Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Fujitsu Primergy BX900 Series vs NEC Sigmablade-M comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Fujitsu Primergy BX900 Series
Ranking in Blade Servers
15th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
NEC Sigmablade-M
Ranking in Blade Servers
21st
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Blade Servers category, the mindshare of Fujitsu Primergy BX900 Series is 2.4%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NEC Sigmablade-M is 1.1%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Blade Servers Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Fujitsu Primergy BX900 Series2.4%
NEC Sigmablade-M1.1%
Other96.5%
Blade Servers
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco and others in Blade Servers. Updated: February 2026.
884,797 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Also Known As

Primergy BX900 Series
Sigmablade-M
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Yokogawa Electric Corporation, Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute International(ATR), Yamagata University, Universiti Putra Malaysia, China Telecom, Badan Informasi Geospasial
Sysmex Shanghai
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco and others in Blade Servers. Updated: February 2026.
884,797 professionals have used our research since 2012.