IBM Rational ClearQuest vs Jira comparison

The compared IBM and Atlassian solutions aren't in the same category. IBM is ranked #1 in DT , and holds a 22.7% mindshare in the category. Atlassian is ranked #1 in ALM , with an average rating of 8.5, and holds a 11.2% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Atlassian users who would recommend it.

IBM Rational ClearQuest

Read 4 IBM Rational ClearQuest reviews

949 Views
190 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Jira

Read 282 Jira reviews

19,738 Views
9,672 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

IBM Rational ClearQuest

Jira

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Rational ClearQuest

Average Rating

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Defect Tracking (1st), Software Configuration Management (5th)

Jira

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

282

Ranking in other categories

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (1st), Application Requirements Management (2nd), Project Management Software (1st)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Application Lifecycle Management solutions, they serve different purposes. IBM Rational ClearQuest is designed for Defect Tracking and holds a mindshare of 22.7%, down 50.0% compared to last year.
Jira, on the other hand, focuses on Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites, holds 11.2% mindshare, down 21.4% since last year.

Defect Tracking Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
IBM Rational ClearQuest	22.7%
Adminitrack	14.6%
Assembla Workspaces	11.9%
Other	50.800000000000004%

Defect Tracking

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Jira	11.2%
Microsoft Azure DevOps	9.5%
OpenText Application Quality Management	6.5%
Other	72.8%

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

Featured Reviews

it_user808977

Software Developer at a tech vendor with 11-50 employees

It can be adapted to any process flow

ClearQuest is a Defect Tracking system with a highly adaptable state machine together with an easy to use API, which can do all of the functions available in the GUI. This simplifies integration and automation of many steps is why the organization still uses a much older version, as there are no…

Read full review

Akhil Viswam

Senior Consultant at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Agile workflows have streamlined sprint planning and tracking for faster feature delivery

Jira has a very good interface and it is very easy to manage sprints, tasks, and epics. The main feature is the hierarchy, as features can be converted into epics and topics, allowing bigger tasks to be partitioned into smaller ones. The hierarchy feature in Jira helps the team significantly compared to other tools that have been used, such as Trello, which is mainly useful only for a waterfall model. For modern Agile practices, Jira is the most adapted tool in the industry. Another valuable feature is that Jira APIs have been used for data science projects to analyze tasks and get insights. This has also been very helpful in the project.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The combination of a highly flexible state machine together with a platform independent API enables possibilities to automate many steps that in many systems are manual."

"Customization level of the tool to meet client’s requirements, you can do almost all of the customizations for a project or ticket management system, and notification, hooks, and UI customization are very stable."

"This enabled us to completely migrate from paper-based forms to electronic forms for a number of business areas."

"In combination with a good Configuration Management plan, an organization can create an optimal level of administration and automation creating good traceability in your tasks."

"The workflow feature with stateful record types and the ability to implement these rapidly in our project have been of value to us."

"It can be adapted to any process flow and easily be integrated with other in-house tools using the ClearQuest API."

"Integrates with other components."

"It helps me to use virtual Scrum boards across four locations, three time zones, and to plan my work. It fully supports the Scrum approach, and the Agile way of working, and it has Agile thinking behind it.."

"It helps me to use virtual Scrum boards across four locations, three time zones, and to plan my work."

"No other platform can compete on speed or search."

"Based on the flexibility that it offers us, we can adapt to different projects with different cycles."

"The user interface is simple."

"Jira queries can be used for different types of deployment automation processes."

"The agile framework works well, and I pretty much live by that. Everything, such as sprint management, is laid out."

More Jira pros

Cons

"It’s very expensive, especially considering that there are much more economical options out there."

"However, the user interface seems very static and the user experience was not the best."

"Lack of a modern web interface compared to other systems might discourage customers."

"The user interface could benefit from a more modern look and feel."

"The challenge which I frequently see from Jira is the label. When you search for a label sometimes, it suddenly disappears. If there's a mismatch due to all-caps or lower case, you won't be able to find it. It won't even come up as a recommendation or suggestion. That's something that can be really frustrating, as people create labels in their own specific ways and then no one else can find anything."

"Out-of-the-box reporting is limited. It would be helpful if more customisation was possible."

"The dashboard reports can be improved. Its dashboard reports are good, but you cannot have complex reports. They are currently very basic. For instance, we can only choose two columns for a dashboard, so it is not friendly enough."

"Integration with some of the automation tools could be improved."

"A more enhanced Service Desk module, with support for more types of alarms and the like."

"Users can be confused about how to use this tool as it's very complex."

"The hierarchy for Jira tickets is too flat."

"This solution would be improved with the inclusion of integration with SVN, and auto-sync with the build release number."

More Jira cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Worth the extra cost."

"The basic price of Jira is reasonable, but for each plugin, we have to keep paying more. When you add it all up, it can be expensive. The main problem we face is we are forced to purchases plugin licenses for users who are not going to use them. For example, we have Jira licenses for approximately 450 people but if we only want a purchase a plugin for few people it is mandatory to buy the license for the 450 people who have Jira licensees. This is a problem because sometimes we need plugins for the product manager or for people in charge of the report, not everyone. For us, it can be very expensive in the end, they should alter this policy to allow plugins for only a set number of licenses."

"As a company, we get a subsidized price, and it's lower than what's quoted on their website."

"JIRA's pricing is very economical. I would say that JIRA is a great deal more economical than Microsoft."

"The tool's pricing is expensive. The new pricing is indeed quite expensive compared to what it was a few years ago. Last year, when we intended to renew our subscription, we found the pricing considerably higher."

"We had a perpetual license but have changed to a subscription."

"The pricing for Jira is reasonable, although I think they can bring it down because the plugins cost extra."

"The licensing cost for Jira is typically around seven dollars per user, though it may vary depending on regional variations. This cost is for a subscription-based model rather than a one-time purchase. I rate its pricing a seven out of ten."

More Jira pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Defect Tracking solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,438 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

32%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	108
Midsize Enterprise	60
Large Enterprise	152

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Is Jira better or would you go with Micro Focus ALM Octane?

Hi Netanya, Basically , it all depends on the use cases for your environment and the business needs. Hope the below data may be relevant to you for identifying your needs and deciding on the approp...

See all answers

Which is better - Jira or Microsoft Azure DevOps?

Jira is a great centralized tool for just about everything, from local team management to keeping track of products and work logs. It is easy to implement and navigate, and it is stable and scalabl...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Jira?

Jira itself is fairly priced for the features it provides, but pricing is a bit higher than some alternatives, mostly because many plugins and add-ons are paid and licensed per user. So even if onl...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM Rational ClearCase vs IBM Rational ClearQuest

Compared 17% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps Server vs IBM Rational ClearQuest

Compared 15% of the time

OpenText Solutions Business Manager vs IBM Rational ClearQuest

Compared 10% of the time

Panaya Test Dynamix vs IBM Rational ClearQuest

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs IBM Rational ClearQuest

Compared 6% of the time

More IBM Rational ClearQuest Competitors

OpenText Software Delivery Management vs Jira

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Jira

Compared 5% of the time

IBM DOORS vs Jira

Compared 4% of the time

Asana vs Jira

Compared 4% of the time

monday.com vs Jira

Compared 3% of the time

More Jira Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM Rational ClearQuest vs. Panaya Test Dynamix

April 2026

Download IBM Rational ClearQuest product report

Buyer's Guide

Jira

May 2026

Download Jira product report

Also Known As

Rational ClearQuest

Jira Software

Overview

IBM Rational ClearQuest is a flexible change management tool designed to help in tracking, managing, and reporting changes in software development and engineering workflows.

Renowned for its adaptability, IBM Rational ClearQuest allows teams to streamline process control and change tracking. It aids in defect management and project management, offering comprehensive solutions for businesses aiming to enhance software quality. Its extensibility and integration capabilities serve varied industry needs, ensuring efficient workflows and enhanced collaboration. With its ability to manage and automate workflows, it enhances traceability and control over development phases.

What are IBM Rational ClearQuest's most valuable features?

Customizable Workflows: Tailor workflows to fit development processes and organizational requirements.
Defect Tracking: Efficiently tracks and manages defects across projects.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with other tools to enhance productivity.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?

Improved Traceability: Offers complete visibility over change requests and project updates.
Enhanced Team Collaboration: Facilitates better communication among team members.
Increased Efficiency: Automates processes to reduce manual workload and errors.

Industries such as telecom and finance implement IBM Rational ClearQuest to ensure rigorous process compliance and accurate change management. Its flexibility supports unique industry requirements, being a reliable tool for managing complex product development lifecycles and regulatory standards.

IBM

Jira is a comprehensive tool favored by teams for its ability to streamline project management and enhance Agile workflows. Its versatile features, such as customization options and integration capabilities, enable efficient task management and collaboration.

Jira supports Agile methodologies through its adaptability and robust functionalities. Teams benefit from its customizable workflows, enabling seamless integration with third-party applications. Despite its complexity in customization and interface challenges, Jira is invaluable for sprint planning, backlog management, and issue tracking. It provides strong reporting tools, though some users highlight areas for improvement in documentation and stability. It's especially useful for IT, development, and marketing teams to maintain productivity and effective collaboration.

What are the key features of Jira?

Customization: Allows crafting specific workflows and processes tailored to team needs.
Agile Compatibility: Supports Scrum and Kanban boards for efficient Agile practices.
API Integration: Offers robust integration options with numerous plugins and tools.
Reporting Tools: Provides detailed analytics for informed sprint planning and tracking.

What benefits should users expect from Jira?

Enhanced Collaboration: Facilitates communication and teamwork across departments.
Improved Task Management: Streamlines tracking of tasks and issues for projects.
Flexibility: Adapts to diverse team requirements through customizable features.
Efficiency: Boosts productivity with support for Agile methodologies.

Jira's implementation in software development and project management sectors underscores its suitability for managing complex projects. Its use extends to QA and marketing for organizing workflows and ensuring effective task distribution. Despite some areas needing refinement, Jira remains integral for teams aiming to boost collaboration and maintain streamlined project processes.

Atlassian

Sample Customers

Atos SE, STM, Regence BlueCross BlueShield

Square, Nasa, eBay, Cisco, SalesForce, Adobe, BNP Paribas, BMW and LinkedIn, Pfizer, Citi.

We monitor all Defect Tracking reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.