We performed a comparison between Hillstone S-Series Network Intrusion Prevention System and Sophos UTM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Darktrace, Vectra AI, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)."Setup is straightforward with the same reliability and scalability as the firewall series."
More Hillstone S-Series Network Intrusion Prevention System Pros →
"The most valuable features of Sophos UTM are the ease of use, it is very user-friendly. You can understand what they implement in the new firmware, and it's easy to manage the firewalls."
"The intrusion prevention is great, and I like dual virus scanning on the network layer because we scan it through Avira and Sophos. Web filtering is also a fantastic option for clients who want to really lock down internet access."
"It meets our compliance needs in an elastic computer environment."
"The UTM features are reasonably strong and the patterns are updated on a regular basis"
"Sophos SG UTM had all the basic functionality that you needed. It is user-friendly and easy to manage for any integrator."
"The firewall itself is very strong and provides great security."
"The solution is stable."
"An easy solution to learn because the graphics are very intuitive."
"Lack of tools to help educate end users"
More Hillstone S-Series Network Intrusion Prevention System Cons →
"I would like some features that are available in other brands. For example, I sometimes a person is using too much bandwidth, and it isn't easy to find this information in Sophos. Also, we have to switch connections manually when we are using a VPN and lose the MPLS connection. It isn't automatic."
"We need a better VPN client for the customers."
"There were a lot of features and functionality in Sophos SG UTM but nothing was state of the art in terms of technology. You did not get the latest functions. It was very monolithic as it was based on an old Linux PuTTY system."
"They could use more SSL VPN support."
"We had some problems with the configuration. They had provided a CloudFormation template, and we had to go several rounds to make it work."
"During initial configuration, I encountered a few issues."
"We'd like to see them offer their services on mobile devices like tablets. I'm not sure if that's an option or not."
"Support for IKEv2 is needed in this solution."
Earn 20 points
Hillstone S-Series Network Intrusion Prevention System is ranked 28th in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) while Sophos UTM is ranked 1st in Unified Threat Management (UTM) with 110 reviews. Hillstone S-Series Network Intrusion Prevention System is rated 9.0, while Sophos UTM is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Hillstone S-Series Network Intrusion Prevention System writes "Complements any firewall". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sophos UTM writes "It's a highly stable platform with very few hardware issues". Hillstone S-Series Network Intrusion Prevention System is most compared with Darktrace, whereas Sophos UTM is most compared with Netgate pfSense, Fortinet FortiGate, Sophos XG, OPNsense and Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls.
We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.