Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs Interface Masters NPB comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Gigamon Deep Observability ...
Ranking in Network Packet Broker (NPB)
1st
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
9
Ranking in other categories
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (39th), Event Monitoring (10th), Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (31st), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (42nd), Web Application Firewall (WAF) (30th), Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (24th), Network Detection and Response (NDR) (17th)
Interface Masters NPB
Ranking in Network Packet Broker (NPB)
15th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Network Packet Broker (NPB) category, the mindshare of Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline is 26.8%, down from 33.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Interface Masters NPB is 0.9%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Packet Broker (NPB) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline26.8%
Interface Masters NPB0.9%
Other72.3%
Network Packet Broker (NPB)
 

Featured Reviews

TN
Senior Relationship Banker at Joint stock Commercial Bank for Foreign Trade of V
Experience boosts operational efficiency while performance sees room for improvement
I don't have specific information on whether it was purchased on the AWS marketplace or somewhere else. I am working with Dynatrace Operator. I am also working with Algosec, Alluvio, CrowdStrike, Firemon, Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline, and other solutions. I think it's a good tool, and I am satisfied with it. We have not stored cloud workloads with Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline yet; we are still on-premises. The technical support takes about one to two hours to respond, which is acceptable. I am satisfied with the scalability of the product. The interface is good.
Use Interface Masters NPB?
Leave a review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Packet Broker (NPB) solutions are best for your needs.
879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
12%
Healthcare Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise5
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline?
The most valuable feature for improving network visibility with Gigamon is the packet filtering capability.
What needs improvement with Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline?
Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline needs to improve its performance. I face issues with performance because we use SPAN, and the SPAN traffic is not good. They need to improve their performance.
What is your primary use case for Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline?
I am working with Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline and Firemon, and I have been working with it for a year.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Gigamon, GigaSecure
No data available
 

Overview

Information not available
 

Sample Customers

Amica Insurance, College of William & Mary, Gamma, IntercontinentalExchange, OppenheimerFunds
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs. Observer GigaStor and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.