Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Hub for Teams vs Huddle comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Hub for Teams
Ranking in Content Collaboration Platforms
36th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Huddle
Ranking in Content Collaboration Platforms
31st
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Use Hub for Teams?
Share your opinion
it_user669327 - PeerSpot reviewer
With a dispersed team, we set permissions on files that are relevant to each team.
We use Huddle to store important team files. With a dispersed team, we set permissions on files that are relevant to each team. This helps us keep files up to date, as well as to streamline projects For file sharing, we were working on a pitch for a European-based client and our team was broken…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Content Collaboration Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
850,671 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
AKQA, beats by dre, UK Cabinet Office, Centrica, ComCast, Commonwealth Secretariat, UK Department for Culture Media and Sport, US Department of Homeland Security, UK Education Funding Agency, Epson, Go-Ahead, Grant Thornton, KIA, KPMG, Megger, UK Ministry of Justice, NASA, US Department of Defense, P&G Prestige, Panasonic, Pearson, QinetiQ, Sony
Find out what your peers are saying about Dropbox, Microsoft, Google and others in Content Collaboration Platforms. Updated: April 2025.
850,671 professionals have used our research since 2012.