GoSecure Endpoint Security Lifecycle vs Symantec Patch Management comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between GoSecure Endpoint Security Lifecycle and Symantec Patch Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, HCLTech, Kaseya and others in Patch Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Patch Management Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
27th
out of 49 in Patch Management
Views
40
Comparisons
20
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
22nd
out of 49 in Patch Management
Views
356
Comparisons
242
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Patch Management
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, HCLTech, Kaseya and others in Patch Management. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
GoSecure ESL
Symantec Patch Management Solution
Learn More
Overview

Cybersecurity hygiene requires constant vigilance, including keeping all systems up to date with the latest patches. Even a single missed patch could expose your organization to a breach. When you manage enough workstations and servers, keeping software current can quickly become complex without patch management software to take care of it. GoSecure Endpoint Security Lifecycle (ESL) streamlines patch management by giving you granular control over your patch management policies.

Eliminate Endpoint Security Vulnerabilities
Poor patching, non-standard application deployment and unmanaged endpoint security put organizations at risk. GoSecure ESL protects, secures and manages your endpoints eliminating vulnerabilities that can cripple your operations. It helps you to achieve continuous control, protection and compliance. And with support for over 7000 applications, your can be assured that your most critical applications will remain patched against the latest vulnerabilities.

Symantec Patch Management Solution can assist organizations in meeting their security needs by automating the detection and facilitating the remediation of security vulnerabilities for multiple operating systems (Windows, Mac, Red Hat, CentOS and SUSE) and for Microsoft applications and over 50 third-party Windows applications (Adobe, Java Runtime, common browsers and plug-ins, etc.). Patch Management Solution provides visibility into newly released software updates and the means to identify computers susceptible to the vulnerabilities addressed by such updates. It also automates the download of software update packages from vendor sites and the distribution of those packages to computers which require those patches.

Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Adventist Health
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company14%
Financial Services Firm12%
Outsourcing Company9%
Healthcare Company9%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business11%
Midsize Enterprise22%
Large Enterprise67%
Buyer's Guide
Patch Management
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, HCLTech, Kaseya and others in Patch Management. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

GoSecure Endpoint Security Lifecycle is ranked 27th in Patch Management while Symantec Patch Management is ranked 22nd in Patch Management. GoSecure Endpoint Security Lifecycle is rated 0.0, while Symantec Patch Management is rated 0.0. On the other hand, GoSecure Endpoint Security Lifecycle is most compared with , whereas Symantec Patch Management is most compared with Microsoft Configuration Manager, Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager and ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus.

See our list of best Patch Management vendors.

We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.