OpenText UFT One and Galen Framework are competing in the automated testing domain. OpenText UFT One holds an advantage with its comprehensive support offerings and extensive platform compatibility, whereas Galen Framework justifies its cost with unique visual testing features.
Features: OpenText UFT One includes extensive platform compatibility, support for various testing environments, and a strong emphasis on integration and end-to-end functional testing. Galen Framework is tailored for layout and visual testing, making it ideal for responsive design testing and unique in visual testing scenarios.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText UFT One offers a managed deployment process with extensive support services, ensuring a smoother implementation. Galen Framework, being open-source, allows flexibility in deployment but requires more technical expertise, with community-driven customer service.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText UFT One involves higher upfront costs supported by extensive capabilities and support, leading to substantial ROI. Galen Framework presents a lower cost entry, resulting in a faster ROI for projects focused on UI and layout testing.
Layout testing seemed always a complex task. Galen Framework offers a simple solution: test location of objects relatively to each other on page. Using a special syntax and comprehensive rules you can describe any layout you can imagine.
Galen Framework runs well in Selenium Grid. You can set up your tests to run in a cloud like Sauce Labs or BrowserStack so that you can even test your responsive websites on different mobile devices. Galen can run multiple tests in parallel which is also a nice time saver.
Galen Framework is designed with responsivness in mind. It is easy to set up a test for different browser sizes. Galen just opens a browser, resizes it to a defined size and then tests the page according to specifications.
Our AI-powered functional testing tool accelerates test automation. It works across desktop, web, mobile, mainframe, composite, and packaged enterprise-grade applications.
Read white paper
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
