"The initial setup was straightforward."
"The speed is very good."
"The technical support is very good."
"This is a very robust product and it offers everything that we are looking for."
"HPE 3PAR StoreServ has a good interface, it is user-friendly and easy to use."
"The intelligence around the solution is good."
"We're hosting virtual infrastructure on the 3PAR storage and it's been very good for that."
"We choose 3PAR for its speed. It's so fast and reliable."
"It is very well known in the industry, and there are a lot of technical resources around it. This is a big thing for me because, at the end of the day, when you implement it, you need to support it."
"The solution is quite stable."
"The most valuable feature is the fast performance."
"The solution fits well with my requirements."
"It easily integrates with all types of storage."
"It uncoupled the idea of proprietary technology and component capabilities. It is basically a proprietary technology for a cost-effective infrastructure."
"Overall the solution is very good."
"The flexibility is most valuable. Being able to manage things quickly if something goes wrong is also valuable. Very recently, we had one node that went down due to a power problem, but there was really no major impact on the systems running on top of it."
"The price is a little bit high."
"From an overall perspective, all the latest technologies can improve support and performance. This is very important for us."
"The price of this solution should be lower."
"Scalability and management could be improved."
"There is a slight difference between what we expected and what was delivered."
"HPE 3PAR StoreServ could have better integration into the cloud and converged infrastructure."
"If HPE 3PAR could handle NAS and all things related to NAS, you would not need to have a mixture of different storages, storage boxes, one solution could fit all."
"The solution lacks reliability."
"We often run out of space but we have enough capacity for memory and CPU. It's difficult to find the balance between storage and memory CPU."
"Lacks an integrated backup solution."
"It would be ideal if the solution offered some intelligent monitoring."
"Upgradability could be a bit easier sometimes. We are now where vSAN can be updated without ESXi, but there is still enough dependency. So that would be good if that actually would uncoupled even more."
"The solution could be improved by having more filtered and multiple view volumes instead of a single view."
"The ability to access SAN environments with fiber channels (or even NVMe) would be a good addition."
"It could be cheaper."
"There could be more features with the automatic backup."
HPE 3PAR StoreServ is ranked 6th in All-Flash Storage Arrays with 41 reviews while VMware vSAN is ranked 2nd in Hyper-Converged (HCI) with 87 reviews. HPE 3PAR StoreServ is rated 8.4, while VMware vSAN is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of HPE 3PAR StoreServ writes "Robust and easy to use with a simple setup ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware vSAN writes "Gives us a lot of advantages when we need to expand resources". HPE 3PAR StoreServ is most compared with HPE Primera, Dell Unity XT, HPE Nimble Storage, NetApp AFF (All Flash FAS) and Dell PowerStore, whereas VMware vSAN is most compared with VxRail, Nutanix Acropolis AOS, Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct, HPE SimpliVity and Red Hat Ceph Storage.
We monitor all All-Flash Storage Arrays reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
