No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Hevo vs SAP Replication Server comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Hevo
Ranking in Data Integration
47th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
4.4
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SAP Replication Server
Ranking in Data Integration
56th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
Database Development and Management (21st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of Hevo is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Replication Server is 1.0%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Integration Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Hevo0.5%
SAP Replication Server1.0%
Other98.5%
Data Integration
 

Featured Reviews

JF
Senior Database Administrator at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
Data pipelines have saved time and improve accuracy for daily operations and projects
I believe Hevo can be improved by preparing some guidelines or a manual that any database engineer or related professional can utilize for day-to-day activity. If the support is connected or easily accessible, that could be an improvement. In addition to the points I mentioned, I think AI compatibility is crucial, as everything is becoming more advanced these days, so if that feature has been advanced or upgraded, it would be beneficial. I find the accuracy of Hevo's output to be better, though it can still be improved. I don't have any other improvements needed for Hevo beyond the documentation, support access, and advanced AI capabilities I've mentioned.
GagandeepSingh3 - PeerSpot reviewer
Principal Engineer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Good at handling replication, provides cross-database replication but SAP can provide better support for cross-database replication to newer technologies
SAP can provide better support for cross-database replication to newer technologies. The product supports Oracle, but I am not aware of what other technologies it supports. If someone wants to replicate their data from Sybase to a newer technology for data warehousing or other purposes, it would be better if they supported those.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"My advice for anyone in database roles, such as administrators, data engineers, or analysts, is to start using Hevo to save time."
"Hevo positively impacted my organization by allowing us to move data quickly and easily, enabling us to focus on our real challenge: performing analytics and reporting out of Snowflake with all customer data centralized despite using various applications."
"Hevo has positively impacted my organization by ensuring excellent usage of collected data, which is utilized in various workflows, including sales and marketing and customer relationship management, ultimately helping me serve clients better."
"It speeds up the performance in terms of how fast you are able to access the data, look at it, get it reported to you, and send it to somebody. It also reduces the amount of storage."
"It's pretty good at handling replication, even under high load. It also provides cross-database replication, for example, from Sybase to Oracle."
"We can customize any workflow and we also like the business domain modeling that can be done."
"SAP is renovating different things. We are using external tools to connect as of now. It is going well, and now the new generation integration platforms are going to be pretty easy."
"The most valuable thing about this product is that it replicates data between SAP databases (ASE to IQ) very successfully."
"SAP Replication Server is an application that I consider to be a robust system. It has proven to be highly reliable in my experience."
"We use this solution for all kinds of communications like RFC, BAPI, IDoc, connecting with the orders, accounts, finance, data stuff, banking, everything."
"This product has a catalog with the location of all the objects which were replicated, and it's very simple to maintain."
 

Cons

"Hevo could be improved as we hit limits, particularly when it couldn't keep up with the high number of databases we wanted to sync frequently—ideally updating everything hourly for near real-time analytics rather than a day behind."
"I find the accuracy of Hevo's output to be better, though it can still be improved."
"There are areas where Hevo could improve, particularly regarding its cost structure, as the pricing is based on usage and the advanced features can become costly for startups that are not well-established."
"Setup was a little complex."
"It's a very expensive solution."
"It's complex. It's necessary to understand a little about infrastructure, like network LAN and VLAN environment."
"There is room for improvement in terms of pricing and faster support."
"The private solution is expensive. If you're in a situation where you're paying IBM or AWS or somebody just to host you specifically, you're paying people to run it and you're taking care of all the upgrades."
"There is a need to improve performance in high transactional processes."
"I would like to see it become mobile-friendly."
"Improvement is a never ending story, and HANA is doing some improvements. We are able to adopt that, and we have to do it by integration with HANA. They are very major changes that we need to see."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"It's a very expensive solution."
"You can pick one of the hosted cloud services as opposed to owning it and doing it yourself. Your cost of ownership on the hardware, the data storage, and the maintenance all go down. It depends on what service you use."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Comms Service Provider
15%
Construction Company
11%
Security Firm
11%
Retailer
9%
Construction Company
21%
Comms Service Provider
14%
Outsourcing Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise5
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Hevo?
There are areas where Hevo could improve, particularly regarding its cost structure, as the pricing is based on usage and the advanced features can become costly for startups that are not well-esta...
What is your primary use case for Hevo?
Hevo is mainly used for data integration purposes, and I use it to form a pipeline or a gateway where data is collected from various data collection platforms or sources. Hevo is a data integration...
What advice do you have for others considering Hevo?
I would rate this product highly based on my experience with it.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

No data available
Sybase Replication Server
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Deliverr, Meesho, Byju's, Envato, NZXT, Kazoo, Webedia, Airwallex, Cuvva, Opploans
Medtronic, Cirque du Soleil, Antarc, B&G Manufacturing, EarlySense, eBay, Ferrero, James Austin Company, Lenovo, Sagem, RAK Ceramics, Vodafone
Find out what your peers are saying about Hevo vs. SAP Replication Server and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.