Fudo PAM vs Okta Workforce Identity comparison

Fudo Security and Okta are both solutions in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category. Fudo Security is ranked #21, while Okta is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.5. Fudo Security holds a 2.8% mindshare in PAM, compared to Okta’s 2.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Fudo Security users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Okta users who would recommend it.

Fudo PAM

Read 5 Fudo PAM reviews

950 Views
941 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Okta Workforce Identity

Read 68 Okta Workforce Identity reviews

6,504 Views
715 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Fudo PAM

Okta Workforce Identity

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 6, 2024

Okta Workforce Identity and Fudo PAM compete in the enterprise security category. Okta seems to have the upper hand due to its flexibility and scalability, while Fudo stands out in specialized privileged access management.

Features: Okta Workforce Identity is recognized for seamless integration with various applications, strong multi-factor authentication, and robust security features. Fudo PAM’s notable features include detailed session monitoring, risk-based authentication, and specialized access management, particularly suited for organizations with rigorous security demands.

Room for Improvement: Users expect enhancements in Okta’s logging capabilities, better adaptability to diverse IT environments, and improved user interface. Fudo users point to a need for a more intuitive setup process, enhanced reporting capabilities, and user-friendly interface enhancements. Both products can align better with user needs by addressing these areas.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Okta Workforce Identity offers straightforward deployment and extensive support resources, facilitating rapid implementation. Meanwhile, Fudo PAM provides detailed deployment guides but may require more technical expertise, which can impact its ease of use. Okta's proactive customer service is compared to Fudo's more reactive approach.

Pricing and ROI: Okta Workforce Identity is considered cost-effective, offering strong ROI due to competitive pricing and broad functionality. Fudo PAM, though more expensive initially, is seen as delivering significant ROI where high-security access management is crucial. These differences highlight Okta’s affordability against Fudo’s specialized value proposition.

To learn more, read our detailed Fudo PAM vs. Okta Workforce Identity Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Fudo PAM vs. Okta Workforce Identity

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,202 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fudo PAM

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

21st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Okta Workforce Identity

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

6th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (2nd), Authentication Systems (6th), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (3rd), Access Management (2nd), ZTNA as a Service (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the mindshare of Fudo PAM is 2.8%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Okta Workforce Identity is 2.9%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Privileged Access Management (PAM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Okta Workforce Identity	2.9%
Fudo PAM	2.8%
Other	94.3%

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

Featured Reviews

Oleksiy-Zaionchkovskyy

Security Solutions Architect at Netwave

Easy to install but needs to provide better server management and organization

I would like to see better server management. You have to know exactly what you're looking for to get the right server. Working with 100 or 200 server installations is comfortable, but not thousands. The scalability isn't very good because it's complicated. I would like more organization. For instance, they could add a table that matches an account to many servers at once. There could also be better education services. They don't have any certification program, at least in Ukraine, so the training is complicated and divided into different pieces. Cisco, for example, has a great education program that starts from the basics and progresses to advanced features.

Read full review

SumitMundik

Lead Admin Systems at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Authentication process improves security with quick and intuitive user interface

The best feature is the speed and execution of Okta Workforce Identity. The moment you click on single sign-on, you immediately get the notification on your mobile phone, then you do the authentication and within a second you get authenticated. The entire customer experience is very good. The user interface is pretty simple, straightforward, and really good. Multi-factor authentication in Okta Workforce Identity is very useful so people who do not have access or are trying to access using just a user ID and password will be completely blocked because of this two-factor authentication. You will get the code, and as your device is authorized in the system, only that device can be used for the authentication purpose. A third person trying to access or hack your data will not be able to do that anymore. Additionally, you don't have to remember your passwords going forward. Previously, every 60 days or 90 days, passwords kept changing. With the two-factor authentication or single sign-on option in Okta Workforce Identity, you don't have to remember it anymore or write down passwords in plain text. If something goes wrong, we have the IAM team which can unlock your account immediately if you have issues.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Session recording and password management are the two main aspects."

"We are convinced that Fudo PAM is better than competing products like WALLIX."

"it's perfect to control and administer computers in our company."

"The main benefit of the solution is that it's very easy to set up. It only takes a couple of hours to install everything."

"Fudo PAM was the most flexible and intuitive interface out of all of the products in the PAM sector."

"Okta Workforce Identity is easy to use and has a lot of components."

"It is dependent on the evolution of your user base. It depends on usage per user, so the more sign-ins there are, the more expensive it becomes, so it works best for smaller companies from a financial perspective."

"We find the solution to be reliable for our customers and it is nice that it is cloud-based and can be accessed from anywhere."

"The most valuable feature is the identity access authentication."

"The feature that is most valuable to me is the automated user provisioning that we set up using Okta as a major part of that process."

"The most useful features of Okta for my organization are identity and access management, single sign-on, and the flexibility for hybrid setups."

"It's easy to use and straightforward."

"Okta integrates well with other solutions. Once you have integrated an application into Okta and onboarded a user, they will be onboarded for just-in-time provisioning."

More Okta Workforce Identity pros

Cons

"The stability is not very good."

"I would like to see better server management. You have to know exactly what you're looking for to get the right server."

"Fudo PAM’s scalability is not very strong."

"The configuration is difficult."

"Professional training and certification would be great."

"The training is too costly."

"Its pricing needs improvement."

"We have experienced some challenges in integrating this solution with Scope and Cognito."

"There is no proper documentation on integrating test cases with Okta, and this issue is troubling whenever I try to implement it."

"Therefore, if you have 10 million users, that's almost 100 million, so it is costly."

"If that phone or device gets stolen, somebody else can log into the system using that code."

"The stability could be better."

"The lifecycle management part can be improved. It should also have identity governance and the ability to choose a specific factor authentication at the application level. Its licensing and pricing can also be improved."

More Okta Workforce Identity cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is great. We've been given discounts that make it cheaper than using any other solution."

"This is an expensive solution but the security makes it worthwhile."

"Okta has fairly competitive pricing."

"I believe it competes well. The pricing is pretty competitive. I know that Microsoft also provides something similar with its MFA and identity services."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"Though I don't know about the licensing model of the product, I wouldn't be surprised if Okta offers a per user license subscription model."

"The pricing for Okta Workforce Identity could still be improved or made cheaper. It costs from 50 to 100 euros a year per user. Okta Workforce Identity has different packages you can choose from, and my previous company had all of them, particularly the full Okta suite."

"The cost per user for this solution is really high and could be reduced."

"The price of Okta Workforce Identity is competitively priced. We pay annually for the use of the solution."

More Okta Workforce Identity pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,202 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Government

13%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	30
Midsize Enterprise	16
Large Enterprise	32

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Okta Workforce Identity?

Okta has introduced the Universal Directory. It has custom attribute capability and user permissions to read/write on their profiles or hide them. Profile sources and identity profile sourcing are ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Okta Workforce Identity?

Pricing for Okta is reasonably not that much, however, I don't have access to the commercial aspect.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Okta Workforce Identity?

Currently, in Okta Workforce Identity we get the two-digit authentication code. Instead of getting the two-digit authentication code, if we had an option to do fingerprint verification, that would ...

See all answers

Comparisons

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs Fudo PAM

Compared 22% of the time

WALLIX Bastion vs Fudo PAM

Compared 15% of the time

Teleport vs Fudo PAM

Compared 14% of the time

ManageEngine PAM360 vs Fudo PAM

Compared 13% of the time

One Identity Safeguard vs Fudo PAM

Compared 10% of the time

More Fudo PAM Competitors

Microsoft Entra ID vs Okta Workforce Identity

Compared 17% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Okta Workforce Identity

Compared 14% of the time

Saviynt vs Okta Workforce Identity

Compared 8% of the time

Google Cloud Identity vs Okta Workforce Identity

Compared 7% of the time

Auth0 vs Okta Workforce Identity

Compared 2% of the time

More Okta Workforce Identity Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

September 2025

Download Fudo PAM product report

Buyer's Guide

Okta Workforce Identity

September 2025

Download Okta Workforce Identity product report

Also Known As

Fudo Privileged Access Management

No data available

Overview

We are the leading vendor of innovative IT security solutions. We focus on privileged access management and privileged session monitoring, combined under the Fudo Security brand. The Fudo product line merges innovation and an intuitive user experience with strong security features. These are the hallmarks of the future designs of the company.

Fudo Security

Okta Workforce Identity is a comprehensive identity and access management (IAM) solution designed to enhance security and streamline user experiences for businesses of all sizes. As a cloud-based platform, it offers a suite of tools that simplify user authentication, authorization, and management across a variety of applications and services.

Core Features

Single Sign-On (SSO): Enables users to access multiple applications with a single set of credentials, enhancing convenience and reducing password fatigue.
Adaptive Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA): Provides robust security by requiring additional verification factors, which can adapt based on the user's location, device, and behavior.
Lifecycle Management: Automates user account creation, updating, and deactivation, ensuring access rights are current and compliant with company policies.
Universal Directory: A centralized directory service that supports user and group management across various applications, simplifying administrative tasks.
API Access Management: Safeguards APIs by implementing policies that control how and when they can be accessed, which is crucial for protecting sensitive data.

PeerSpot users often praise Okta Workforce Identity for its ease of use and robust security features. IT professionals appreciate the streamlined integration with numerous applications and the flexibility in configuring access policies. Business executives value the enhanced security posture and the ability to enforce compliance across their digital assets.

For IT professionals, Okta Workforce Identity offers a scalable and efficient solution to manage user identities and access rights. The ability to automate routine tasks like user provisioning and deactivation significantly reduces administrative overhead, allowing IT teams to focus on more strategic initiatives. Furthermore, the platform's comprehensive reporting capabilities aid in monitoring and auditing access, which is critical for maintaining security and compliance.

Business executives will find that Okta Workforce Identity aligns with broader organizational goals of operational efficiency and risk management. Its intuitive user experience minimizes disruptions to workforce productivity, while advanced security features like adaptive MFA help mitigate the risk of data breaches. The platform's cloud-based nature ensures scalability and agility, enabling businesses to adapt quickly to changing market conditions and workforce dynamics.

Okta Workforce Identity stands out as a versatile and secure IAM solution, adept at meeting the complex needs of modern enterprises. Its combination of user-friendly features and robust security measures makes it a top choice for organizations aiming to streamline their identity management processes while bolstering their cybersecurity defenses.

Okta

Sample Customers

KFC, BP, Santander, Burger King, ING, Starbucks, Yahoo, DHL

FedEx, Zoom, Takeda, Lululemon Athletica, GrunHub, jetBlue, McKensson, Bain & Company, Engie, Peloton, Sonos, T-Mobile, Hewlett Packard, MGM Resorts, Ally Financial, Priceline, Albertsons, Itercom, Classy, FICO, Kensho, Live Nation, Drata, Rotary, and others.

Buyer's Guide

Fudo PAM vs. Okta Workforce Identity

September 2025

Free Report: Fudo PAM vs. Okta Workforce Identity

Find out what your peers are saying about Fudo PAM vs. Okta Workforce Identity and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,202 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fudo PAM vs. Okta Workforce Identity report.

See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.