We performed a comparison between IBM DataPower Gateway and Oracle Service Bus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is the security appliance, it's very secure."
"I like that it is very stable, and we never experience any downtime."
"The scalability of the solution is good."
"What I like most is the stability."
"The solution is scalable, our customers are mostly South African banks and they handle mostly transactions with this solution."
"It's high-speed and it can be remotely administered via an API."
"The solution is very easy to work with."
"It is a scalable solution."
"There are always continuous improvements that are happening."
"Monitoring feature that allows tracking of the web's UI development."
"What I like most about Oracle Service Bus is that you can use it for many integrations. For example, you can use it for on-premises to on-premises integrations, on-premises to cloud integrations, and cloud to on-premises integrations."
"The most valuable feature is the adapters."
"Overall it is a pretty good solution."
"It is lightweight and one can easily integrate with different applications, databases, JMS, or web services through different protocols."
"The stability is consistently high, with only one notable issue encountered."
"The interface is fine and the solution is quite robust."
"The product's cost for data appliances or hardware is quite high. It needs improvement."
"The initial setup isn't so easy, you need who has experience working with the solution to help."
"Some pre-packaged connectors for integration with various applications, such as SaaS offerings, would be a useful addition."
"Its support services could be better."
"Making it more user-friendly would be an improvement."
"The components that they include in the product that are, in fact, a WTX, really need to be removed from the product because they tend to fail."
"They should add features to manage API integrations."
"For the workloads that are not too high, appliance is a little bit expensive."
"If they can containerize this, that would be nice. If they can provide docker images and offer support for those containers, that would be great."
"There are issues, especially if you want to create some compensation in your service bin."
"The connectivity with the solution is an area that needs to be improved. On occasion, requests are lost due to losing connectivity."
"It needs to support more adapters, because the integration points keep changing and new things keep coming up. It also needs to be more scalable."
"Lacks sufficient cloud compatibility."
"There is significant room for improvement in the monitoring capabilities."
"The interface console is very slow. Even in production, we need to increase the RAM or CPU. And even after that, the performance is still not good in production."
"It would be ideal if they could optimize it a bit."
IBM DataPower Gateway is ranked 6th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 26 reviews while Oracle Service Bus is ranked 5th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 25 reviews. IBM DataPower Gateway is rated 8.4, while Oracle Service Bus is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of IBM DataPower Gateway writes "Easy to use, plenty of functionality, but expensive". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Service Bus writes "Enables us to do a lot of aggregation and routing, but API response can be a problem if the payload is heavy". IBM DataPower Gateway is most compared with IBM API Connect, Apigee, Microsoft Azure API Management, Mule ESB and IBM Integration Bus, whereas Oracle Service Bus is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Integration Bus, webMethods Integration Server, Red Hat Fuse and JBoss ESB. See our IBM DataPower Gateway vs. Oracle Service Bus report.
See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
