HPE OneView vs Nagios Fusion comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Nagios are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #22 with an average rating of 8.7, while Nagios is ranked #72. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 1.1% mindshare in IM, compared to Nagios’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Nagios users who would recommend it.

HPE OneView

Read 84 HPE OneView reviews

5,386 Views
4,955 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Nagios Fusion

Read 4 Nagios Fusion reviews

1,273 Views
1,260 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

HPE OneView

Nagios Fusion

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

HPE OneView and Nagios Fusion are competing in IT infrastructure management. Nagios Fusion seems to have the upper hand due to its extensive features that outweigh potentially higher costs.

Features: HPE OneView provides centralized management, automates data center operations, and integrates with Hewlett Packard Enterprise products. It emphasizes hardware lifecycle management. Nagios Fusion monitors large distributed networks, offers comprehensive data insights, and focuses on network and application monitoring.

Room for Improvement: HPE OneView could improve network monitoring capabilities, offer more integrations with non-HPE products, and enhance its user interface for better user experience. Nagios Fusion might need to advance its deployment configurations, improve its hardware management capabilities, and enhance its scalability for very large environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HPE OneView is straightforward to deploy with intuitive management and structured customer support. Nagios Fusion offers flexible deployment options accommodating diverse IT environments but may require more configuration effort. Its customer service can vary due to different service offerings.

Pricing and ROI: HPE OneView generally comes with a higher initial setup cost but reduces manual tasks, leading to robust ROI. Nagios Fusion is initially cost-effective, especially in open-source environments, with ROI achieved through its monitoring capabilities that prevent downtime.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE OneView vs. Nagios Fusion Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

HPE OneView vs. Nagios Fusion

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,948 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE OneView

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

22nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Nagios Fusion

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

72nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of HPE OneView is 1.1%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nagios Fusion is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
HPE OneView	1.1%
Nagios Fusion	0.5%
Other	98.4%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Kapil Pandey

Technology Management Consultant at National Institute for Smart Government - NISG

Gaining seamless monitoring and customization capabilities

One of the best features of HPE OneView is that you get a complete architecture with a single click. The analytics and monitoring tools in HPE OneView are superior to other network monitoring platforms such as Nagios. The features include multiple modules that allow you to create and write your own scripts based on your requirements for different servers such as database servers or tapping roaming servers. There is more feasibility when using HP Service Manager because, unlike other tools with predefined standards for script writing, we have the option for customization as per our choice, and dashboard reports can be customized.

Read full review

SyarulIdzuddin Adzmi

Operation Director at Digital Pulse Sdn Bhd

A suitable choice for unified and efficient infrastructure monitoring across diverse environments providing user-friendly GUI, cost-effectiveness, and versatility

We use it for this specific client, they've deployed multiple instances of it across various locations to facilitate monitoring. To effectively monitor their infrastructure, it seems necessary to implement additional monitoring solutions for all three types of devices they have Nagios Fusion…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"OneView allowed us to accelerate the base configuration far faster and more accurately than ever before with manual configuration procedures."

"It has improved the working of our organization by providing more consistency within our firmware, drivers, firmware baseline and server profiling; thus it provides more consistency."

"The single-pane-of-glass and a full view of the environment are the most valuable features."

"Everything we ask for is there."

"The hardware's reliability and manageability are important criteria while selecting a vendor."

"I like the ability that we can manage multiple enclosures within OneView; it's like one stop shopping where you can manage all the server profiles and do everything from a blade enclosure standpoint using OneView."

"Universality of product Broad range of integration points for third-party software Broad range of tools to create executive and operations dashboards."

"I don't have to use CD-ROMs or anything like that to provision the servers."

More HPE OneView pros

"Nagios Fusion version 12.8 excels in user-friendly GUI design, cost-effectiveness, and ease of deployment."

"It's very easy to manage and monitor it."

"It is easier for client installation, and the configurations are doable even for a newcomer in the field."

"Being open source lets us customize it for our monitoring needs, saving us money."

Cons

"The network configuration part of HPE OneView needs improvement. The solution has way too many features, and there's a need for proper configuration indicators to be put in place."

"I have to chop it up into smaller parts, because I have an installation in Europe and it covers the whole world. That is not so good. They need to be more localized, so I am going to chop it up into smaller bits."

"It's a little slow sometimes. Overall, I think it does what it's supposed to do. I think that as they evolve it, it'll get quicker."

"The older platform requires iLO licenses but does not require the purchase of servers. This platform has problems because it is dependent on old class enclosures and hardware that cannot link or be managed with the solution."

"I saw, maybe three years ago or two years ago here, or in Barcelona, at the HPE Discover conference, a feature that you can update Clusterware with VMware. But the feature is still not live in production. Currently, you have to do all the firmware updates and then you have to do the VMware updates. So you have two reboots and it would be better if it was just one."

"The solution's console can be improved by making it more user-friendly and adding the capability to filter the reports out using only the information required."

"HPE OneView should be able to cover more device models apart from ProLiant and Synergy."

"As much as we've used OneView right now, it's probably not something that we're going to move forward with as a bigger footprint."

More HPE OneView cons

"Adding application performance monitoring to the product alongside infrastructure monitoring would make it a more complete and useful solution."

"In future iterations of this solution, there is a desire for more seamless integration with other monitoring software."

"There are some bugs, although not that many. There are some situations where the solution is not stable but the number of problems is not very high."

"Nagios Fusion should include a 'remember me' option when logging in, so we don't need to enter a username and password every time."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I feel the product's price falls a bit on the higher side."

"The solution is free to use, but if you want the management aspect you require a virtual machine such as C7000 or Synergy which require licenses."

"When it comes to the government, money is never an issue, so it was excellent in terms of the HPE OneView licensing cost. Hitachi was cheaper, but I'd rate HPE OneView cost-wise as eight out of ten."

"I am happy with the price."

"HPE had some other solutions, but they were actually quite expensive to buy. So, when OneView came along, it was kind of reasonable in terms of price for licenses, etc."

"HPE could lower the price."

"I think that the price of OneView is $500 USD per server, which is a little high."

"Synergy does not require iLO licenses but servers and enclosures must be purchased."

More HPE OneView pricing and cost advice

"The pricing is quite reasonable, especially when compared to the broader market."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,948 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

10%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

12%

Construction Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	22
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	51

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with HPE OneView?

From the dashboard and reporting perspective, HPE OneView could be improved by having multiple modules rather than just a single customization option.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HPE OneView?

The typical use case for HPE OneView addresses a shift from manual monitoring, where clients needed to log in to the server every hour. After integrating everything on HP Service Manager and HP Ope...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering HPE OneView?

Regarding the integration capabilities of HPE OneView with platforms such as VMware, SAP, or other platforms, I work for Telecom VAS servers, for SMSC, CMC, and CRB. We already have an HP team in p...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

NetApp Data Infrastructure Insights vs HPE OneView

Compared 12% of the time

Cisco Intersight vs HPE OneView

Compared 8% of the time

Cisco UCS Manager vs HPE OneView

Compared 6% of the time

Dell CloudIQ vs HPE OneView

Compared 5% of the time

Zabbix vs HPE OneView

Compared 5% of the time

More HPE OneView Competitors

Zenoss Cloud vs Nagios Fusion

Compared 23% of the time

Nagios XI vs Nagios Fusion

Compared 20% of the time

Icinga vs Nagios Fusion

Compared 10% of the time

vRealize Network Insight vs Nagios Fusion

Compared 8% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs Nagios Fusion

Compared 7% of the time

More Nagios Fusion Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HPE OneView

August 2026

Download HPE OneView product report

Buyer's Guide

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

July 2026

Download Nagios Fusion product report

Also Known As

HP OneView

No data available

Overview

HPE OneView offers a centralized platform for managing IT infrastructure with ease, emphasizing automation and reducing errors. Its integrated approach provides users unified control over storage, compute, and network management.

HPE OneView delivers comprehensive infrastructure visibility and effective monitoring through a user-friendly interface. Automation, real-time alerts, and quick server deployment enhance operational efficiency. Seamless integration and profile templates further streamline workflows. Despite its strengths, some users seek improved navigation, faster response times, and extended platform support. Enhanced reporting and support for older hardware models are desirable.

What key features make HPE OneView valuable?

Single Pane of Glass: Centralized management across IT infrastructure.
Automation: Streamlines processes and reduces deployment times.
Real-Time Alerts: Provides timely notifications for proactive management.
User-Friendly Interface: Enhances ease of use and reduces training time.
Profile Templates: Simplifies configuration for consistent deployments.
Unified Console: Supports storage, compute, and network management seamlessly.

What ROI should users consider when evaluating HPE OneView?

Efficiency Gains: Automation reduces manual effort and errors.
Improved Monitoring: Centralized alerts ensure quick issue resolution.
Deployment Speed: Faster setup times for IT resources.
Integration Benefits: Seamless connections with virtualization platforms enhance workflows.
Cost Reduction: Streamlined operations lower operational expenses.

Companies leverage HPE OneView across sectors such as finance, telecom, and government, utilizing its capabilities for unified monitoring, management, and configuration. It's implemented on-premises and as a hybrid cloud management interface, supporting environments like Synergy and VMware. By integrating with virtualization platforms, it advances hardware, firmware, and network management efficiency, significantly reducing manual processes.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Nagios Fusion provides centralized monitoring, delivering real-time status updates and comprehensive visualizations, ideal for comprehensive IT environments.

Designed to aggregate data from multiple Nagios instances, Nagios Fusion simplifies monitoring by offering a unified view. It enhances IT operations management through quick access to crucial metrics and alerts. Organizations can efficiently monitor network performance, ensuring errors are promptly identified and rectified. Its integration with Nagios Core and XI streamlines information management, offering comprehensive visibility.

What are the valuable features of Nagios Fusion?

Centralized Monitoring: Integrates multiple Nagios instances for a single-pane-of-glass overview.
Real-Time Status Updates: Provides immediate insights on network and server status.
Customizable Dashboards: Tailors monitoring views to meet specific requirements.

What benefits do users look for in Nagios Fusion reviews?

Enhanced Monitoring Capabilities: Improved visibility and control over IT systems.
Scalability: Adapts to growing infrastructure needs without compromising performance.
Time Savings: Reduces the time spent on manual monitoring processes.

Nagios Fusion is used across industries like healthcare, finance, and manufacturing to ensure seamless operations. In finance, it monitors transaction processes, offering reliable system checks, while in healthcare, it supports critical system uptime, contributing to uninterrupted patient care.

Nagios

Sample Customers

Asante, ITS Nordics, Columbus Communications, Mansfield Oil

NuBlue, St.Elisabeth Hospital, Akamit Systems, National Radio Astronomy Observatory, ValueClick, Sunrise Banks

Buyer's Guide

HPE OneView vs. Nagios Fusion

August 2026

Free Report: HPE OneView vs. Nagios Fusion

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE OneView vs. Nagios Fusion and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,948 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HPE OneView vs. Nagios Fusion report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.