Fujitsu Primergy BX900 Series vs Hitachi BladeSymphony [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Fujitsu Primergy BX900 Series and Hitachi BladeSymphony [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers.
To learn more, read our detailed Blade Servers Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
14th
out of 22 in Blade Servers
Views
170
Comparisons
138
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In Blade Servers
Buyer's Guide
Blade Servers
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Primergy BX900 Series
BladeSymphony
Learn More
Overview

The Fujitsu Server PRIMERGY BX900 S2 chassis is the rock-solid foundation for Fujitsu's blade ecosystem, providing a reliable, flexible and efficient platform for building a converged infrastructure. The system provides a modular approach to create an IT infrastructure. The chassis includes all needed infrastructure elements such as power supplies and fans, networking, and management. The Fujitsu blade server is easy to upgrade, maintain and customize. Inside, you can mix and match almost any combination of server storage and connection blades to run your choice of operation systems and applications.

BladeSymphony blade servers inherit its core design from Hitachi's line of highly reliable mainframe platforms bound together by a robust management software solution. BladeSymphony management solutions simplify the administration and management of BladeSymphony servers in enterprise data centers. BladeSymphony 1000 blade systems also supports Multi-Blade Symmetric Multi Processing (SMP) interconnect technology for scalable performance. Transaction recovery is supported with our N+M standby feature improving system reliability and availability. High performance and high availability features allow BladeSymphony to be utilized in small departmental office environments to large back-end enterprise data centers.

Sample Customers
Yokogawa Electric Corporation, Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute International(ATR), Yamagata University, Universiti Putra Malaysia, China Telecom, Badan Informasi Geospasial
BMW, LBBW Asset Management, Mutual and Federal, National Computing and Information Agency, Perth Radiological Clinic, Shaanxi Telecom, Swiss Federal Institute of Intellectual Property (IGE), Swisscom IT Services, Turkcell, University HealthSystem Consortium, VPS - Norwegian Central Securities, W&W Informatik GmbH
Buyer's Guide
Blade Servers
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Fujitsu Primergy BX900 Series is ranked 14th in Blade Servers while Hitachi BladeSymphony [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Blade Servers. Fujitsu Primergy BX900 Series is rated 0.0, while Hitachi BladeSymphony [EOL] is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Fujitsu Primergy BX900 Series is most compared with Dell PowerEdge M, whereas Hitachi BladeSymphony [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.