GitGuardian Public Monitoring vs Trend Micro Cloud App Security comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between GitGuardian Public Monitoring and Trend Micro Cloud App Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Application Security Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed GitGuardian Public Monitoring vs. Trend Micro Cloud App Security Report (Updated: May 2024).
770,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"One thing I really like about it is the fact that we can add search words or specific payloads inside the tool, and GitGuardian will look into GitHub and alert us if any of these words is found in a repository... With this capability in the tool, we have good surveillance over our potential blind spots.""The Explore function is valuable for finding specific things I'm looking for."

More GitGuardian Public Monitoring Pros →

"It has more intelligence features than other vendors.""The initial setup is pretty straightforward.""The most valuable feature of Trend Micro Cloud App Security is its stability across all platforms.""The solution is easy to integrate.""Trend Micro has DLP features in it, which separates it from other solutions.""Dependable with ease of integration with other security products.""Trend Micro Cloud App is easy to use and easy to install.""Our business emails are very important and Trend Micro Cloud App Security has provided a high level of protection. Additionally, there are updating the solution frequently."

More Trend Micro Cloud App Security Pros →

Cons
"I'm excited about the possibility of Public Postman scanning being integrated with GitGuardian in the future. Additionally, I'm interested in exploring the potential use of honeytokens, which seems like a compelling approach to lure and identify attackers.""I would like to see improvement in some of the user interface features... When one secret is leaked in multiple files or multiple repositories, it will appear on the dashboard. But when you click on that secret, all the occurrences will appear on the page. It would be better to have one secret per occurrence, directly, so that we don't have to click to get to the list of all the occurrences."

More GitGuardian Public Monitoring Cons →

"The price of the solution could improve by being lower.""Documentation could be improved; product cost is quite high.""There is room for improvement in the DLP component of Trend Micro Cloud App Security.""They should provide separate corporate-level licenses for two to three instances.""The granulation of the policy setup needs to be better. Right now, it is too basic.""The solution's technical support services could be better.""It would be great if Trend Mail Cloud App Security would be joined with a web security solution, making it a multiple-network solution.""In the next release, I would like to see the cost go down."

More Trend Micro Cloud App Security Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It's a bit expensive, but it works well. You get what you pay for."
  • More GitGuardian Public Monitoring Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The cost of the license is on the high side. It's a yearly subscription."
  • "The price of Trend Micro Cloud App Security is expensive for regular users. There are not any hidden fees. First-time users of the solution should purchase implementation packages or professional services."
  • "The solution's price is mid-ranged."
  • "The product's pricing is reasonable compared to other vendors."
  • "The pricing of the solution could be better."
  • More Trend Micro Cloud App Security Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    770,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The Explore function is valuable for finding specific things I'm looking for.
    Top Answer:It's a bit expensive, but it works well. You get what you pay for. You get something that is fully managed with a lot of features, and a tool that is very efficient.
    Top Answer:I'm excited about the possibility of Public Postman scanning being integrated with GitGuardian in the future. Additionally, I'm interested in exploring the potential use of honeytokens, which seems… more »
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of Trend Micro Cloud App Security is its stability across all platforms.
    Top Answer:There is room for improvement in the DLP component of Trend Micro Cloud App Security. It currently feels very American-centric, and I would like to see better integration with Microsoft's traditional… more »
    Top Answer:We use Trend Micro Cloud App Security to enhance the security of our cloud systems, including Microsoft 365, SharePoint, Teams, and email clients. While our primary focus is on malware and ransomware… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    237
    Comparisons
    97
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    1,292
    Rating
    9.0
    Views
    69
    Comparisons
    12
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    395
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    GitGuardian
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    GitGuardian Public Monitoring allows real-time GitHub scanning and alerting to uncover sensitive company information hiding in online repositories. It monitors both organization repositories and developers' personal repositories. The solution gives visibility to developers and security teams on this very critical blindspot that are the organization developers' personal repositories on GitHub (80% of leaked corporate secrets on public GitHub come from developers’ personal repositories).

    GitGuardian Public Monitoring is particularly interesting for companies with large development teams (above 200 developers) and modern development practices.

    GitGuardian Public Monitoring cover 350+ API providers, database connection strings, private keys, certificates, usernames and passwords and intellectual property. It uses sophisticated pattern matching techniques to detect credentials that cannot be strictly defined with a distinctive pattern (like unprefixed credentials). The algorithm has a high precision (91% “true positive” feedback following our alerts, as reported by our users.)

    The alerting is done in real-time (a few seconds after the secret was publicly exposed) which allows fast remediation involving in a collaborative way developers, security teams and operations.

    GitGuardian Public Monitoring also allows red teams and pentesters to proactively look for sensitive information by performing complex queries on 12 billion documents and metadata from more than 3 years of GitHub history.

    GitGuardian Public Monitoring scans public GitHub activity in real-time, helping organizations detect sensitive information leaks in source code repositories. Our solution gives Threat Intelligence and Security teams full visibility over their organization’s public GitHub Attack Surface, by monitoring both organization-owned repositories and developers' personal repositories.

    With 80% of secrets and credentials leaks on public GitHub finding their source in developers' personal repositories, GitGuardian for Public Monitoring helps organizations address a critical security blind spot.

    With real-time incident notification, Threat Intelligence and Security teams are guaranteed to reach the incident scene before everyone else and take action to mitigate the threat of breaches and intrusions.

    Advanced threat and data protection for Microsoft Office 365, Google G Suite, and cloud file-sharing services

    Sample Customers
    Align Technology, Automox, Fred Hutch, Instacart, Maven Wave, Mirantis, SafetyCulture, Snowflake, Talend
    MedImpact Healthcare Systems, ClubCorp USA, Copa Airlines, Aava, Azra Solutions, BSN INET Co, Ltd, Carhartt
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization63%
    Computer Software Company6%
    Government3%
    Real Estate/Law Firm3%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business63%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise25%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business10%
    Midsize Enterprise71%
    Large Enterprise19%
    Buyer's Guide
    GitGuardian Public Monitoring vs. Trend Micro Cloud App Security
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about GitGuardian Public Monitoring vs. Trend Micro Cloud App Security and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    770,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    GitGuardian Public Monitoring is ranked 27th in Application Security Tools with 2 reviews while Trend Micro Cloud App Security is ranked 25th in Application Security Tools with 8 reviews. GitGuardian Public Monitoring is rated 9.0, while Trend Micro Cloud App Security is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of GitGuardian Public Monitoring writes "Helps us prioritize remediation tasks efficiently, improves our overall security visibility, and is effective in detecting and alerting us to security leaks quickly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Micro Cloud App Security writes "A straightforward setup and good reliability with useful security capabilities". GitGuardian Public Monitoring is most compared with Snyk, whereas Trend Micro Cloud App Security is most compared with Forcepoint ZT CDR (Zero Trust Content Disarm & Reconstruction), Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP), WithSecure Cloud Protection for Salesforce, Joe Sandbox Ultimate and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint. See our GitGuardian Public Monitoring vs. Trend Micro Cloud App Security report.

    See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.