Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

HPE Zerto Software vs Vision Solutions Double-Take comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and IBM are both solutions in the Disaster Recovery (DR) Software category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #1 with an average rating of 9.0, while IBM is ranked #32. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 7.3% mindshare in DRS, compared to IBM’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of IBM users who would recommend it.
HPE Zerto Software
Read 346 HPE Zerto Software reviews
  • 15,919 Views
  • 8,437 Comparison Views
98% willing to recommend
Vision Solutions Double-Take
Read 4 Vision Solutions Double-Take reviews
  • 890 Views
  • 507 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 22, 2026

Vision Solutions Double-Take and HPE Zerto Software are competing in the data protection and disaster recovery market. HPE Zerto Software appears to have the upper hand with its advanced features, although Vision Solutions Double-Take is more competitively priced.

Features: Vision Solutions Double-Take offers real-time byte-level replication, full server migration, and SQL migrations. HPE Zerto Software provides analytical and reporting monitoring, ransomware protection, and orchestration for automated failover.

Room for Improvement: Vision Solutions Double-Take could improve by enhancing its analytical capabilities, offering more robust ransomware protection, and expanding its orchestration features. HPE Zerto Software may benefit from simplifying deployment, better supporting Hyper-V environments, and broadening its analytical feature set to compete with external analytics tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Vision Solutions Double-Take is straightforward to deploy with comprehensive support, making it appealing for easy implementation needs. HPE Zerto Software, despite its complexity, provides thorough documentation and support which is ideal for detailed setup guidance.

Pricing and ROI: Vision Solutions Double-Take offers a cost-effective setup with quicker ROI, suited for organizations with tight budgets. In contrast, HPE Zerto Software, although requiring a higher initial investment, provides potential long-term value through its robust feature set, making it attractive for enterprises focusing on comprehensive disaster recovery needs.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed HPE Zerto Software vs. Vision Solutions Double-Take Report (Updated: March 2026).
Buyer's Guide
HPE Zerto Software vs. Vision Solutions Double-Take
March 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 884,933 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

HPE Zerto Software
Ranking in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software
1st
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
346
Ranking in other categories
Backup and Recovery (2nd), Cloud Migration (1st), Cloud Backup (2nd)
Vision Solutions Double-Take
Ranking in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software
32nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
Data Replication (13th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Disaster Recovery (DR) Software category, the mindshare of HPE Zerto Software is 7.3%, down from 10.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Vision Solutions Double-Take is 1.3%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Disaster Recovery (DR) Software Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
HPE Zerto Software7.3%
Vision Solutions Double-Take1.3%
Other91.4%
Disaster Recovery (DR) Software
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2802231 - PeerSpot reviewer
reviewer2802231
Dev Ops Engineer at a media company with 201-500 employees
Near-zero downtime has protected critical workloads and now simplifies hybrid cloud recovery
The best features of HPE Zerto Software are mainly very sophisticated and relevant to the current market. The data protection CDP part has real-time replication, unlike other solutions that have snapshot backups. We can set it up hourly, making it ideal for use with workloads. Another attraction is the near-zero RTO, with automated failover within minutes and one-click failover and failback. Currently, we are using a hybrid cloud solution, and HPE Zerto Software supports multi-cloud environments, making it easy to migrate between on-premises and cloud. Regarding the impact of HPE Zerto Software on our RTOs, we have near-zero RTO, meaning the system must be back online within thirty minutes if we measure the time. It is very quick to recover services. With HPE Zerto Software's near-synchronous replication, we have some CDP protection, so we typically write interceptions along with some asynchronous replication. There is almost real-time replication available.
Read full review
it_user710520 - PeerSpot reviewer
it_user710520
Migration Specialist at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
It gives us the possibility to migrate/protect customer servers and data in the simplest way
Full server migration possibility and SQL migrations It gives us the possibility to migrate/protect customer servers and data in the simplest way. Linux compatibility SQL migrations GUI For over a year. Not such a good coverage of the most widely used Linux server distributions, so many…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Another big attraction is the near zero RPO. A lot of other products have minutes, half-hour, or an hour RPO. We have proof indicating that Zerto is near zero, or a matter of minutes, as far as the RTO is concerned. So again, that's another attractive offering where you can actually fail something over and bring that back up in a target location in a matter of minutes. Meaning very little data loss as far as recovery time. It's fantastic."
"The most valuable feature is real-time replication, where we have the ability to recover things in near real-time."
"Zerto's continuous data protection is unmatched. It's phenomenal. It's also very easy to use. The menus are self-explanatory. Once you understand the terminology of the product, what the VPGs (Virtual Protected Groups) are, you're able to pretty much do what you want in the product. It's very easy to use."
"The Move feature is the most valuable feature because it allows us to move the VM from our old environment to our new environment with minimal disruption."
"A great Zerto feature is the non-intrusive failover of the application, similar to an actual disaster recovery test without impacting the services that are currently online. Sometimes customers need to failover to an isolated environment and validate an application without impacting the production environment: we can achieve this goal with Zerto. Again, we can do regular testing in a non-impactful way using isolated testing. For customers of our DRaaS we include once a year, a live test that is more like what would happen if the customer lost the production site. Near-synchronous replication is one of the benefits of Zerto that drove us to choose it over some others. With typical backup and recovery solutions, the recovery point typically is about 24 hours. With the near-synchronous replication, recovery point objectives tend to be minutes or a few seconds if the bandwidth is adequate. That's one of the major benefits of Zerto: there's no need to run incremental backups every xx minutes. And the recovery time is fairly quick as well, like a shutdown and reboot of a VM. Eventually, the VPGs (Virtual Protection Groups) allow to grouping of one or more VMs into a single entity, ensuring every point in time inserted into Zerto’s journal (a checkpoint) is from the same point in time for all components within the protection group. This allows easy recovery of an entire application and its dependencies to a consistent point in time. Zerto is also a very easy product to use."
"I found VM level replication and being able to group the VM levels to be valuable. I like not having to worry about whether a particular VM is in the right storage group; some of those sorts of things would trip us up previously."
"Zerto is excellent."
"The fact that we are able to test the failover of live systems during regular hours is invaluable to our organization."
More HPE Zerto Software pros
"Customer Service: Second to none Technical Support: Second to none"
"It takes less time to replicate files between two servers."
"In Version 7.xx the most valuable feature to me is being able to carry out a test full server failover in which case the primary server is still up and running."
"It gives us the possibility to migrate/protect customer servers and data in the simplest way."
 

Cons

"The only thing we've noticed that needs improvement is the backend cleanup within VMware. There are some little issues there. I would like to see tighter integration with Vmware... orphan data is an issue within VMware. It doesn't clean up properly when you're moving stuff around."
"The version 10 update 4 took really long to deploy, and we had to back off and do update 2 because that seems to deploy much quicker."
"The amount of storage that it takes up for the journals could use improvement. Outside of that, it's been great."
"I hope that in the future the product will offer integrated encryption functionalities, so that the VPN setup between protected and protection site can become optional."
"There are a couple of areas in the interface that are not very intuitive. Most of them are pretty easy, but there are a few areas in the journal and replication that, unless you've done it before, you really have no idea what to do."
"My input would be to have their sales engineers not overpromise and then have the product underdeliver because we were scoped not-appropriately sized target hardware. That hit us hard. We went with Exagrid as our target. Because of incorrect sizing, we didn't get the expected compression, and we ran out of space. We didn't have enough capacity for all of our backups the way we wanted them tiered. It crippled Zerto as well."
"Zerto can improve the dashboard by making it even more simple. Right now, there's a lot on the dashboard, and it can be overwhelming. If you're an experienced user, then you'll find it easy to use, but if you're a beginner, it will take you some time."
"The tool must improve its long-term storage cloud strategy, making it more seamless and improving the solution's downtime features."
More HPE Zerto Software cons
"Not such a good coverage of the most widely used Linux server distributions, so many issues happen while migrating these servers."
"Yes I encountered issues with deployment. The information provided in the guide just stated about 2 or 3 communication ports but even after these ports are enabled there are still issues with the 2 servers communicating via Double-Take."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"In general, it's pretty fair because it is software. In our case, we built our own colo. So, the cost of the colo was very expensive, and that's where a lot of the equipment is. The same thing is there if we were going to spin up in the cloud, but as a solution, in general, it's pretty fair for what you get out of it and how it works. It's not cheap, but at the same time, you get what you pay for, and it's definitely worth the cost. You just have to understand that the cost of the software alone is not the total cost of the project of doing ransomware protection or disaster recovery. It's a piece of the pie, not the entire pie."
"The pricing is top tier but offers good value."
"Zerto is not cheap but is an invaluable asset."
"It initially seemed a little pricey, but in the big picture, you're paying for peace of mind. It could always be cheaper and more competitive, which would make it an easier choice for people, but I can see both ways. They can say this cost is for the value they are providing. If anything happens, they can recover your data very quickly. You won't be losing it, so there is a win. It is a win-win."
"Obviously, it would be nice to have it for free. Nevertheless, a lot of effort has gone into making it a top-notch product. An excellent product with expert support is never going to be cheap. I think it's fairly priced for what it does and the benefit it brings to our business."
"I am not very involved with the pricing, but from my understanding, it is fairly expensive for us. This is why we limit its use to our tier-one customers. We have other disaster recovery solutions for our other customers due to the cost."
"While we find the twenty-five VM license somewhat inflexible, the actual setup costs are minimal as the product is so easy to install."
"If it were easier to license, and to scale it out a little bit more economically, that'd be a godsend. At the end of the day, my druthers would be to have all 200 of our servers protected by this platform. But for a company our size, that stretches our IT budget and it just doesn't make economic sense."
More HPE Zerto Software pricing and cost advice
Information not available
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user159711 - PeerSpot reviewer
it_user159711
Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Nov 9, 2014
VMware SRM vs. Veeam vs. Zerto
Disaster recovery planning is something that seems challenging for all businesses. Virtualization in addition to its operational flexibility, and cost reduction benefits, has helped companies improve their DR posture. Virtualization has made it easier to move machines from production to…
Read full review
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Healthcare Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Performing Arts
10%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Comms Service Provider
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business90
Midsize Enterprise92
Large Enterprise195
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise4
 

Questions from the Community

What advice do you have for others considering Oracle Data Guard?
Ik fluister:VM Host Oracle en DataGuard hebben we per toeval vervangen door Zerto :-) tijdens de Zerto implementatie en VPG werden de Host Data in write-ack Block-Level gerepliceerd. Qua licentie 1...
See all answers
What do you like most about Zerto?
Its ability to roll back if the VM or the server that you are recovering does not come up right is also valuable. You have the ability to roll back a few seconds or a few minutes. The rollback feat...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zerto?
From a pricing standpoint, HPE Zerto Software was reasonably priced initially compared to SRM, but now it is almost on par, if not better.
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

Veeam Data Platform vs HPE Zerto Software Logo
Veeam Data Platform vs HPE Zerto Software
Compared 12% of the time
VMware Live Recovery vs HPE Zerto Software Logo
VMware Live Recovery vs HPE Zerto Software
Compared 5% of the time
Rubrik vs HPE Zerto Software Logo
Rubrik vs HPE Zerto Software
Compared 5% of the time
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs HPE Zerto Software Logo
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs HPE Zerto Software
Compared 4% of the time
Commvault Cloud vs HPE Zerto Software Logo
Commvault Cloud vs HPE Zerto Software
Compared 4% of the time
More HPE Zerto Software Competitors
Precisely Assure MIMIX vs Vision Solutions Double-Take Logo
Precisely Assure MIMIX vs Vision Solutions Double-Take
Compared 10% of the time
Dell RecoverPoint vs Vision Solutions Double-Take Logo
Dell RecoverPoint vs Vision Solutions Double-Take
Compared 9% of the time
Veeam Data Platform vs Vision Solutions Double-Take Logo
Veeam Data Platform vs Vision Solutions Double-Take
Compared 7% of the time
Uplynk vs Vision Solutions Double-Take Logo
Uplynk vs Vision Solutions Double-Take
Compared 7% of the time
Precisely Assure QuickEDD vs Vision Solutions Double-Take Logo
Precisely Assure QuickEDD vs Vision Solutions Double-Take
Compared 7% of the time
More Vision Solutions Double-Take Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
HPE Zerto Software
March 2026
HPE Zerto Software reportDownload HPE Zerto Software product report
Buyer's Guide
Data Replication
February 2026
Vision Solutions Double-Take reportDownload Vision Solutions Double-Take product report
 

Also Known As

Zerto Virtual Replication
Double-Take, DoubleTake
 

Overview

Zerto is used for disaster recovery, business continuity, data migration, and ransomware recovery, providing continuous data protection and near real-time replication. Valued for ease of use, efficient failover processes, and versatile integration, it enhances organizational efficiency, reduces errors, and boosts productivity.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Continuous data protection, high-availability and disaster recovery software and services.

IBM
 

Sample Customers

United Airlines, HCA, XPO Logistics, TaxSlayer, McKesson, Insight Global, American Airlines, Tencate, Aaron’s, Grey’s County, Kingston Technologies
ABC Fine Wine & Spirits, Accessor Capital Management, Adventist Health, Alfa Bank, Alphawest Services, Ameristar Casinos, Ambrian Capital PLC
Buyer's Guide
HPE Zerto Software vs. Vision Solutions Double-Take
March 2026
Free Report: HPE Zerto Software vs. Vision Solutions Double-Take
Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Zerto Software vs. Vision Solutions Double-Take and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our HPE Zerto Software vs. Vision Solutions Double-Take report.
See our list of best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.

We monitor all Disaster Recovery (DR) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.