We performed a comparison between Huawei FusionStorage and Quantum ActiveScale based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two File and Object Storage solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"Provides easy access to our data."
"Workflow is easy to manage and maintain."
"The technology is stable which is good."
"Their cloud services could be improved."
"Lacks some ability to integrate with different systems."
"We would like to see a self-sufficient installation."
Huawei FusionStorage is ranked 16th in File and Object Storage with 1 review while Quantum ActiveScale is ranked 15th in File and Object Storage with 2 reviews. Huawei FusionStorage is rated 7.0, while Quantum ActiveScale is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Huawei FusionStorage writes "Provides easy access to data; cloud services are somewhat lacking in maturity". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Quantum ActiveScale writes "Good performance and reliable but the setup is complex". Huawei FusionStorage is most compared with Google Cloud Storage, Red Hat Ceph Storage, Dell ECS, Scality RING8 and Dropbox, whereas Quantum ActiveScale is most compared with Dell ECS, Qumulo, Dell PowerScale (Isilon), Red Hat Ceph Storage and NetApp StorageGRID.
See our list of best File and Object Storage vendors.
We monitor all File and Object Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
