IIS and IBM BPM compete in the web hosting and business process management domains respectively. IIS appears to hold the upper hand in cost-effectiveness and ease of use, while IBM BPM is favored for its advanced capabilities in process automation and integration.
Features: IIS is known for its seamless integration with Windows OS, ensuring easy hosting for websites without requiring a separate license. It features bandwidth limitation, providing control over resource usage and enhancing performance. Additionally, IIS offers robust security options essential for maintaining the stability and reliability of web applications. In contrast, IBM BPM focuses on expansive process modeling capabilities, providing a comprehensive SOA infrastructure suited for complex business environments. It excels in system integration and adaptability, offering flexible tools for efficient business process automation and effective monitoring features.
Room for Improvement: IIS struggles with compatibility issues regarding non-Microsoft solutions, limiting platform flexibility and integration capabilities. It also faces challenges in monitoring and troubleshooting, indicating areas where security features could be enhanced. IBM BPM, while powerful, is often criticized for its complex installation process and performance issues when scaling. Its integration processes can be cumbersome, requiring a higher level of technical skill for effective operation, which can be daunting for new users.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IIS benefits from its integration within the Windows ecosystem, making deployment straightforward in on-premises setups, though hybrid and cloud configurations are possible. Microsoft's customer service varies, with many users relying on community support for assistance. On the other hand, IBM BPM's deployment is versatile, spanning on-premises and hybrid cloud environments. Although its setup and configuration are intensive, the platform's features are highly valued post-deployment. However, IBM's customer service remains a point of contention, often lacking in responsiveness and availability.
Pricing and ROI: IIS incurs no additional cost beyond the Windows Server license, presenting an economical choice with ROI realized through better website management and operational efficiencies. IBM BPM, however, requires a significant upfront investment, which can be justified for larger enterprises through its advanced capabilities. These enterprises may leverage its comprehensive features for substantial ROI, primarily through improved process automation and integration across business functions.
The customer service is outstanding.
On a scale from 1 to 10, support deserves a rating of 7 to 8.
We had a contract that provided on-site support, which was very satisfactory.
There are typically no significant issues.
Microsoft provides a lot of online documentation to consult before speaking to an expert.
The solution has scalability issues; on a scale, I would rate it at eight out of ten.
The architecture of the solution offers scalability; we can scale both vertically and horizontally.
I found IBM BPM to be scalable to a certain level but it struggled with large volumes of concurrent transactions.
I would rate the scalability of IIS as a six, mainly due to integration issues since it cannot integrate with other environments.
It depends on the server environment and the presence of a UPS for power backup.
I would give it a nine out of ten for stability.
I would rate IIS's stability as an eight out of ten.
Technologies evolve day by day, especially with the emergence of artificial intelligence and generative AI models.
IBM BPM also lacks smaller solutions, so I must purchase multiple solutions to start with workflows and applications.
It's influenced by the server's service performance.
If I compare IIS to other web servers such as Apache, which can be deployed in other environments like Linux, I find IIS is mostly used for simple things.
SAP is more expensive, but IBM BPM is very expensive.
If you have a Windows license, there is no additional cost for IIS.
The integration capabilities of IBM BPM are excellent.
It is easy to publish websites with SSL, and it integrates well within the local environment and cloud.
The configurations are simple, making it very easy to use and to set up everything.
IBM BPM is a business process management tool that provides a robust set of tools to author, test, and deploy business processes, as well as full visibility and insight to managing those business processes. The solution provides tooling and run time for process design, execution, monitoring, and optimization, along with basic system integration support. To support various levels of complexity and involvement with business process management, there are two different editions of the product: IBM BPM and IBM BPM Express.
IBM BPM Features
IBM BPM has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:
IBM BPM Benefits
There are many benefits to implementing IBM BPM. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:
Reviews from Real Users
IBM BPM is a solution that stands out when compared to many of its competitors. Some of its major advantages are that it’s good for developing complex apps, is robust, and has helpful team management and process performance features.
Zoran C., Owner/CEO at IT SPHERE, says, “It is perfect if you have to develop complex apps without much coding (only java script). It is also good if you don't have much IT resources in your company and would like to involve business analysts in the process of developing apps. My opinion is that it can do about 50% of all developers' work.”
Suhas V., BPM Architect at GBM, mentions, “Overall the solution is robust and has the ability to integrate with any product for complex workflows."
A BPM Consultant at a financial services firm comments, "Some of the features that I like the most are team management and process performance. They are both very useful and very powerful with regard to the workflow."
A Digital Banking & Innovation Director at a financial services firm expresses, “The processing functionality makes it easy to change processes and workflows easily.”
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
