We performed a comparison between GitLab and Inedo BuildMaster based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation."A user friendly solution."
"The most valuable feature of GitLab is the automatic merging of code."
"We have seen a couple of merge requests or pull requests raised in GitLab. I see the interface, the way it shows the difference between the two source codes, that it is easy for anyone to do the review and then accept the request; the pull request is the valuable feature."
"I have found the most valuable feature is security control. I also like the branching and cloning software."
"GitLab's best features are continuous integration and fast deployment."
"GitLab offers a good interface for doing code reviews between two colleagues."
"GitLab is very useful for pipelines, continuous integration, and continuous deployment. It is also stable."
"I like that you can use GitLab as a double-sided solution for both DevOps and version management. It's a good product for working in these two areas, and the user interface makes it easy to understand."
"Technical support is quick to respond. I haven't had any issues with them."
"GitLab can improve by integrating with more tools, such as servers with Docker."
"GitLab can improve the integration with third-party applications. It could be made easier. Additionally, having API control from my application could be helpful."
"GitLab could improve the patch repository. It does not have support for Conan patch version regions. Additionally, better support for Kubernetes deployment is needed as part of the package."
"We are having a few problems integrating with Jira at the moment, which is something that our IT department is investigating."
"The documentation is confusing."
"Merge conflicts and repository maintenance could improve. If there is someone new to the system they would not know if there is a conflict."
"I've noticed an area for improvement in GitLab, particularly needing to go through many steps to push the code to the repository. Resolving that issue would make the product better. My team quickly fixed it by writing a small script, then double-clicking or enabling the script to take care of the issue. However, that quick fix was from my team and not the GitLab team, so in the next release, if an automatic deployment feature would be available in GitLab, then that would be good because, in Visual Studio, you can do that with just one click of a button."
"GitLab could improve by having more plugins and better user-friendliness."
"The documentation should be better. It should be very easy to call REST APIs, and the documentation has to be perfect for that."
GitLab is ranked 1st in Build Automation with 70 reviews while Inedo BuildMaster is ranked 21st in Build Automation with 1 review. GitLab is rated 8.6, while Inedo BuildMaster is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of GitLab writes "Powerful, mature, and easy to set up and manage". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Inedo BuildMaster writes "Deployment agent that allows us to deploy out to various other servers but doesn't provide build automation". GitLab is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Bamboo, AWS CodePipeline, SonarQube and Tekton, whereas Inedo BuildMaster is most compared with .
See our list of best Build Automation vendors.
We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
