QlikView vs ibi WebFOCUS comparison

QlikView and ibi WebFOCUS compete in the business intelligence sector. QlikView seems to have the upper hand due to its cost-effectiveness and ease of deployment, while ibi WebFOCUS provides extensive functionality that may justify its higher price.

Features: QlikView offers powerful data visualization, ad hoc reporting, and an interactive graphical interface. Its in-memory processing and associative querying enable quick and flexible data analysis. On the other hand, ibi WebFOCUS excels in data integration, comprehensive data management, and embedded analytics, providing advanced security and large-scale reporting capabilities.

Room for Improvement: QlikView can improve in scalability for massive datasets and augment its drag-and-drop feature to match competitors. Additional script automation and integration with non-standard database sources are also areas to explore. ibi WebFOCUS might benefit from plans that cater to smaller businesses, reducing dependencies on internal resources for deployment, and enhancing user-friendly customization options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: QlikView facilitates a straightforward deployment process with robust customer support, making it appealing for a variety of businesses. ibi WebFOCUS, while also offering solid customer service, involves more configuration during deployment but offers tailored solutions for complex enterprises, appealing to those requiring extensive customization and integration.

Pricing and ROI: QlikView is praised for its cost-effectiveness, offering quick ROI due to its user-friendly platform and lower implementation costs. Ibi WebFOCUS, requiring a larger initial investment, promises higher long-term benefits owing to its extensive capabilities. For cost-sensitive buyers, QlikView remains attractive, while ibi WebFOCUS can deliver significant returns for complex data needs over time.