Google App Engine vs Oracle Java Cloud Service comparison

Google and Oracle are both solutions in the PaaS Clouds category. Google is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.3, while Oracle is ranked #17 with an average rating of 7.7. Google holds a 2.1% mindshare in PSP, compared to Oracle’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Google App Engine

Read 36 Google App Engine reviews

1,625 Views
1,495 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Oracle Java Cloud Service

Read 16 Oracle Java Cloud Service reviews

342 Views
239 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Google App Engine

Oracle Java Cloud Service

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Google App Engine and Oracle Java Cloud Service compete in offering scalable cloud solutions. Google App Engine has the upper hand in terms of pricing and support due to its more attractive cost structure, while Oracle Java Cloud Service is superior in features, justifying its higher price for many users.

Features: Google App Engine offers ease of scalability, automatic load balancing, and seamless integration with Google's ecosystem, perfect for projects requiring rapid scaling. Oracle Java Cloud Service stands out with robust Java integration, advanced enterprise-level features, and excellent database management, benefiting businesses focused on comprehensive Java environments.

Room for Improvement: Google App Engine could enhance flexibility by allowing more customizable service choices and offering a more comprehensive free tier. Additionally, improving integration options with non-Google services could extend its usability. Oracle Java Cloud Service could benefit from simplifying its setup process, reducing Java dependency, and improving security without sacrificing flexibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Google App Engine provides simplified deployment processes and excellent support channels, granting more flexibility and quicker turnaround for developers. Oracle Java Cloud Service involves a more detailed setup process with notable dependence on Java expertise, potentially extending deployment times, though offering robust enterprise support.

Pricing and ROI: Google App Engine's cost-effective pay-as-you-go pricing model offers savings, particularly for smaller projects, with a high ROI due to lower operational costs. Oracle Java Cloud Service, with a higher initial setup cost reflecting its extensive features, can provide substantial ROI for large enterprises deeply relying on Java applications, offering worthwhile investment for those needing robust capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Google App Engine vs. Oracle Java Cloud Service Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Google App Engine vs. Oracle Java Cloud Service

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Google App Engine

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

7th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle Java Cloud Service

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

17th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the PaaS Clouds category, the mindshare of Google App Engine is 2.1%, down from 2.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Java Cloud Service is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

PaaS Clouds

Featured Reviews

Chandra Shekar Reddy Arrabolu

Associate Projects at Cognizant

Effortless server management and automatic scaling boost productivity

The error logging system in Google App Engine could be enhanced. While there are troubleshooting documents with Google-defined error logs, identifying the exact root cause can be challenging. Often, issues must be escalated through support to product engineering teams who access internal logs for resolution. Increasing the visibility of logging would help users identify issues more easily. Regarding runtimes, the validity period limitations can be problematic. When companies use legacy applications, migrating to new versions requires significant code changes and isn't always a simple lift-and-shift operation. Google App Engine should consider continuing to provide security patches for legacy applications, especially for customers with substantial billing. The manual scaling feature needs improvement, as it isn't available for all runtimes. Adding this capability across all runtimes would be beneficial for controlling instance scaling within specific parameters.

Read full review

Adam Elguennioui

SAP Consultant at SA&BC

Offers flexibility and better accessibility to users

The security part of the tool is not so strong, making it an area I would like to see improved in the solution. When working with a cloud tool, it's never 100 percent secure and it is always something to take into account. I would like to be more comfortable working with it and feeling safer. In the future, the tool can be made faster. In the future, I would like to see maybe some AI features in the tool to help automate stuff. You need to be able to create your own models to help create some automated actions.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features of Google App Engine include the ease of rolling back deployments when failures occur, the ability to track deployment times, and the feature to split traffic between different instances."

"The WhatApp feature is the most valuable."

"What I find most beneficial about Google App Engine is that we do not need to manage it since it's a fully managed serverless platform, allowing us to spend more time on development rather than managing and maintaining configurations."

"Seurity features - unauthorized individuals are unable to access certain applications."

"The product's setup and deployment phases are easy."

"I've noticed measurable benefits and return on investment by choosing Google App Engine."

"Administering App Engine is simple; it has intuitive UIs and a very scalable app engine."

"I've found that all of the features are valuable, especially the shared drive and the ability for multiple people to use their documents at the same time."

More Google App Engine pros

"Cloud has provided less maintenance."

"One key feature is getting to choose the Virtual Machine configurations while setting up the server, which is an automated process."

"Self-provisioning, easy to choose from WebLogic 11g to 12c."

"The automated features of auto-purging in 12c helps clear disk space on a routine basis."

"Backing up and recovery for my domain is very easy and fast. In addition, applying patches and undoing applied patches is effective and easy to do."

"The framework supports auto-configuration. A lot of features are already there. It is reliable and user-friendly to develop code, back-end engineering, or locate specific information such as addresses."

"It is pretty easy to use."

"The auto-backup, incremental backup and restoration features can be invaluable for management."

More Oracle Java Cloud Service pros

Cons

"The main drawback with Google App Engine's standard environment was its restrictions. We could not work with file systems, run shell scripts from the environment, or use WebSockets."

"The areas of Google App Engine that I would to improve or enhance include its allowance for complete end-to-end deployment and scalability; however, it is manageable only for a few languages."

"Currently, we have to use Google CLI and utilize Google App CLI SDKs for deployment. If options were available to enable these SDKs for Terraform and CloudFormation, it would be more helpful for executing one-click deployments."

"I am limited to sending a photo to five people. I want to be able to send a photo to many people, not just five."

"The areas of Google App Engine I would to see improved or enhanced in the future include expanding inbuilt support for more programming languages than the current limited options such as Python, Go, and Node, ideally adding support for languages such as Java."

"Difficult to assess how pricing is managed."

"I would like a simpler deployment tool on laptops. It is a bit complicated at the moment. We know how to do it, but it could be easier to deploy it on laptops."

"The only concern is that there is a number of the offerings which are built on their own proprietary technologies. With some of the offerings in Google Cloud, it's difficult to have a path to migrate to other cloud providers."

More Google App Engine cons

"The security part of the tool is not so strong, making it an area I would like to see improved in the solution."

"The product is satisfactory but we need more training on managing the machine itself. For example, how do we add more storage, how do we extend a specific portion? I would like to see videos illustrating some of the technical tasks that we often need to do."

"There are issues with the application's development, including small glitches and errors."

"Needs better integration with other Oracle/non-Oracle products."

"The product's high price is an area of concern where improvements are required."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would like to have more free application with it. Some of the applications, I am paying more for them. I think that they must be free."

"If we don't know how to work with the tool, we might have some spikes in price."

"We pay the license yearly. It's about $6 a month, which is $72 a year per person, so it's about $500."

"Oracle is a little more expensive right now, but not much compared to SAP. Oracle's prices are very much dependent on the scale of the project and how many users are there."

"It is somewhat expensive."

"Oracle Java Cloud Service is an expensive product."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user8586

Engineer at a tech consulting company with 51-200 employees

Aug 14, 2013

Amazon vs Rackspace vs Microsoft vs Google: Cloud Hosting Services Comparison

Amazon Web Services, Rackspace OpenStack, Microsoft Windows Azure and Google are the major cloud hosting and storage service providers. Athough Amazon is top of them and is oldest in cloud market, Rackspace, Microsoft and Google are giving tough competition to each other and to Amazon also for…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Educational Organization

12%

Financial Services Firm

University

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Google App Engine?

The product's setup and deployment phases are easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google App Engine?

I haven't been involved on the pricing side, so I'm not exactly aware of the costs, although we did analyze log retention costs, but overall, I'm not sure how Google App Engine compares to other pr...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Google App Engine?

I have not yet used the real-time logging feature.

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle Java Cloud Service?

The solution's technical support is good.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Java Cloud Service?

I did a comparative study on the pricing between Oracle and SAP S/4HANA, but it was related to databases and in the areas associated with the clouds. I can tell that Oracle is a little more expensi...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Java Cloud Service?

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure vs Google App Engine

Compared 29% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Google App Engine

Compared 23% of the time

Heroku vs Google App Engine

Compared 13% of the time

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Google App Engine

Compared 10% of the time

Amazon Lightsail vs Google App Engine

Compared 6% of the time

More Google App Engine Competitors

Oracle Application Container Cloud Service vs Oracle Java Cloud Service

Compared 36% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Oracle Java Cloud Service

Compared 34% of the time

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service vs Oracle Java Cloud Service

Compared 30% of the time

More Oracle Java Cloud Service Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Google App Engine

August 2025

Download Google App Engine product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Java Cloud Service

August 2025

Download Oracle Java Cloud Service product report

Overview

Google App Engine is a Platform-as-a-Service (Paas) provider that equips web application developers with all the resources and tools that they need to develop, test, and run their applications on Google's infrastructure. Everything is built into the kit, so with one download of the SDK, you'll be well on your way to first-rate apps.

Google

Oracle Java Cloud Service is a complete platform and infrastructure cloud solution for building, deploying, and managing Java EE applications. Use Oracle Java Cloud Service to rapidly provision an application environment with Oracle WebLogic Server as the application container, Oracle Coherence as a caching and data grid tier, and Oracle Traffic Director as the software load balancer—all on top of infrastructure provided by Oracle Compute Cloud Service.

For more information on Oracle Java Cloud Service, visit Oracle.com

Oracle

Sample Customers

Khan Academy, Best Buy, Gigya, MetOffice, Getaround, Mimiboard, NewsLimited, WebFilings, and CloudLock.

Avaya, ADNOC Distribution, DocuSign, Zamil Industrial Investment Company

Buyer's Guide

Google App Engine vs. Oracle Java Cloud Service

July 2025

Free Report: Google App Engine vs. Oracle Java Cloud Service

Find out what your peers are saying about Google App Engine vs. Oracle Java Cloud Service and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Google App Engine vs. Oracle Java Cloud Service report.

See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.

We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.