• Home
  • IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. Pipedream

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs Pipedream comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo
IBM Cloud Pak for Integration
Read 4 IBM Cloud Pak for Integration reviews
1,102 views|778 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Pipedream Logo
Pipedream
Read 4 Pipedream reviews
62 views|23 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. Pipedream
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Cloud Pak for Integration and Pipedream based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two API Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. Pipedream Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Neelima Golla
A hybrid integration platform that applies the functionality of closed-loop AI automation
Devansh Singh
A scalable and easy-to-use solution that provides easy-to-read documentation and can be deployed quickly
I did a web scraping task that was scheduled every 24 hours. It would have been a lengthy process if I had done the task by writing the code.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most preferable aspect would be the elimination of the command, which was a significant improvement. In the past, it was a challenge, but now we can proceed smoothly with the implementation of our policies and everything is managed through JCP. It's still among the positive aspects, and it's a valuable feature.""Cloud Pak for Integration is definitely scalable. That is the most important criteria.""The most valuable aspect of the Cloud Pak, in general, is the flexibility that you have to use the product.""It is a stable solution."

More IBM Cloud Pak for Integration Pros →

"The most valuable features of Pipedream are the prebuilt integrations that require no coding.""The solution enables users to integrate several things.""It is a developer-friendly platform that allows writing custom scripts.""The most valuable feature of Pipedream is the ability to use Python code in general."

More Pipedream Pros →

Cons
"Its queuing and messaging features need improvement.""The initial setup is not easy.""Setting up Cloud Pak for Integration is relatively complex. It's not as easy because it has not yet been fully integrated. You still have some products that are still not containerized, so you still have to run them on a dedicated VM.""The pricing can be improved."

More IBM Cloud Pak for Integration Cons →

"Documentation isn't available for everything in the solution, so you may have to figure out a lot of things by yourself.""There is a potential area for improvement in handling loop operations over items.""They should give more information about trigger failure.""We faced some server timeouts."

More Pipedream Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The solution's pricing model is very flexible."
  • "It is an expensive solution."

    • More IBM Cloud Pak for Integration Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Price-wise, for a company, it is a nice product, but for personal use, it is not very beneficial."
  • "The product price is fair and inexpensive than one of the competitors."

    • More Pipedream Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    What do you like most about IBM Cloud Pak for Integration?
    Top Answer:The most preferable aspect would be the elimination of the command, which was a significant improvement. In the past, it was a challenge, but now we can proceed smoothly with the implementation of our… more »
    Read all 4 answers   →
    What needs improvement with IBM Cloud Pak for Integration?
    Top Answer:The pricing can be improved.
    Read all 3 answers   →
    What is your primary use case for IBM Cloud Pak for Integration?
    Top Answer:The use cases involve connecting and converting data from one system to another, often involving alterations in the data's format or structure.
    Read all 3 answers   →
    What do you like most about Pipedream?
    Top Answer:It is a developer-friendly platform that allows writing custom scripts.
    Read all 3 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Pipedream?
    Top Answer:The product price is fair and inexpensive than Zapier.
    Read all 3 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Pipedream?
    Top Answer:They could provide seamless integration with Jira, similar to classic code integration. Additionally, they should give more information about trigger failure.
    Read all 3 answers   →
    Ranking
    21st
    out of 66 in API Management
    Views
    1,102
    Comparisons
    778
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    498
    Rating
    9.0
    18th
    out of 66 in API Management
    Views
    62
    Comparisons
    23
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    611
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    IBM
    Pipedream
    Overview

    IBM Cloud Pak for Integration gives you complete, flexible integration using capabilities you need to move at today's speed of business, including the tools to help you achieve your application modernization goals as part of your journey to the cloud.

    Pipedream is an innovative workflow automation platform designed to streamline and simplify complex data integrations and workflows. Its primary use case is to connect various applications, services, and APIs, enabling seamless data transfer and automation across different systems.

    The most valuable functionality of Pipedream is its ability to create and manage workflows using a visual interface. Users can easily build and customize workflows by connecting different actions and triggers, without the need for coding. Pipedream supports a wide range of triggers and actions, allowing users to automate tasks such as data extraction, transformation, and loading, as well as event-driven actions like sending notifications or updating databases.

    Pipedream helps organizations by reducing manual effort and improving efficiency. It enables teams to automate repetitive tasks, freeing up valuable time and resources. With its extensive library of pre-built integrations and connectors, Pipedream simplifies the process of connecting and integrating various systems, eliminating the need for custom development. This empowers organizations to quickly build and deploy complex workflows, accelerating their digital transformation initiatives.

    Furthermore, Pipedream provides real-time monitoring and debugging capabilities, allowing users to track the execution of workflows and troubleshoot any issues. It also offers advanced features like version control and collaboration, enabling teams to work together on building and maintaining workflows.

    Sample Customers
    CVS Health Corporation
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Government7%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise67%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. Pipedream
    March 2024
    Free Report: IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. Pipedream
    Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. Pipedream and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM Cloud Pak for Integration is ranked 21st in API Management with 4 reviews while Pipedream is ranked 18th in API Management with 4 reviews. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration is rated 8.6, while Pipedream is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of IBM Cloud Pak for Integration writes "A hybrid integration platform that applies the functionality of closed-loop AI automation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pipedream writes " A tool that ensures that its users see a return on investment from its use". IBM Cloud Pak for Integration is most compared with IBM App Connect, IBM API Connect, IBM DataPower Gateway, MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager and Microsoft Azure API Management, whereas Pipedream is most compared with . See our IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. Pipedream report.

    See our list of best API Management vendors.

    We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.