Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Case Foundation vs Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center comparison

IBM and Interfacing Technologies Corporation are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Additionally, 86% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Interfacing Technologies Corporation users who would recommend it.
IBM Case Foundation
Read 13 IBM Case Foundation reviews
  • 298 Views
  • 204 Comparison Views
86% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between IBM Case Foundation and Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Automation Anywhere and others in Business Process Management (BPM).

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Business Process Management (BPM) Report (Updated: May 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Business Process Management (BPM)
May 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 853,118 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Case Foundation
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Management (BPM) (32nd)
Interfacing Technologies En...
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Nouman Nawaz - PeerSpot reviewer
Mature product in terms of security and stable product
The architecture is a bit difficult, but in BAW, they introduced the Business Automation Workflow. It's a bit easier compared to Case Manager. Currently, we use Case Manager, so it's a bit difficult to upgrade and handle, but BAW is comparatively much better and easier to handle. The limitation is only for customization because IBM doesn't support it. In some scenarios, if you want some business processes to be customized, we have already spoken two or three times with IBM representatives that we have to customize some of the features in this business process. They would say that if you want to do this automation at your own end, then okay, fine, go ahead, but we are not supporting all this customization. The only thing is the customization because it's a complete standard application.
Read full review
SantoshKulkarni1 - PeerSpot reviewer
A Robust Solution with Enhanced Automation and Process Improvement Identification Capabilities
I recommend that users invest more time in the initial setup of the process architecture within the tool. It is crucial to spend time designing how the process architecture works as it significantly impacts how the tool behaves. This upfront investment can prevent the need for extensive reworking later on.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The client and the IBM content navigation are the solution's most valuable features."
"It provides us the capability of producing b​​usiness processes for documents that are launched immediately when a document comes into the repository."
"Case Foundation provides a strong security boost."
"It is easy to set up workflows that notify the user depending on certain events."
"It's very easy."
"The most valuable feature is the content manager part of the file as it is very stable, robust, and reliable."
"The solution is scalable."
"The only thing is that we can easily track where the application is in the process, from manual to automation."
More IBM Case Foundation pros
"The most valuable feature is the integrated manner in which all the capabilities of the Enterprise Process Center platform work together and make it easier to complete the documentation of processes."
"One notable software-related benefit from a user perspective is our improved ability to identify opportunities for automation and process enhancement just by gaining a clearer view of the processes. There are two valuable aspects. First, setting up the process architecture is commendable. Second, not having to maintain different versions of processes is a notable benefit. The solution is stable. The support team is responsive."
 

Cons

"There is a need for more open and flexible integration capabilities, allowing seamless collaboration with a broader spectrum of business process management solutions, beyond the confines of IBM's document management offerings."
"IBM needs to update the user interfaces of all its products to make them more intuitive and accessible to beginners. Compared to Microsoft products, IBM solutions are less user-friendly. IBM programs are hard to master. It's a problem in my region because it's hard to find IT staff who can work with IBM."
"The interface needs to be more user-friendly."
"​The place of improvement is merging or combining all of the workflow functionality into one seamless tool. Now, there are multiple installations that are different. Case Foundation, before you can put Case Manager and you've got IBM BPM, and the roadmap is there to merge them altogether. But that's the struggle at the moment, it's having multiple installations and disparate workflow applications.​"
"The solution can be quite expensive."
"Comparing the solution with other interfaces, IBM BPM is much better than Case Foundation. They need to make this solution's interface more user-friendly."
"The service as it currently stands is out-of-date and lacks flexibility."
"90% of the feedback we receive states that the UI is not very user-friendly."
More IBM Case Foundation cons
"However, on the process mining side, there's potential for improvement to gain deeper insights into process functionality. Additionally, there's always room for enhancement in the user interface."
"As with all such platforms, Enterprise Process Center is a complex tool and there are many capabilities and features that take time to learn."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is in the mid-range, it is not cheap, but it's not expensive."
"IBM Case Foundation is a little expensive."
"This is not an expensive solution and we are using the standard license."
"The price falls in the middle range—not overly expensive but not extremely affordable either."
"My advice for anybody who is implementing this product is to understand what options you believe you are going to want to implement and rollout in the first three to five years, but spend the most time understanding what the set-up costs and pricing will be in the first two or maybe three."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
853,118 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Government
15%
Insurance Company
11%
University
9%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Case Foundation?
A valuable feature includes seamless integration with the document management system, along with robust capabilities in analytics and reporting.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Case Foundation?
It was affordable, but right now, ten years later, the cost of the product is extremely high. That's why we are looking for another product.
See all answers
What needs improvement with IBM Case Foundation?
The architecture is a bit difficult, but in BAW, they introduced the Business Automation Workflow. It's a bit easier compared to Case Manager. Currently, we use Case Manager, so it's a bit difficul...
See all answers
What do you like most about Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center?
One notable software-related benefit from a user perspective is our improved ability to identify opportunities for automation and process enhancement just by gaining a clearer view of the processe...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center?
While we have yet to explore the tool's capabilities fully, I can't think of any immediate drawbacks. However, on the process mining side, there's potential for improvement to gain deeper insights ...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center?
We use the solution for finance processes, specifically for accounts payable and accounts receivable.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

IBM Business Automation Workflow vs IBM Case Foundation Logo
IBM Business Automation Workflow vs IBM Case Foundation
Compared 100% of the time
More IBM Case Foundation Competitors
No data available
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
IBM Case Foundation
May 2025
IBM Case Foundation reportDownload IBM Case Foundation product report
Buyer's Guide
BI (Business Intelligence) Tools
May 2025
Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center reportDownload Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center product report
 

Also Known As

Case Foundation, FileNet Business Process Manager
Enterprise Process Center
 

Overview

IBM Case Foundation is for organizations that need to harness unstructured information and integrate it with business processes to drive critical business decisions. It enables organizations to create, manage and optimize case-based processes and is designed to decrease development costs while significantly improving process performance. Case Foundation links specific pieces of content with a structured workflow. It's an on ramp for organizations that choose to move from document-centric workflow solutions to the advanced capabilities of IBM Case Manager.
IBM

Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center by Interfacing Technologies Corporation integrates AI-powered enterprise software for managing operations, ensuring compliance, and driving improvement in regulated organizations.

Combining QMS, DMS, BPM, and GRC within a single platform, Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center standardizes processes and reduces risk. It provides real-time insights and adapts to changing regulations, designed for industries like aerospace and life sciences. With ISO 27001 certification, GDPR, and CFR Part 11 compliance, it meets strict global security standards. Recognized by Gartner as a leader in DTO solutions, this platform offers precision and transparency through 25 years of expertise.

What features make Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center valuable?
  • Quality Management: Enhances efficiency and compliance in processes.
  • Document Management: Centralizes information and ensures traceability.
  • Business Process Management: Automates workflows for operational excellence.
  • Governance, Risk & Compliance: Provides control and audit readiness.
What should users look for in reviews?
  • Operational Insight: Real-time insights into processes for better decisions.
  • Risk Reduction: Minimizes compliance risks and enhances security.
  • Adaptability: Quickly responds to changes in regulatory landscapes.

In aerospace and life sciences, Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center implementation ensures compliance and operational control. It's crucial for manufacturing and government sectors seeking adaptability and precision due to their complex regulatory requirements.

Interfacing Technologies Corporation
 

Sample Customers

Suncorp Group Limited
Pepsi-Cola Manufacturing International Ltd., Pfizer Deutschland GmbH, GlaxoSmithKline, Johnson & Johnson, Bayer S.p.A., KPMG, Royal Australian Air, Orange
Buyer's Guide
Business Process Management (BPM)
May 2025
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Automation Anywhere and others in Business Process Management (BPM). Updated: May 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
853,118 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.