We performed a comparison between IBM Business Automation Workflow and Red Hat Polymita Business Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."It is the only product that includes capture content management and a process suite, as well as rules in RPA."
"It performs the basic tasks that are required for the BBM solution as part of the overall integration with ECM or enterprise contact management."
"It has had a positive effect on decision-making in my organization. It helps us with our dispute process."
"IBM Business Automation Workflow is useful for helping us design custom user interfaces and processes we require."
"It has integrated UI and deployment models, and it has a deep set of consultant and service provider ecosystem features."
"The business process modeling is the most valuable feature."
"It provides a solution for integration orchestration. This solution is for any organization in the banking, telecommunications, healthcare, manufacturing, and all domains and industries."
"The solution reduces the time to the resolution which is essential for businesses."
"The main factor that separates Red Hat software from Oracle, IBM, Pegasystems, is the ability that it gives you to design the screens outside the software and connect it as another component with the BPM engine."
"Integrating the solution with existing systems can be complicated and it needs careful planning and execution."
"IBM Business Automation Workflow could improve the integration."
"One significant challenge is the lack of accessible forums or resources to seek help or information when problems arise."
"The SCADA Systems are very sophisticated and have a hard time integrating with our older scales. The technical support in regards to the partner side needs some improvement."
"I would like to see more streamlined install and provisioning; preferably containerized IBM BPM would be helpful."
"The initial setup is actually a really complicated process."
"The development UI is sometimes a little slow."
"Sometimes, we feel like we are not getting the full features of the content management capabilities."
"I think the documentation for the tool, the official documentation, is not as strong as in other tools. You have lot of community. That is good. But sometimes you need - when you are working on a big client or a critical process - to be certain about certain things. So I think that the documentation for the tool, from the company, could be a little stronger."
More IBM Business Automation Workflow Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Red Hat Polymita Business Suite Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
IBM Business Automation Workflow is ranked 13th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 21 reviews while Red Hat Polymita Business Suite is ranked 48th in Business Process Management (BPM). IBM Business Automation Workflow is rated 7.6, while Red Hat Polymita Business Suite is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of IBM Business Automation Workflow writes "Good for case management, integration capabilities but lacks stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat Polymita Business Suite writes "Gives you the ability to design the screens outside the software and connect them as a component with the BPM engine". IBM Business Automation Workflow is most compared with IBM BPM, Camunda, Apache Airflow, IBM Case Foundation and AWS Step Functions, whereas Red Hat Polymita Business Suite is most compared with .
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
