Find out in this report how the two Patch Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
It needs improvement in response time and addressing feature requests promptly.
I would evaluate Tenable Vulnerability Management's customer service and technical support as average.
They can seamlessly scale the number of endpoints from 100 to 1,000,000 in a day.
The stability is commendable, and I would rate Tenable ten out of ten.
I have faced no stability issues with Tenable.
They should also accelerate the process of implementing new features upon request.
I would suggest HP WebInspect as a better option than Tenable.io.
Tenable charges around $40 per device, while Rapid7 costs $10 to $15 per device.
Tenable enables vulnerability management through potential AI integration that consolidates efforts and resolves multiple vulnerabilities simultaneously.
The best features of Tenable Vulnerability Management are flexibility, breadth and scope, and the fact that their current vulnerabilities come out, and they have tests for them within a day or two.
It provides survivability benefits. It helps me understand if the system is capable of withstanding certain levels of stress.
GFI LanGuard enables complete patch management of security and non-security patches to Microsoft operating systems, Mac OS X, major Linux distributions and third-party applications. It can also automate patching for all major web browsers too.
Managed in the cloud and powered by Tenable Nessus, Tenable Vulnerability Management (formerly Tenable.io) provides the industry's most comprehensive vulnerability coverage with real-time continuous assessment of your organization. Built-in prioritization, threat intelligence and real-time insight help you understand your exposures and proactively prioritize remediations.
We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
