GitLab vs OpenText ALM Octane comparison

GitLab and OpenText are both solutions in the Enterprise Agile Planning Tools category. GitLab is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.6, while OpenText is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.3. GitLab holds a 26.9% mindshare in EAP, compared to OpenText’s 2.5% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of GitLab users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

GitLab

Read 84 GitLab reviews

10,051 Views
8,300 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

OpenText ALM Octane

Read 41 OpenText ALM Octane reviews

953 Views
540 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

GitLab

OpenText ALM Octane

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

OpenText ALM Octane and GitLab are competitive products in the Agile management and DevOps markets. GitLab holds an advantage due to its superior CI/CD pipeline capabilities and ease of use.

Features: OpenText ALM Octane offers comprehensive Agile management capabilities, seamless DevOps integrations, and end-to-end traceability in testing processes. GitLab provides robust CI/CD pipeline capabilities, ease of use, and strong version control management.

Room for Improvement: OpenText ALM Octane could improve in managing different methodologies and administrative functions. It also faces challenges with some missing features like task comments. GitLab could enhance integration beyond Kubernetes, provide better documentation, and reduce pricing for advanced tiers.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText ALM Octane offers on-premises deployment with robust support, including direct R&D involvement. GitLab leverages public cloud deployment, providing straightforward support but sometimes faces delays in problem resolution.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText ALM Octane is expensive, with its comprehensive features justifying its cost. GitLab, starting as open-source, can become costly with scale but offers flexible licensing that users find valuable.

To learn more, read our detailed GitLab vs. OpenText ALM Octane Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitLab vs. OpenText ALM Octane

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,760 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

7.6

GitLab offers excellent ROI by reducing deployment time, supporting users, improving DevOps scores, and enhancing project management.

Sentiment score

6.9

OpenText ALM Octane reduces costs and increases efficiency by automating processes, streamlining project management, and enhancing analytics.

Migrating to GitLab is bringing time-saving benefits, and everything is easier to automate.

reviewer2603940

IT Manager at a tech company with 5,001-10,000 employees

We have saved time significantly, reducing deployment time from four hours to five minutes per deployment.

Andrea PICCININI

IT Software Architect at ANAC - Autorità Nazionale Anticorruzione

For more quotes and insights, download the GitLab report

The ability to generate audit evidence with a single click saves ten days of work for ten people, enabling them to focus on other tasks.

Peter-Paul Eijkenboom

Senior Test Automation Specialist at APG

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText ALM Octane report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

6.8

GitLab's customer support is generally well-regarded, with users appreciating community forums, fast responses for paid versions, and third-party assistance.

Sentiment score

7.4

OpenText ALM Octane's support is praised for responsiveness and expertise but needs improvement in follow-up times and complex cases.

We have rarely needed to escalate issues to technical support since GitLab usually runs seamlessly.

Gaurav Chandel

AWS DevOps/ Site Reliability Engineer at Tata Consultancy

I have interacted with architects for some advice during the implementation, and they were prompt in their response.

Mikhael Ibrahim

Platform Engineer & Manager at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

I have had meetings where they taught me, explained things, and provided guidance for starting from scratch.

reviewer2603940

IT Manager at a tech company with 5,001-10,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the GitLab report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText ALM Octane report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

7.4

GitLab's scalable container architecture efficiently manages diverse user sizes, with potential improvements for large deployments and on-premises setups.

Sentiment score

7.3

OpenText ALM Octane is scalable, integrates well with DevOps tools, but users face licensing issues despite reliable performance.

It has all the features required for our coding and deployment needs, which makes it scalable to our changing requirements.

Sarfaraz Khan

Senior Application Developer at IBM

We're transitioning to OpenShift for future scalability with increased user numbers.

Mikhael Ibrahim

Platform Engineer & Manager at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

For scaling, other deployment options from GitLab's side need to be adopted.

Rohit Kesharwani

Manager, Engineering at 7-Eleven

For more quotes and insights, download the GitLab report

We can expand the number of servers and resources as required.

Peter-Paul Eijkenboom

Senior Test Automation Specialist at APG

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText ALM Octane report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

8.2

GitLab is highly stable, with minimal glitches, reliable performance under pressure, and user satisfaction ratings of 7-10.

Sentiment score

7.9

OpenText ALM Octane offers highly stable performance with minimal issues, regular updates, and efficient support addressing any concerns.

I have not encountered any performance or stability issues with GitLab so far.

Gaurav Chandel

AWS DevOps/ Site Reliability Engineer at Tata Consultancy

The updates are frequent and demanding, happening at least once a week due to security reasons.

Andrew Schetinin

Chief Technology Officer at Acclym

For more quotes and insights, download the GitLab report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText ALM Octane report

Room For Improvement

GitLab requires better AWS integration, UI, documentation, project management, security, and reduced pricing with enhanced leadership dashboards and testing tools.

OpenText ALM Octane struggles with integration, flexibility, and user management, needing improvements in security, support, and Agile processes.

It would be beneficial to have a user-friendly interface for setting up these configurations, instead of just writing YAML files.

reviewer2603940

IT Manager at a tech company with 5,001-10,000 employees

It is essential to conduct proper testing, such as unit tests and code coverage, within the SDLC pipelines.

Rohit Kesharwani

Manager, Engineering at 7-Eleven

GitLab can improve its user interface to make conflict resolution more user-friendly.

Sarfaraz Khan

Senior Application Developer at IBM

For more quotes and insights, download the GitLab report

While it aims to be as flexible as possible for a large enterprise application, sometimes there are limitations that may not meet specific organizational needs.

Peter-Paul Eijkenboom

Senior Test Automation Specialist at APG

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText ALM Octane report

Setup Cost

GitLab offers free and paid plans, with enterprise options valued for features but sometimes seen as expensive.

OpenText ALM Octane is costly but valued for its features and scalability, offering ROI and enhanced support.

Even when working in other small organizations, we opted for GitLab as it was cost-efficient.

Sarfaraz Khan

Senior Application Developer at IBM

The pricing of GitLab is reasonable, aligning with what I consider to be average compared to competitors.

reviewer2603940

IT Manager at a tech company with 5,001-10,000 employees

The price is high, and it limits user accessibility.

Andrea PICCININI

IT Software Architect at ANAC - Autorità Nazionale Anticorruzione

For more quotes and insights, download the GitLab report

OpenText ALM Octane is an expensive product.

Peter-Paul Eijkenboom

Senior Test Automation Specialist at APG

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText ALM Octane report

Valuable Features

GitLab excels in CI/CD with user-friendly interfaces, seamless integration, automation, and scalability, enhancing productivity and collaboration.

OpenText ALM Octane offers extensive agile management, robust test management, seamless integrations, and flexibility for Agile and Waterfall methodologies.

As we implement automated testing and DevSecOps, it speeds up the process by forty to sixty percent.

Mikhael Ibrahim

Platform Engineer & Manager at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

The Ultimate version offers enhanced features for security scanning through DAST and SAST analysis, which have greatly benefitted our project workflow.

Andrea PICCININI

IT Software Architect at ANAC - Autorità Nazionale Anticorruzione

By integrating GitLab as a DevOps platform, we have enhanced agility, improved our time to market, and different teams can work collaboratively on various projects.

Rohit Kesharwani

Manager, Engineering at 7-Eleven

For more quotes and insights, download the GitLab report

Its ability to generate audit evidence with a single click is a significant advantage, as it saves considerable time and money compared to manual processes.

Peter-Paul Eijkenboom

Senior Test Automation Specialist at APG

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText ALM Octane report

Categories and Ranking

GitLab

Ranking in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools

2nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (9th), Build Automation (1st), Release Automation (2nd), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (7th), Rapid Application Development Software (11th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (5th), Fuzz Testing Tools (2nd), DevSecOps (3rd)

OpenText ALM Octane

Ranking in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools

7th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Enterprise Agile Planning Tools category, the mindshare of GitLab is 26.9%, down from 32.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText ALM Octane is 2.5%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Agile Planning Tools

Featured Reviews

Rohit Kesharwani

Manager, Engineering at 7-Eleven

Improved agility and time to market with CI/CD enhancements

The CI/CD pipelines in GitLab ( /products/gitlab-reviews ) are highly valuable. Another important feature is the single source of repository, allowing efficient repository management and source code management. GitLab provides manageability by allowing us to manage source code effectively through separate repositories. Additionally, GitLab enables the creation of individual CI/CD pipelines for each repository, making software more agile. By integrating GitLab as a DevOps platform, we have enhanced agility, improved our time to market, and different teams can work collaboratively on various projects.

Read full review

GeorgNauerz

Managing Partner at Georg Nauerz Consulting

Makes team collaboration between IT and non-IT users easier with more transparency

The user experience is a lot better than any tool that I have used before. Overall, it is great. It has a smooth interface, which is very user-friendly. It makes it easier to work together and have more transparency and customization, which is very good. There are a lot of features where you can add fields, input individual fields, and input rules, like templated rule-based interaction between entities. The Backlog management is really interesting, because it is all in one place. You don't have a feature here and a feature there, instead you have the Backlog and testing using different backup items, like user storage features and tasks, all in one place. In addition, we are able to write documents, which we can transfer to backup items. Then, we can test them in the same solution without switching tools, or even switching from one part of the tool to another part, because it is all in one place. We use the solution’s Backlog and Team Backlog capabilities. They make our DevOps processes easier through transparency and asset collaboration.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Agile Planning Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

22%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

26%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitLab?

I find the features and version control history to be most valuable for our development workflow. These aspects provide us with a clear view of changes and help us manage requests efficiently.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitLab?

The pricing of GitLab is reasonable, aligning with what I consider to be average compared to competitors.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitLab?

Certain features in Jira are not available in GitLab, such as the functionality to have weights at the milestone and epic levels. Hopefully, these features will be resolved with work items in GitLa...

See all answers

Is Jira better or would you go with Micro Focus ALM Octane?

Hi Netanya, Basically , it all depends on the use cases for your environment and the business needs. Hope the below data may be relevant to you for identifying your needs and deciding on the approp...

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus ALM Octane?

The platform's most valuable feature is pipeline integration or continuous integration services.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus ALM Octane?

OpenText ALM Octane is an expensive product. However, it offsets costs by saving time and money, thus creating a balance between expenses and benefits. Our organization with over 1500 users sees sa...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs GitLab

Compared 26% of the time

GitHub CoPilot vs GitLab

Compared 14% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitLab

Compared 7% of the time

AWS CodePipeline vs GitLab

Compared 5% of the time

Tekton vs GitLab

Compared 5% of the time

More GitLab Competitors

Jira vs OpenText ALM Octane

Compared 49% of the time

OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs OpenText ALM Octane

Compared 26% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText ALM Octane

Compared 8% of the time

Rally Software vs OpenText ALM Octane

Compared 3% of the time

IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) vs OpenText ALM Octane

Compared 1% of the time

More OpenText ALM Octane Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitLab

May 2025

Download GitLab product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText ALM Octane

April 2025

Download OpenText ALM Octane product report

Also Known As

Fuzzit

Micro Focus ALM Octane, Micro Focus Octane

Overview

GitLab is a complete DevOps platform that enables teams to collaborate and deliver software faster.

It provides a single application for the entire DevOps lifecycle, from planning and development to testing, deployment, and monitoring.

With GitLab, teams can streamline their workflows, automate processes, and improve productivity.

GitLab

OpenText ALM Octane helps organizations implement a “quality everywhere” approach and improve Agile and DevOps development and testing processes to improve the flow of work across the software delivery value stream. You can tightly align quality efforts from development to release, employ a broad range of tests anchored by automation, and continuously monitor and improve for increased throughput. OpenText fosters an open approach so that quality is visible, traceable, and continuously improved. By synchronizing quality and testing with Agile and DevOps processes, risks are mitigated early in the software delivery value stream – speeding the way for faster delivery and improved customer satisfaction.

ALM Octane facilitates a tailored and scalable approach for large enterprises. You can deploy your way and minimize infrastructure needs with deployment options spanning on-premises, SaaS, and public cloud (Amazon Web Services and Microsoft Azure Marketplaces). Similarly, various licensing options can tailor the features to meet specific needs with support for thousands of concurrent users in geographically disperse locations.

OpenText

Sample Customers

1. NASA 2. IBM 3. Sony 4. Alibaba 5. CERN 6. Siemens 7. Volkswagen 8. ING 9. Ticketmaster 10. SpaceX 11. Adobe 12. Intuit 13. Autodesk 14. Rakuten 15. Unity Technologies 16. Pandora 17. Electronic Arts 18. Nordstrom 19. Verizon 20. Comcast 21. Philips 22. Deutsche Telekom 23. Orange 24. Fujitsu 25. Ericsson 26. Nokia 27. General Electric 28. Cisco 29. Accenture 30. Deloitte 31. PwC 32. KPMG

Orange, Airbus, Haufe Group, Kellogg's, Claro, Bon Secours, World Wide Technology

Buyer's Guide

GitLab vs. OpenText ALM Octane

April 2025

Free Report: GitLab vs. OpenText ALM Octane

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab vs. OpenText ALM Octane and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitLab vs. OpenText ALM Octane report.

See our list of best Enterprise Agile Planning Tools vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Agile Planning Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.