HPE Zerto Software vs Vision Solutions Double-Take comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and IBM are both solutions in the Disaster Recovery (DR) Software category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #1 with an average rating of 9.0, while IBM is ranked #33. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 5.7% mindshare in DRS, compared to IBM’s 1.7% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of IBM users who would recommend it.

HPE Zerto Software

Read 359 HPE Zerto Software reviews

24,233 Views
11,390 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Vision Solutions Double-Take

Read 4 Vision Solutions Double-Take reviews

2,167 Views
1,149 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

HPE Zerto Software

Vision Solutions Double-Take

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 22, 2026

Vision Solutions Double-Take and HPE Zerto Software are competing in the data protection and disaster recovery market. HPE Zerto Software appears to have the upper hand with its advanced features, although Vision Solutions Double-Take is more competitively priced.

Features: Vision Solutions Double-Take offers real-time byte-level replication, full server migration, and SQL migrations. HPE Zerto Software provides analytical and reporting monitoring, ransomware protection, and orchestration for automated failover.

Room for Improvement: Vision Solutions Double-Take could improve by enhancing its analytical capabilities, offering more robust ransomware protection, and expanding its orchestration features. HPE Zerto Software may benefit from simplifying deployment, better supporting Hyper-V environments, and broadening its analytical feature set to compete with external analytics tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Vision Solutions Double-Take is straightforward to deploy with comprehensive support, making it appealing for easy implementation needs. HPE Zerto Software, despite its complexity, provides thorough documentation and support which is ideal for detailed setup guidance.

Pricing and ROI: Vision Solutions Double-Take offers a cost-effective setup with quicker ROI, suited for organizations with tight budgets. In contrast, HPE Zerto Software, although requiring a higher initial investment, provides potential long-term value through its robust feature set, making it attractive for enterprises focusing on comprehensive disaster recovery needs.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE Zerto Software vs. Vision Solutions Double-Take Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

HPE Zerto Software vs. Vision Solutions Double-Take

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,834 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE Zerto Software

Ranking in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

1st

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

359

Ranking in other categories

Backup and Recovery (2nd), Cloud Migration (1st), Cloud Backup (2nd), Autonomous Operational Resilience (1st)

Vision Solutions Double-Take

Ranking in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

33rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Replication (12th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Disaster Recovery (DR) Software category, the mindshare of HPE Zerto Software is 5.7%, down from 10.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Vision Solutions Double-Take is 1.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
HPE Zerto Software	5.7%
Vision Solutions Double-Take	1.7%
Other	92.6%

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

Featured Reviews

reviewer2802231

Dev Ops Engineer at a media company with 201-500 employees

Near-zero downtime has protected critical workloads and now simplifies hybrid cloud recovery

The best features of HPE Zerto Software are mainly very sophisticated and relevant to the current market. The data protection CDP part has real-time replication, unlike other solutions that have snapshot backups. We can set it up hourly, making it ideal for use with workloads. Another attraction is the near-zero RTO, with automated failover within minutes and one-click failover and failback. Currently, we are using a hybrid cloud solution, and HPE Zerto Software supports multi-cloud environments, making it easy to migrate between on-premises and cloud. Regarding the impact of HPE Zerto Software on our RTOs, we have near-zero RTO, meaning the system must be back online within thirty minutes if we measure the time. It is very quick to recover services. With HPE Zerto Software's near-synchronous replication, we have some CDP protection, so we typically write interceptions along with some asynchronous replication. There is almost real-time replication available.

Read full review

it_user710520

Migration Specialist at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

It gives us the possibility to migrate/protect customer servers and data in the simplest way

Full server migration possibility and SQL migrations It gives us the possibility to migrate/protect customer servers and data in the simplest way. Linux compatibility SQL migrations GUI For over a year. Not such a good coverage of the most widely used Linux server distributions, so many…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"HPE Zerto Software's recovery speed to other disaster recovery solutions shows that it's superior."

"The failover feature is great for getting VMs up and running at a secondary site."

"The feature I appreciate the most in HPE Zerto Software is the move or the failover buttons."

"The ability to perform DR testing to ensure data integrity is critical."

"Zerto simply is the tool for protecting any virtual workload."

"I love Zerto's near-synchronous replication. I've been using Zerto for three years at my current employer and many years before that. It's been great. Anywhere I've used it, it's made the failover process a lot easier so that pretty much anybody can do it. This feature is our number one priority because we can keep our critical apps running if we have a failure, or even if we have a misconfiguration, it's very easy to recover something quickly."

"It's extremely easy to use with one of the shortest setups I've ever done."

"I am quite familiar with the user interface. It is easy for me to operate and perform different operations because I am an experienced user. In my opinion, the user interface is easy to understand and operate. The user interface is user-friendly."

More HPE Zerto Software pros

"In Version 7.xx the most valuable feature to me is being able to carry out a test full server failover in which case the primary server is still up and running."

"It gives us the possibility to migrate/protect customer servers and data in the simplest way."

"It takes less time to replicate files between two servers."

"Customer Service: Second to none Technical Support: Second to none"

Cons

"HPE Zerto Software didn't help to reduce my organization's DR testing; I was shocked by it since whenever I actually performed the DR test, it took my environments down."

"The main issue with Zerto is its user interface, which lacks flexibility and presents a steep learning curve."

"There is room for improvement in the upgrades."

"The time between releases is too long. Zerto doesn't seem to really keep up with the products with which they need to be compatible. For instance, the 9.5 updates 3 took about 90 days to come out after the latest version of vCenter 7.0 update 3 was released."

"If they already do not have it, they can have some APIs for the Horizon environment. Instead of having to use some scripts to get around, they can make it a lot more user-friendly for integration."

"The primary concern expressed by all server users is the lack of robust integration features."

"Its pricing could be better. Also, Zerto needs to improve its reporting capabilities and provide better dashboards."

"I have not seen any return on investment from HPE Zerto Software yet."

More HPE Zerto Software cons

"Not such a good coverage of the most widely used Linux server distributions, so many issues happen while migrating these servers."

"Yes I encountered issues with deployment. The information provided in the guide just stated about 2 or 3 communication ports but even after these ports are enabled there are still issues with the 2 servers communicating via Double-Take."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's expensive, for sure, but for us, it comes down to the fact that we do not replicate our entire environment using Zerto. We replicate the mission-critical servers and services, so the yearly cost of Zerto is heavily outweighed by the potential cost of an outage."

"We have seen ROI. Several times, we needed to recover, and we were able to go to Zerto."

"Pricing depends on your future growth. Start small and then scale up."

"Nothing is cheap, but Zerto represents decent value."

"Currently, it is good, but the license we are using is based on VM count. We are only protecting mission-critical servers, so we are using a very low number, about 300. However, we have 3,000 or more servers. If we consider using Zerto for data protection, it would cost us more than what we have for data protection now."

"The pricing seems fair."

"The pricing is slightly above average, but the immediate and comprehensive support makes the price acceptable."

"All of my customers are happy with how this product works and they like it, but unfortunately, in the market that I represent, Zerto is expensive when compared with the competition."

More HPE Zerto Software pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user159711

Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Nov 9, 2014

VMware SRM vs. Veeam vs. Zerto

Disaster recovery planning is something that seems challenging for all businesses. Virtualization in addition to its operational flexibility, and cost reduction benefits, has helped companies improve their DR posture. Virtualization has made it easier to move machines from production to…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	94
Midsize Enterprise	93
Large Enterprise	206

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What advice do you have for others considering Oracle Data Guard?

Ik fluister:VM Host Oracle en DataGuard hebben we per toeval vervangen door Zerto :-) tijdens de Zerto implementatie en VPG werden de Host Data in write-ack Block-Level gerepliceerd. Qua licentie 1...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zerto?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is good.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zerto?

HPE Zerto Software's GUI needs modernization to match the flexibility and user experience of other HPE software solutions, as there is still room for improvement in software-level flexibility and t...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Veeam Data Platform vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 9% of the time

Rubrik vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 4% of the time

VMware Live Recovery vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 4% of the time

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 3% of the time

N-able Cove Data Protection vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 2% of the time

More HPE Zerto Software Competitors

Dell RecoverPoint vs Vision Solutions Double-Take

Compared 8% of the time

Uplynk vs Vision Solutions Double-Take

Compared 6% of the time

NetApp SnapMirror vs Vision Solutions Double-Take

Compared 6% of the time

IBM Softek TDMF vs Vision Solutions Double-Take

Compared 6% of the time

Precisely Assure MIMIX vs Vision Solutions Double-Take

Compared 6% of the time

More Vision Solutions Double-Take Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HPE Zerto Software

August 2026

Download HPE Zerto Software product report

Buyer's Guide

Data Replication

July 2026

Download Vision Solutions Double-Take product report

Also Known As

Zerto Virtual Replication

Double-Take, DoubleTake

Overview

Zerto is used for disaster recovery, business continuity, data migration, and ransomware recovery, providing continuous data protection and near real-time replication. Valued for ease of use, efficient failover processes, and versatile integration, it enhances organizational efficiency, reduces errors, and boosts productivity.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Vision Solutions Double-Take provides robust data protection and migration services tailored for complex IT environments, ensuring seamless business continuity across platforms. This solution is ideal for businesses requiring high availability and disaster recovery.

Vision Solutions Double-Take offers a reliable framework for managing data replication, providing enterprises with functionality that maintains data integrity and minimizes downtime. Designed to support critical workloads, it facilitates smooth data transitioning and enhanced operability through virtual and physical server replication. Organizations benefit from the scalable architecture, allowing adjustments to meet evolving IT requirements confidently.

What are the valuable features of Vision Solutions Double-Take?

Real-Time Replication: Ensures constantly updated data by mirroring changes instantly.
Virtualization Support: Compatible with physical, virtual, and cloud infrastructures for flexible deployment.
Automated Failover: Seamlessly redirects resources to backup systems during failures.
Data Compression: Reduces bandwidth usage by efficiently compressing replicated data.

What benefits or ROI should users expect?

Reduced Downtime: Minimizing disruptions ensures continuous business operations.
Cost Efficiency: Decreases storage expenses by utilizing existing infrastructure efficiently.
Scalability: Easily adapts to the growing demands of IT environments.

In healthcare, Vision Solutions Double-Take supports critical data availability, while in finance, it ensures compliance and protection of sensitive information. Retail sectors benefit from minimal interruption in service, facilitating uninterrupted point-of-sale transactions.

IBM

Sample Customers

United Airlines, HCA, XPO Logistics, TaxSlayer, McKesson, Insight Global, American Airlines, Tencate, Aaron’s, Grey’s County, Kingston Technologies

ABC Fine Wine & Spirits, Accessor Capital Management, Adventist Health, Alfa Bank, Alphawest Services, Ameristar Casinos, Ambrian Capital PLC

Buyer's Guide

HPE Zerto Software vs. Vision Solutions Double-Take

August 2026

Free Report: HPE Zerto Software vs. Vision Solutions Double-Take

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Zerto Software vs. Vision Solutions Double-Take and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HPE Zerto Software vs. Vision Solutions Double-Take report.

See our list of best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.

We monitor all Disaster Recovery (DR) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.