer and they find it familiar when they go to use DOORS.” He also adds, “There are several other features in the product that are valuable to users and to us. These features would have to do with the traceability and the possibilities for customization of the RP (Relying Party). This is important because several of our clients run an awful lot of customizations.”

    A Project Manager at a tech services company mentions, "We have different generations of all products. It lets us select and see unique attributes for each release or generation. You can use attributes to define a selection area to see which equipment are for the old versions and which ones are for the new versions. This inbuilt view is what I like in IBM Rational DOORS. So, for a database and a set of requirements, it will select and show unique attributes for a release or a generation."

    A Sr. Systems Engineer at a manufacturing company comments, “I like the user interface with regard to creating links between requirements and tracing links to requirements. I like the DXL Wizard, in particular, to build custom views that I save. I am a fan of the DOORS Change Proposal System, although a lot of people where I'm working have their own homegrown system. I continue to push them to migrate to the DOORS CPS.”

    Julie K., Lead Modeling & Simulation Engineer at a tech services company, explains, “Being able to track changes to requirements and being able to export is the solution's most valuable aspect.”

    PTC Integrity Requirements Connector (IRC) enables an effective and efficient method to synchronize requirements across projects, departments and enterprise boundaries. Deploying IRC across an organization ensures that requirements are communicated, processed, easily acted upon and contribute to the success of your projects. This whitepaper explains the primary reasons why IRC is indispensable in today’s world of distributed product development.

    Sample Customers
    Infosys, Chevrolet Volt
    Cummins, Continental
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Aerospace/Defense Firm24%
    Manufacturing Company24%
    Computer Software Company8%
    Transportation Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company23%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Aerospace/Defense Firm7%
    Government6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company26%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Healthcare Company8%
    Educational Organization7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise63%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise74%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise75%
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Requirements Management
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Atlassian, Siemens and others in Application Requirements Management. Updated: March 2024.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM Rational DOORS is ranked 1st in Application Requirements Management with 51 reviews while PTC Integrity Requirements Connector is ranked 6th in Application Requirements Management with 1 review. IBM Rational DOORS is rated 8.0, while PTC Integrity Requirements Connector is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM Rational DOORS writes " Offers ability to automate tasks and to track changes within documents and compare different versions of requirements but modeling capabilities could benefit from a web-based tool ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PTC Integrity Requirements Connector writes "A requirement management tool that provides a good technical support along with stability". IBM Rational DOORS is most compared with Polarion Requirements, Jira, Jama Connect, Helix ALM and 3SL Cradle, whereas PTC Integrity Requirements Connector is most compared with Jira and IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation.

    See our list of best Application Requirements Management vendors.

    We monitor all Application Requirements Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.