Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Infosphere Information Analyzer vs SAP Data Quality Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Infosphere Information ...
Ranking in Data Quality
12th
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SAP Data Quality Management
Ranking in Data Quality
4th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2024, in the Data Quality category, the mindshare of IBM Infosphere Information Analyzer is 2.9%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Data Quality Management is 8.8%, down from 14.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Quality
 

Featured Reviews

TR
Jun 5, 2024
Data rules, column analysis are valuable but the interface is not intuitive.
The interface is not the most friendly. Performance. There are also these following features - documented in the user guide - but do not work: 1. Global Logical Variables (GLVs) 2. Migrating projects. Neither the internal method (Export/Import) nor the command line interface (CLI) method work 100%. They sometimes error out. 3. When you open a data rule and do no modifications, when you close it, IA asks if you want to save the changes, even if you did not make any. A bit disturbing when you know you did not change anything yet you start to doubt what you think you know. My wish list for new features: 1. Ability to use functions on data sources. I do not understand how IBM could miss this. Data sources are not visible when coding custom expressions. For example if you have a field called CUSTOMER.ACCOUNT_NUM, you cannot code TRIM(ACCOUNT_NUM). My workaround is to create a variable in the rule definition then bind it in the data rule. Functions can only be applied to variables, not directly to fields. I have a rule where I do things to about 12 fields - concatenate, substring, length, coalesce, etc - and I had to make up 12 lines in the definition that do nothing but refer to these variables. I had to invent a rule so I coded seemingly useless rule conditions like address1 = address1 just so I have a variable for the field I want to code functions for. Huge oversight on the part of IBM. 2. Copy a data rule and modify the copy. Right now only rule definitions can be copied, not data rules. Sometimes I need to create two or more versions of the same rule. IA forces me to generate each of them from scratch. This is annoying when version 2 is only slightly different from version 1. If it took me an hour to code the original, it would take me close to that amount of time to code the new version. If I could copy and modify, the effort would only take maybe 5 minutes. 3. The date of last modification. IA only shows the date of creation which is generally useless. The last modification date is far more important and needs to be available and visible. 4. A file manager, a la Windows Explorer. I may want to see the list of rules and sort them by date of modification. 5. Enhanced dedup on output. Currently, IA can only exclude duplicates based on the entire record. It should allow deduping on a select set of columns. 6. Feature to select one record from multiple matches in a join. For instance, in Oracle SQL, one can FETCH FIRST ROW ONLY or use ROWNUM or TOP 1. 7. Ability to sort the output. 8. New virtual tables take a while to appear. You create one and the list doesn't list the new table. Wait 15 minutes or so and maybe it will be listed. Or log out and log back in.
Rene Dorantes - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 16, 2022
Scalable, stable, and offers good technical support
SAP Data Quality Management would be better if it directly integrates with the ME system. Right now, the company has a lot of machines on the shop floor working as a standalone, so you have to use all methods to ensure that the data interface appears on the ME system and that SAP Data Quality Management records the QM results. It would be much easier if the ME system could be integrated directly with SAP Data Quality Management. What I'd like to see from SAP Data Quality Management in the future is the integration of machines on the shop floor or a feature that connects shop floor devices. I'd also like a custom dashboard in the solution, though I wonder if that's available in the new version. The old version my company uses doesn't have that. Another feature I want in the next release of SAP Data Quality Management is better communication between the ME and the SAP systems.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"What's most useful in IBM Infosphere Information Analyzer is you can access it from anywhere. It's also pretty easy to learn, so even non-technical business people use it and found the solution easy to learn."
"You can also schedule and run data quality on the critical data elements on the databases."
"We work with API standards or norms for internal applications, so it's essential for SSE to have tests and pass those tests according to the criteria, which makes SAP Data Quality Management very important for our products."
"Our primary use case is for us to inspect the results from the product and material, and for releasing or leaving the status of the product."
 

Cons

"What could be improved or added to IBM Infosphere Information Analyzer is more connectors. This solution comes in a package with IBM InfoSphere DataStage and is missing a lot of connectors to various, new data sources, so IBM needs to work on that area. Compared with competitors such as Informatica and Alation which acquired other small companies to work on the connectors, IBM has not done any testing and has tried to develop the connectors in-house, but that's taking a lot of time. As a result, my company is unable to connect to a lot of data sources, particularly modern data sources."
"The solution is outdated and is not on cloud."
"SAP Data Quality Management would be better if it directly integrates with the ME system. Right now, the company has a lot of machines on the shop floor working as a standalone, so you have to use all methods to ensure that the data interface appears on the ME system and that SAP Data Quality Management records the QM results. It would be much easier if the ME system could be integrated directly with SAP Data Quality Management."
"I would like for them to develop a feature to able to record all of our inspections; so all the data can go through SAP. It's not user-friendly or easy to get further analysis, so we mostly skip this step."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"For the licensing cost of IBM Infosphere Information Analyzer, I have no information on the exact cost, but as it's bundled with other IBM products such as IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog and IBM InfoSphere DataStage, the bundle is expensive when compared to competitor pricing."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Quality solutions are best for your needs.
805,335 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
35%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Computer Software Company
8%
Educational Organization
7%
Manufacturing Company
17%
Energy/Utilities Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
13%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with IBM Infosphere Information Analyzer?
They have developed a new product called Watson Catalog, an upgrade from IBM Infosphere Information Analyzer. It is a cloud patch for data. The solution is outdated and is not on cloud. In addition...
What is your primary use case for IBM Infosphere Information Analyzer?
We use all the tools in their suite, and their data quality and governance are great. You can do data profiling and quality analysis with the IBM Infosphere Information Analyzer. You can also sched...
What advice do you have for others considering IBM Infosphere Information Analyzer?
I rate the solution a four out of ten. The solution is useful and can do the job, but there are other new tools in the market today.
What do you like most about SAP Data Quality Management?
We work with API standards or norms for internal applications, so it's essential for SSE to have tests and pass those tests according to the criteria, which makes SAP Data Quality Management very i...
What needs improvement with SAP Data Quality Management?
SAP Data Quality Management would be better if it directly integrates with the ME system. Right now, the company has a lot of machines on the shop floor working as a standalone, so you have to use ...
What is your primary use case for SAP Data Quality Management?
In the last three years, my company used SAP Data Quality Management for a manufacturing site, particularly for creating inspection lots, recording the results, and costing the inspection lots from...
 

Also Known As

Information Analyzer
SAP BusinessObjects Data Quality Management, BusinessObjects Data Quality Management
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Integra LifeSciences, Longjiang Bank Corp., Webster University, Swedish Armed Forces, Edith Cowan University, Premier, PRISA Digital, TIAA CREF
AOK Bundesverband, Surgutneftegas Open Joint Stock Company, Molson Coors Brewing Company, City of Buenos Aires, ASR Group, Citrix, EarlySense, Usha International Limited, Automotive Resources International, Wªrth Group, Takisada-Osaka Co. Ltd., Coelba, R
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Infosphere Information Analyzer vs. SAP Data Quality Management and other solutions. Updated: September 2024.
805,335 professionals have used our research since 2012.