IBM DevOps Test UI vs OpenText UFT One comparison

IBM DevOps Test UI

Read 8 IBM DevOps Test UI reviews

1,216 Views
707 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

OpenText UFT One

Read 90 OpenText UFT One reviews

10,771 Views
6,566 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

IBM DevOps Test UI

OpenText UFT One

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM DevOps Test UI and OpenText UFT One based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Functional Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM DevOps Test UI vs. OpenText UFT One Report (Updated: May 2024).

Buyer's Guide

IBM DevOps Test UI vs. OpenText UFT One

May 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 787,779 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

IBM DevOps Test UI

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

22nd

Ranking in Regression Testing Tools

10th

Average Rating

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText UFT One

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

2nd

Ranking in Regression Testing Tools

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile App Testing Tools (2nd), API Testing Tools (4th), Test Automation Tools (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2024, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of IBM DevOps Test UI is 0.4%, down from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText UFT One is 9.1%, down from 11.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

Unique Categories:

Regression Testing Tools

0.4%

Mobile App Testing Tools

32.7%

Featured Reviews

Hellen Zhang

Lead Systems Tester at Government of Ontario, Canada

Aug 15, 2022

Reliable test automation, and test data creation with efficient support

The solution is used for test automation, and test data creation The solution has provided more accurate results with database verification. Test automation is most valuable because it saves a lot of time. The solution can be improved by removing the need for object matching in the framework.…

Read full review

reviewer1949529

Head of Testing - Warehouse Solutions at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Aug 30, 2022

Outstanding UFT solution, but there are issues with the scripting

We are currently using it for migration Micro Focus UFT One is useful. However, there is an issue with the scripts. We are going to collaborate with multiple automatic specialists to identify the problem. If we can fix the issue, we will continue with UFT, otherwise, we'll switch to other…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the UI component tester."

"Test automation is most valuable because it saves a lot of time."

"It is compatible with all sorts of Dark Net applications. Its coverage is very good."

"IBM Rational Functional Tester is very contextual."

"The production and the efficiency of making your test cases can be very high."

"Record and Replay to ease onboarding of new users."

"Being able to automate different applications makes day-to-day activities a lot easier."

"The most valuable features for us are the GUI, the easy identification of objects, and folder structure creation."

"I like the fact that we can use LeanFT with our UFT licenses as well."

"The high-level security, high standard and compatible SAP are great."

"It helps in identifying defects earlier. With manual testing, that 15-day timeline meant there were times when we would find defects on the 11th or 12th day of the cycle, but with automation we are able to run the complete suite within a day and we are able to find the failures. It helps us to provide early feedback."

"UFT is very strongly built. It's widely used, so there's a lot of support."

More OpenText UFT One pros

Cons

"The latest version has increased load time before testing can be run."

"They need to do a complete revamp so that even a non-technical person can manage the tool."

"As many of our products are moving from PC to mobile, the most important thing that this solution needs is mobile app support."

"If the solution is running on Linux, there are some issues around application compatibility."

"The UA objects are sometimes hard to recognize, so the coverage should be increased. Open-source alternatives have a broad scope. Also, it's sometimes difficult to make connections between two of the components in the UFT mobile center. It should be easier to set up the wireless solution because we have to set both. We directly integrate Selenium and APM, so we should try to cover all the features they have in APM and Selenium with the UFT mobile."

"One thing that confused me, and now just mildly irritates me, is that we migrated from QuickTest Pro to HP UFT, Unified Functional Test. After we did the migration, it turned out that we didn't really have Unified Functional Test at all."

"Scripting has become more complex from a maintenance standpoint to support additional browsers."

"I would like to have detailed description provided to test the cloud-based applications."

"The solution is expensive."

"One of the drawbacks is that mobile performance testing is in need of improvement."

"We'd like it to have less scripting."

"The overall design needs an entire overhaul. We prefer software designed to ensure the package isn't too loaded."

More OpenText UFT One cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Licensing is good but the prices for the products are expensive. A single-user license may go for something like $10,000 to $30,000. There are no additional costs, and support is included within that price."

"The price is one aspect that could be improved."

"We have ALM licensing, and the tool is free of cost."

"The licensing cost is high. There are no additional costs to the standard license."

"Compared to other tools in the market, UFT One is very competitive. The recent Covid pandemic situation also hit customer budgets significantly, so Micro Focus offered some discounted prices, which is definitely competitive."

"The way the pricing model works is that you pay a whole boatload year one. Then, every year after, it is around half or less. Because instead of paying for the new product, you are just paying for the support and maintenance of it. That is probably one of the biggest things that I hear from most people, even at conferences, "Yeah, I would love to use UFT One, but we don't have a budget for it.""

"There are no additional costs involved apart from the standard license."

"The licensing and pricing model is confusing."

"It's a yearly subscription. There are no additional costs to the standard subscription."

More OpenText UFT One pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

787,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

23%

Financial Services Firm

18%

Energy/Utilities Company

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Rational Functional Tester?

Test automation is most valuable because it saves a lot of time.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Rational Functional Tester?

The solution can be improved by removing the need for object matching in the framework. The latest version has increased load time before testing can be run. The reason is that changes were made to...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM Rational Functional Tester?

The solution is used for test automation, and test data creation.

See all answers

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?

We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT One?

My company has not had an issue with OpenText UFT One since we have been using it for the past three to four years.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT One?

The product wasn't easy for developers to learn and pick up in the area revolving around scripting for automation, and there was a lot of resistance from developers, causing my company to rely on s...

See all answers

Comparisons

Katalon Studio vs IBM DevOps Test UI

Compared 21% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs IBM DevOps Test UI

Compared 21% of the time

Selenium HQ vs IBM DevOps Test UI

Compared 18% of the time

HCL OneTest vs IBM DevOps Test UI

Compared 17% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs IBM DevOps Test UI

Compared 6% of the time

More IBM DevOps Test UI Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 29% of the time

OpenText UFT Developer vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 11% of the time

Katalon Studio vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 10% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 5% of the time

UiPath Test Suite vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText UFT One Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

May 2024

Download IBM DevOps Test UI product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText UFT One

June 2024

Download OpenText UFT One product report

Also Known As

IBM Rational Functional Tester

Micro Focus UFT One, UFT (QTP), Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro, QuickTest Professional, HPE UFT (QTP)

Learn More

Video not available

IBM

OpenText

Overview

IBM DevOps Test UI, also known as Rational Functional Tester, is a software tool designed for automated functional and regression testing of Graphical User Interfaces (GUIs) and data-driven testing. It automates the testing process to ensure application functionalities work as intended and identifies any issues caused by new code changes. The tool is tailored for GUI testing, allowing for easy recording and playback of test cases that interact with UI elements like buttons and menus. It supports data-driven testing, enabling comprehensive tests across various data sets. Additionally, it offers visual editing features with screenshot representations for easy test creation and ScriptAssure technology to maintain test scripts even if the UI changes.

Our AI-powered functional testing tool accelerates test automation. It works across desktop, web, mobile, mainframe, composite, and packaged enterprise-grade applications. Read white paper

Sample Customers

Edumate

Sage, JetBlue, Haufe.Group, Independent Health, Molina Healthcare, Cox Automotive, andTMNA Services

Buyer's Guide

IBM DevOps Test UI vs. OpenText UFT One

May 2024

Free Report: IBM DevOps Test UI vs. OpenText UFT One

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM DevOps Test UI vs. OpenText UFT One and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

787,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM DevOps Test UI vs. OpenText UFT One report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.