Heroku vs Virtuozzo Application Platform comparison

Heroku and Virtuozzo are both solutions in the PaaS Clouds category. Heroku is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.0, while Virtuozzo is ranked #22. Heroku holds a 3.4% mindshare in PSP, compared to Virtuozzo’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Heroku users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Virtuozzo users who would recommend it.

Heroku

Read 29 Heroku reviews

2,066 Views
609 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Virtuozzo Application Platform

Read 7 Virtuozzo Application Platform reviews

468 Views
104 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Heroku

Virtuozzo Application Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Heroku and Virtuozzo Application Platform are leading platforms as a service (PaaS) solutions. Heroku is often preferred for its ease of use and broad ecosystem, making it ideal for quick and straightforward deployments, while Virtuozzo offers more customization and control, suited for enterprise-level projects.

Features: Heroku supports numerous programming languages and provides a wealth of third-party add-ons and a simple version control system, making it perfect for developers. Virtuozzo Application Platform offers advanced resource management, load balancing, and auto-scaling capabilities, allowing for more robust application environments.

Room for Improvement: Heroku could improve its support channels for lower-tier customers and increase customization options for users demanding more control. Virtuozzo Application Platform might enhance its user friendliness with a simplified setup process and provide more straightforward documentation to aid less technical users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Heroku offers one-click deployment with extensive documentation, making it suitable for quick project launches. Customer service is responsive but prioritizes higher-tier subscriptions. Virtuozzo Application Platform requires a more involved setup process due to its comprehensive configuration potential, yet offers robust support with various channels.

Pricing and ROI: Heroku's pricing is resource-based with no upfront costs, proving economical for small to medium applications. Virtuozzo has a higher initial cost but provides substantial returns for complex, large-scale projects due to efficient resource management.

To learn more, read our detailed Heroku vs. Virtuozzo Application Platform Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Heroku vs. Virtuozzo Application Platform

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,687 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Heroku

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

14th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Virtuozzo Application Platform

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

22nd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the PaaS Clouds category, the mindshare of Heroku is 3.4%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Virtuozzo Application Platform is 0.7%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

PaaS Clouds

Featured Reviews

Cristian-Molina

Senior Developer at Go Coeupas

Has a quick development cycle and continuous integration

The initial setup is straightforward. Heroku integrates well. You only have to push the code, and it automatically deploys the new version. Whether you have permission depends on the application. Currently, I have one application that I deploy myself. I rate the initial setup a nine out of ten, where one is difficult and ten is easy.

Read full review

Miguel Maloney Thompson

IC Director at a printing company with 11-50 employees

A scalable and stable solution that has good scalability and is easy to setup

It is a scalable solution. I have yet to have a scenario regarding automatic scale and if there's an increase in resource requirement or need. We have yet to have that scenario. We have yet to test that. The scalability was more than manually adjusting and increasing whatever I had to do. I rate it eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is easy to deploy applications, and we don't need to bother about software updates on the server. We don't need to bother about machines, servers, and hardware. We only need to care about the system and functionality that we need or want to develop. They take care of everything else. It provides high availability. It is a pretty good solution that provides everything that we need. It has everything that we need to run our applications. We have many different applications, and we generate three million bills for a company in Brazil. We see more than a billion requests per day in another application. Everything works just fine, and it is very good."

"I like the tool's scalability, CLI, and dashboards."

"Valuable for us was the fast deployment. This means the time to market is improved without pain for developers."

"We use Heroku to run generic data. We also use it for our customer development environment. It helps us to build and test websites."

"The product is stable."

"The solution's most valuable feature is the auto maintenance of databases."

"The most valuable feature of Heroku is the continuous integration and applications it provides."

"Thanks to Heroku, we don't need to do as much direct management in AWS."

More Heroku pros

"Technical support from Jelastic is very good."

"The advanced level of production-ready Docker hosting, one-click application deployment, and the truly flexible pricing."

"The dynamic vertical scaling is a unique feature."

"The control is valuable. It's really easy to use and you have good control of your solutions."

"The solution is scalable, and that is what we are looking at. There is no learning curve as we have not done much research."

Cons

"We don't find the pipelines intuitive. The user experience could be better. Having to set up multiple apps, then a pipeline, seems like an overkill on the amount of work to do."

"Heroku had an authentication problem a few months ago, but they solved it."

"We have to do daily restarts of some processes, which is annoying, and the support for custom CI could be better."

"We would like to be notified when something goes wrong in the process. When something is not working, we should get an alert."

"I think this solution would be improved if free demos were available indefinitely."

"I improved the application performance by monitoring and adjusting the cleaner configuration to help set better lightweight limits on containers that run the app instances."

"Their support is good, but they can improve their response time."

"They could flesh out some of their analytics a little more."

More Heroku cons

"Lacks better integration into enterprise storage products."

"The backup features need improvement, or rather it should be added, as I could not find it."

"For now, some customers are requesting support of Docker containers for Windows."

"The security layers also need to be improved because there is no clear layer or tier of security in the solution."

"The backup functionality needs to be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its price is very good."

"The price of Heroku could be less expensive."

"The tool is free."

"I rate the tool's pricing a three out of ten."

"There is a standard fee for a processing unit, they call them "dynos," and then you pay for add-ons."

"I would rate the cost 3 out of 5. There are additional costs other than licensing fees."

"Pricing for providers is revenue-shared based. Providers should invest in hardware to set up the Jelastic cluster."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,687 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

12%

Educational Organization

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

16%

Performing Arts

Comms Service Provider

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Heroku?

I like the tool's scalability, CLI, and dashboards.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Heroku?

I don't like that the web server crashes every day, every 24 hours. The pricing could be improved because scaling the database becomes costly. The Docker features are not great. You cannot use any ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Heroku?

We use the solution for web applications and web APIs.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure vs Heroku

Compared 24% of the time

Pivotal Cloud Foundry vs Heroku

Compared 13% of the time

AWS Fargate vs Heroku

Compared 10% of the time

Google App Engine vs Heroku

Compared 7% of the time

Render vs Heroku

Compared 7% of the time

More Heroku Competitors

Red Hat OpenShift vs Virtuozzo Application Platform

Compared 30% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Virtuozzo Application Platform

Compared 28% of the time

Microsoft Azure vs Virtuozzo Application Platform

Compared 25% of the time

More Virtuozzo Application Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Heroku

June 2025

Download Heroku product report

Buyer's Guide

PaaS Clouds

June 2025

Download Virtuozzo Application Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

Jelastic

Overview

Established in 2007, Heroku is a cloud application platform providing a streamlined, efficient place for web app developers to create and deploy their applications. Heroku is designed to maximize developer productivity. With the entire web application development process available on the Herokucloud, creating and rolling out web apps has been made more efficient, convenient, and cost-effective than ever before.

Heroku

Your Platform as a Service solution for DevOps hosting!

An elastic, high performance PaaS solution for cloud and hosting providers. The easy way to sell cloud hosting to DevOps-focused SaaS companies.

Turnkey application hosting for DevOps.

Sell PaaS alongside your existing products. The Virtuozzo Application Platform runs on the infrastructure you have today – even virtualized in your cloud or hosting platform.

It makes DevOps hosting fast, easy and cost-effective – and with true consumption-based billing, it gives you a real competitive advantage over hyperscale clouds.

Platform as a Service opens up new markets for your business: you can sell hosting to any company that depends on DevOps for internal or customer-facing IT.

Virtuozzo

Sample Customers

Facebook, UrbanDictionary, Code for America, Mailchimp, Rapportive, GitHub, TED, and Lyft.

Hosting Providers: Hidora, Elastx, eApps, SaveInCloud, Infomaniak, Layershift, Valtti, Dogado, Locaweb, Planeetta, dogado, ServInt, Hostnet, Info.nl, Innofield, Lunacloud, Reg.ru, Websolute Private Cloud and Integrators: Joe's Datacenter, Croc, Ciklum, Vergence, Centerprise, GMV Soluciones

Buyer's Guide

Heroku vs. Virtuozzo Application Platform

June 2025

Free Report: Heroku vs. Virtuozzo Application Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Heroku vs. Virtuozzo Application Platform and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,687 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Heroku vs. Virtuozzo Application Platform report.

See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.

We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.