We changed our name from IT Central Station: Here's why

HashiCorp Terraform vs Micro Focus ZENworks Configuration Management comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Red Hat, Quest Software and others in Configuration Management. Updated: January 2022.
564,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"I like the function that shows me a preview of what is happening in the infrastructure.""This solution is a fast and secure way to provision infrastructure.""The ARM template is very easy to work with, which is a big help to us.""One of the most valuable features is that it offers the ability to create a VPC, Virtual Private Cloud and VPN connectivity to the VPC can be automated without having to do it manually.""The state backend, automated describe functionality, modular structures, and variablization using templates are most valuable.""The solution allows us to work faster with ease and to set up new environments and workspaces.""One of the most valuable features is that it offers the ability to create a VPC, Virtual Private Cloud and VPN connectivity to the VPC can be automated without having to do it manually.""The most valuable feature is the support for different platforms like cloud, datacenters, VCS, databases, various storage types, and Kubernetes."

More HashiCorp Terraform Pros →

"The most valuable feature is the impact analysis."

More Micro Focus ZENworks Configuration Management Pros →

Cons
"If you are copying something from a well running machine to a remote machine, there are some issues with the current version, but it is acceptable.""They have added a feature that helps us to import existing resources to our workspace, but if they can help us to create the code for the import, as well, then it would be a great addition.""This solution could be improved by adding features such as CDM to accelerate the access of data by the users.""I would like to see a short-term option for a short-term plan.""I still struggle a bit when configuring VPNs when we have multiple rules. If we have five or six virtual private clouds and we have to give rights between those multiple VPCs, we can have big problems. I think it was a learning curve and then we improved it.""The state locking functionality can be improved. In certain situations, we have to force-unlock the state, which sometimes does not work. When that happens, we have to manually go to the state backend and remove that particular state, which is kind of a cumbersome process. It should also have more functions, more expressions, and support for more products.""On a scale from one to ten, I would give this solution a rating of seven; strictly because I was uncomfortable using the ARM template earlier. After another six months, I am sure I will give it a rating of 10, but at this point in time in my experience, I say seven, but not because of the tool itself."

More HashiCorp Terraform Cons →

"The native UI should be simplified because it is outdated and a little bit over-complicated."

More Micro Focus ZENworks Configuration Management Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The setup for Terraform is quite easy and currently, we are using their community version along with Jenkins."
  • "They have given it to us at a monthly cost, but it is on a yearly basis."
  • More HashiCorp Terraform Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Configuration Management solutions are best for your needs.
    564,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer: 
    The state backend, automated describe functionality, modular structures, and variablization using templates are most valuable.
    Top Answer: 
    They have given it to us at a monthly cost, but it is on a yearly basis.
    Top Answer: 
    The state locking functionality can be improved. In certain situations, we have to force-unlock the state, which sometimes does not work. When that happens, we have to manually go to the state backend… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    6th
    Views
    2,860
    Comparisons
    2,137
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    549
    Rating
    8.6
    13th
    Views
    637
    Comparisons
    460
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    600
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Terraform
    HPE CMS, HPE Configuration Management, Micro Focus Configuration Management
    Learn More
    HashiCorp
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    HashiCorp was founded by Mitchell Hashimoto and Armon Dadgar in 2012 with the goal of revolutionizing datacenter management: application development, delivery, and maintenance.
    The datacenter of today is very different than the datacenter of yesterday, and we think the datacenter of tomorrow is just around the corner. We're writing software to take you all the way from yesterday to today, and then safely to tomorrow and beyond.
    Physical, virtual, containers. Private cloud, public cloud, hybrid cloud. IaaS, PaaS, SaaS. Windows, Linux, Mac. These are just some of the choices faced when architecting a datacenter of today. And the choice is not one or the other; instead, it is often a combination of many of these.
    HashiCorp builds tools to ease these decisions by presenting solutions that span the gaps. Our tools manage both physical machines and virtual machines, Windows, and Linux, SaaS and IaaS, etc. And we're committed to supporting next-generation technologies, as well.
    HashiCorp was founded and continues to be run by the primary authors of all our core technologies powering thousands of companies worldwide. We speak at conferences and write books related to application and infrastructure management.
    All our foundational technologies are open source and developed openly, and have been since 2010.
    The Tao of HashiCorp is the foundation that guides our vision, roadmap, and product design. As you evaluate using or contributing to HashiCorp's products, it may be valuable to understand the motivations and intentions for our work. Learn more about the Tao of HashiCorp here: https://www.hashicorp.com/tao-of-hashicorp

    Micro Focus' Configuration Management System is a comprehensive set of CMDB tools collects, stores, manages, updates, and presents data about software and infrastructure services configuration so you can lower costs and mitigate risk.

    Offer
    Learn more about HashiCorp Terraform
    Learn more about Micro Focus ZENworks Configuration Management
    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Tech Mahindra, NNIT, ASIC
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company24%
    Comms Service Provider22%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Government7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company25%
    Comms Service Provider23%
    Government8%
    Educational Organization6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business56%
    Large Enterprise44%
    No Data Available
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Red Hat, Quest Software and others in Configuration Management. Updated: January 2022.
    564,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    HashiCorp Terraform is ranked 6th in Configuration Management with 7 reviews while Micro Focus ZENworks Configuration Management is ranked 13th in Configuration Management with 1 review. HashiCorp Terraform is rated 8.8, while Micro Focus ZENworks Configuration Management is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of HashiCorp Terraform writes "Creating a VPC and VPN connectivity to the VPC can be automated". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Micro Focus ZENworks Configuration Management writes "Helpful impact analysis and the discovery capability is quite good". HashiCorp Terraform is most compared with Red Hat Satellite, Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager, SaltStack, BMC TrueSight Server Automation and ManageEngine OS Deployer, whereas Micro Focus ZENworks Configuration Management is most compared with Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager, BMC TrueSight Server Automation, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Quest KACE Systems Management and SaltStack.

    See our list of best Configuration Management vendors.

    We monitor all Configuration Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.