HackerOne vs RiskIQ Illuminate comparison

HackerOne and RiskIQ are both solutions in the Attack Surface Management (ASM) category. HackerOne is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.5, while RiskIQ is ranked #30. HackerOne holds a 4.9% mindshare in ASM, compared to RiskIQ’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of HackerOne users are willing to recommend the solution.

HackerOne

Read 9 HackerOne reviews

4,307 Views
1,594 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

RiskIQ Illuminate

Read 1 RiskIQ Illuminate review

470 Views
249 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

HackerOne

RiskIQ Illuminate

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

HackerOne and RiskIQ Illuminate compete in the cybersecurity domain. RiskIQ Illuminate stands out due to comprehensive features, while HackerOne offers competitive pricing and strong support.

Features: HackerOne provides customizable vulnerability management, robust reporting tools, and competitive pricing. RiskIQ Illuminate offers extensive threat intelligence, asset discovery, and a broader threat landscape view.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HackerOne's straightforward deployment enhances user adoption and responsive support. RiskIQ Illuminate's complex setup is offset by in-depth customer service.

Pricing and ROI: HackerOne provides cost-effective pricing with notable ROI for smaller organizations. RiskIQ has higher setup costs but offers substantial ROI for those needing exhaustive security auditing capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Attack Surface Management (ASM) Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Attack Surface Management (ASM)

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,444 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HackerOne

Ranking in Attack Surface Management (ASM)

8th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (16th), Vulnerability Management (29th), Bug Bounty Platforms (1st), Penetration Testing Services (2nd), AI Observability (10th)

RiskIQ Illuminate

Ranking in Attack Surface Management (ASM)

30th

Average Rating

0.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Attack Surface Management (ASM) category, the mindshare of HackerOne is 4.9%, down from 5.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of RiskIQ Illuminate is 1.0%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Attack Surface Management (ASM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
HackerOne	4.9%
RiskIQ Illuminate	1.0%
Other	94.1%

Attack Surface Management (ASM)

Featured Reviews

Ruphus Muita

Senior ICT Security Consultant at Applied Principles Limited

Has improved my motivation to submit bugs consistently through fast response and clear filtering

I think HackerOne can be improved by allowing new users to gain access to certain programs that are only open to known, renowned users. Sometimes new users don't receive invites just because they are new, despite potentially being very skilled hackers, so I feel new users should get more chances and opportunities. I am currently satisfied with the rewards, response time, and other aspects of the platform, so I don't have anything else to add about the necessary improvements. I give HackerOne a nine out of ten because if new hackers are given more opportunities, it could be a perfect 10 for me. However, the reason I gave a nine is that I don't have much to complain about; I specifically love the program and don't have many concerns.

Read full review

SimonClark

Cyber Security Advisor - Director at Fort Net UK

Able to discover unpatched servers, offers good stability, and scales very well

A low-cost service to evaluate the risk score of a supply chain would be very helpful. This could be useful for insurance companies offering cyber insurance to enterprise customers, providing the insurer with a valuable way to unobtrusively, quickly, and frequently assess their customers and apply appropriate premiums for the level of risk. This would also be useful for enterprises. They could, for example, assess companies prior to a merger or acquisition. What would also be useful for any enterprise would be if their supply chain has some kind of direct digital access to parts of their network.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"If you have a very critical vulnerability, some good companies will acknowledge it and pay you accordingly based on severity."

"HackerOne is larger than WebCloud and has a better reputation than BugCloud, which results in a smoother process."

"Apart from getting all the bug bounty opportunities, we also get the chance to practice in a safe environment, like a demo setup. These features are great for beginners who want to explore bug bounties in the future."

"The most valuable feature of HackerOne is its variety of programs. These programs provide depth into various areas, such as mobile, API, and websites."

"HackerOne has been the right fit for our current situation from both a functionality and cost-effectiveness perspective."

"The fast verification process impacts my motivation significantly because a quick response keeps me motivated, and if I'm going to try and hunt bugs today, I would appreciate a response within the day or at least within a few days."

"HackerOne is a very good platform with the trust of different companies including Shopify, PayPal, and Uber, which creates a stronger brand perception and competitive market positioning."

"HackerOne is larger than WebCloud and has a better reputation than BugCloud, which results in a smoother process."

More HackerOne pros

"Attack Surface Management provided our customers with visibility on everything in their network and domains - anything publicly-facing on the internet - and shows where they have potential vulnerabilities."

"The solution is stable with 12 years of established historical data."

Cons

"Response time can be improved. The HackerOne Trust team can be slow to respond sometimes. They're not using AI, which could help reduce the number of duplicate reports."

"Triage response time is a significant issue. The response time and triage speed are not fast enough, and this is causing many people to leave HackerOne."

"HackerOne provides a "HackBot" which helps identify other relevant reports, including duplicates, public reports from other companies, etc. However, the functionality is limited and it would be nice to integrate it with broader services offered like auto responses, triggers, etc."

"One issue I've experienced is traffic. Many people try to participate when an opportunity with a bounty of around 1,000-15,000 dollars comes up. In this case, the first person to report the vulnerability gets the bounty. If a second person reports the same vulnerability, they are marked as duplicated instead of receiving some recognition. The second person also invested time finding the issue, so I think this can be improved."

"However, I reduced my rating by one mark because a proper internal triage team should be in place, not as a replacement for internal security controls."

"The ability to view the conversation between the triagers and the programs will be really good."

"Everything has become slower on HackerOne."

"Sometimes new users don't receive invites just because they are new, despite potentially being very skilled hackers, so I feel new users should get more chances and opportunities."

More HackerOne cons

"A low-cost service to evaluate the risk score of a supply chain would be very helpful."

"The product scales from small to enormous, however, the pricing is not suitable for very small companies."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool is open-source and free for bug bounty hunters."

"The solution is free."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Attack Surface Management (ASM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,444 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HackerOne?

I have not experienced any costs since I use HackerOne independently, just logging into the site, hunting bugs, and submitting them without any expenses.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HackerOne?

HackerOne has trust from companies such as Shopify, PayPal, and Uber, which provides a stronger brand perception and competitive market positioning. However, I reduced my rating by one mark because...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HackerOne?

I use HackerOne for the bug bounty platform to find security issues. When we discover vulnerabilities, we receive awards for them. Before testing any new payment API for public release, we can have...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Bugcrowd vs HackerOne

Compared 33% of the time

Synack vs HackerOne

Compared 13% of the time

YesWeHack vs HackerOne

Compared 7% of the time

Intigriti vs HackerOne

Compared 5% of the time

BreachLock Penetration Testing Services vs HackerOne

Compared 4% of the time

More HackerOne Competitors

Mandiant Advantage vs RiskIQ Illuminate

Compared 22% of the time

Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) vs RiskIQ Illuminate

Compared 20% of the time

Trellix Network Detection and Response vs RiskIQ Illuminate

Compared 18% of the time

Recorded Future vs RiskIQ Illuminate

Compared 16% of the time

Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs RiskIQ Illuminate

Compared 13% of the time

More RiskIQ Illuminate Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HackerOne

March 2026

Download HackerOne product report

Buyer's Guide

Attack Surface Management (ASM)

March 2026

Download RiskIQ Illuminate product report

Also Known As

HackerOne Assets, HackerOne Pentesting Services, HackerOne Security Assessments, HackerOne Vulnerability Management

RiskIQ Digital Threat Management

Overview

HackerOne leads in offensive security with a platform that expertly identifies and remedies security vulnerabilities using AI and a vast researcher community. Trusted by industry giants, it integrates bug bounties, vulnerability disclosure, and code security in software development.

The HackerOne Platform offers a comprehensive suite of services, combining advanced AI technology with the skills of a global security researcher community to address complex security challenges. It facilitates an understanding of vulnerabilities, promoting better remediation practices across software lifecycles. Notable clients include Anthropic, Crypto.com, General Motors, GitHub, Goldman Sachs, Uber, and U.S. Department of Defense. Recognized for innovation and workplace excellence, HackerOne continues to set standards in security solutions.

What key features does HackerOne offer?

Skilled Hacker Community: Access a large pool of expert security researchers.
Third-Party Integrations: Seamless compatibility with various tools like payment systems and project management applications.
Bug Bounty Programs: Incentivized vulnerability discovery across industries.
Direct Communication: Facilitates dialogue for better understanding of vulnerabilities.
Safe Practice Environments: Supports learning for both beginners and seasoned professionals.

Why is HackerOne beneficial for your needs?

Speed of Delivery: Quickly identifies and resolves security issues.
Responsive Support: Reliable assistance enhances user experience.
Transparency in Communication: Clear reporting processes aid in issue resolution.
Income Opportunities: Bug bounties offer financial incentives.

HackerOne finds significant applications in various sectors with its focus on vulnerability assessment, testing, and responsible disclosure. Organizations utilize it for ethical hacking and efficient vulnerability coordination, making it essential in cybersecurity strategies. The platform's reliability is evident in its ability to identify and document security threats effectively.

HackerOne

Threats are as vast as the internet. Defending your attack surface is a challenge of continuous change and global scale. RiskIQ Illuminate Internet Intelligence shows cyber threats relevant to your critical assets through connected digital relationships. It is the only security intelligence solution with tailored attack surface intelligence to uncover exposures, risks, and threats against your unique digital footprint, pinpointing what’s relevant to you—all in one place.

RiskIQ

Sample Customers

Anthropic, Crypto.com, General Motors, GitHub, Goldman Sachs, Uber, and the U.S. Department of Defense

DocuSign, Outbrain, The Economist Group, Rackspace, The Citizen Lab

Buyer's Guide

Attack Surface Management (ASM)

March 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, Qualys, TrendAI and others in Attack Surface Management (ASM). Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,444 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Attack Surface Management (ASM) vendors.

We monitor all Attack Surface Management (ASM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.