We performed a comparison between GitGuardian Public Monitoring and McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."One thing I really like about it is the fact that we can add search words or specific payloads inside the tool, and GitGuardian will look into GitHub and alert us if any of these words is found in a repository... With this capability in the tool, we have good surveillance over our potential blind spots."
"The Explore function is valuable for finding specific things I'm looking for."
"The most valuable feature of McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is data loss prevention."
"The solution is stable."
"The tool focuses on endpoints rather than networks. Endpoints cover everything. It wouldn't be possible to steal confidential information from endpoints."
"The product provides us with an excellent, dependable solution to recommend to clients for their security needs."
"The ability to block all USBs from the McAfee portal has been great."
"You can manage your compliance in line with legislation such as GDPR and POPIA."
"Offers some good protection features."
"I am impressed with the tool's firewalls and web protection."
More McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention Pros →
"I would like to see improvement in some of the user interface features... When one secret is leaked in multiple files or multiple repositories, it will appear on the dashboard. But when you click on that secret, all the occurrences will appear on the page. It would be better to have one secret per occurrence, directly, so that we don't have to click to get to the list of all the occurrences."
"I'm excited about the possibility of Public Postman scanning being integrated with GitGuardian in the future. Additionally, I'm interested in exploring the potential use of honeytokens, which seems like a compelling approach to lure and identify attackers."
"I would like the solution to improve the AI features for anti-virus detection. I also want the software to include a tool for malware detection."
"The solution needs an easier integration in heterogeneous and dynamic environments."
"The pricing is high for licensing and support and the GUI interface is good but could use updating."
"The user interface is messy and could be simplified."
"We need to do a lot of configuration."
"The solution needs to be a one-stop protection shop. And yet, the DLP isn't strong. Anyone can break it quite easily."
"McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention could improve by having artificial intelligence."
"The initial setup is very complex."
More McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention Cons →
More GitGuardian Public Monitoring Pricing and Cost Advice →
More McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →
GitGuardian Public Monitoring is ranked 17th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 2 reviews while McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is ranked 9th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 29 reviews. GitGuardian Public Monitoring is rated 9.0, while McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of GitGuardian Public Monitoring writes "Helps us prioritize remediation tasks efficiently, improves our overall security visibility, and is effective in detecting and alerting us to security leaks quickly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention writes "Highly beneficial DLP functionality, full system protection, and useful file scanning". GitGuardian Public Monitoring is most compared with Snyk, whereas McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is most compared with HP Wolf Security, Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention, Cisco Secure Endpoint and Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention. See our GitGuardian Public Monitoring vs. McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention report.
See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.
We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.