Fudo PAM vs Okta Workforce Identity comparison

Fudo Security and Okta are both solutions in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category. Fudo Security is ranked #20, while Okta is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.3. Fudo Security holds a 2.8% mindshare in PAM, compared to Okta’s 2.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Fudo Security users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Okta users who would recommend it.

Fudo PAM

Read 5 Fudo PAM reviews

1,011 Views
1,001 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Okta Workforce Identity

Read 68 Okta Workforce Identity reviews

6,876 Views
756 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Fudo PAM

Okta Workforce Identity

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 6, 2024

Okta Workforce Identity and Fudo PAM compete in the enterprise security category. Okta seems to have the upper hand due to its flexibility and scalability, while Fudo stands out in specialized privileged access management.

Features: Okta Workforce Identity is recognized for seamless integration with various applications, strong multi-factor authentication, and robust security features. Fudo PAM’s notable features include detailed session monitoring, risk-based authentication, and specialized access management, particularly suited for organizations with rigorous security demands.

Room for Improvement: Users expect enhancements in Okta’s logging capabilities, better adaptability to diverse IT environments, and improved user interface. Fudo users point to a need for a more intuitive setup process, enhanced reporting capabilities, and user-friendly interface enhancements. Both products can align better with user needs by addressing these areas.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Okta Workforce Identity offers straightforward deployment and extensive support resources, facilitating rapid implementation. Meanwhile, Fudo PAM provides detailed deployment guides but may require more technical expertise, which can impact its ease of use. Okta's proactive customer service is compared to Fudo's more reactive approach.

Pricing and ROI: Okta Workforce Identity is considered cost-effective, offering strong ROI due to competitive pricing and broad functionality. Fudo PAM, though more expensive initially, is seen as delivering significant ROI where high-security access management is crucial. These differences highlight Okta’s affordability against Fudo’s specialized value proposition.

To learn more, read our detailed Fudo PAM vs. Okta Workforce Identity Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Fudo PAM vs. Okta Workforce Identity

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fudo PAM

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

20th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Okta Workforce Identity

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

6th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (2nd), Authentication Systems (6th), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (3rd), Access Management (4th), ZTNA as a Service (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the mindshare of Fudo PAM is 2.8%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Okta Workforce Identity is 2.9%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

Featured Reviews

Oleksiy-Zaionchkovskyy

Security Solutions Architect at Netwave

Easy to install but needs to provide better server management and organization

I would like to see better server management. You have to know exactly what you're looking for to get the right server. Working with 100 or 200 server installations is comfortable, but not thousands. The scalability isn't very good because it's complicated. I would like more organization. For instance, they could add a table that matches an account to many servers at once. There could also be better education services. They don't have any certification program, at least in Ukraine, so the training is complicated and divided into different pieces. Cisco, for example, has a great education program that starts from the basics and progresses to advanced features.

Read full review

Tor Nordhagen

Executive Director at Semaphore

Extremely easy to work with, simple to set up, and reasonably priced

The drawback of this solution is that in our shops, many staff members sometimes have to be borrowed from one shop to another and the solution does not really support having multiple roles. The user experience we would like to have when a person works in shop A which pays their salary is that they should have access to pretty much everything. Maybe you have somebody who is a manager in that shop A, he should be able to order new wear, he should be able to change the pricing, he should be able to empty the cash registry, and ship it to the bank. But when for instance, in COVID, people had to fill in for people in shops where a lot of people were sick, then they had to actually use user accounts of people that work in shop B. If you were employed in shop A, you could not work in shop B without borrowing somebody else's user ID and password. Which is really bad. We haven't been able to work around that and Okta Workforce Identity does not have a solution for it. We are now piloting their identity governance solution. Obviously, it's easy to give somebody access, give them an account, and give them roles, but it's hard to maintain that. For example, if you moved from, say working in a shop to working in a warehouse. But why do you still have all this shop access? The solution has until now not had anything to really support the process of taking away access. But now we are in a better release program of Okta's identity governance solution. Although it's very basic, the solution has started on a journey, but identity governance is something that Okta Workforce Identity really needs to improve. The ability or the options in the solution for changing the look and feel are not good enough because in our partner portal, essentially what they have is an ugly admin interface. The admin interface is good enough for us technical people because that's all we need. We work with the product and we're able to see the data but when it comes to presenting the service portal, Okta Workforce Identity does not have any capabilities really for making it look pretty. To add branding and different graphical user interface elements than Okta basic for essentially delegated admin for the business-to-business portal is horrifying because you're essentially using the tech admin. The only option we had and used, was to take the tech admin console and strip it. so that a vendor that has some goods that are sold in the shops, when they want to add a user on their side, say a driver or a packer on their side who should know how much they've packed in a truck to come to our warehouse, then the user interface that this vendor is using, these functional people will then have to use an extremely basic user interface.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Fudo PAM was the most flexible and intuitive interface out of all of the products in the PAM sector."

"Session recording and password management are the two main aspects."

"The main benefit of the solution is that it's very easy to set up. It only takes a couple of hours to install everything."

"We are convinced that Fudo PAM is better than competing products like WALLIX."

"it's perfect to control and administer computers in our company."

"Having a single sign-on to all our applications."

"The most valuable aspects of the solution are the integration with external websites one-factor authentication."

"We find the solution to be reliable for our customers and it is nice that it is cloud-based and can be accessed from anywhere."

"It made things a lot easier, especially with passwords."

"Other than Okta being an easy and awesome integration tool, one of the best features it has is the provisioning and deprovisioning, which makes management way easier. You don't need to be too technical to understand how it works."

"We find the solution to be stable."

"The most valuable features are ease of operation and visibility."

"It is dependent on the evolution of your user base. It depends on usage per user, so the more sign-ins there are, the more expensive it becomes, so it works best for smaller companies from a financial perspective."

More Okta Workforce Identity pros

Cons

"Professional training and certification would be great."

"Fudo PAM’s scalability is not very strong."

"The stability is not very good."

"I would like to see better server management. You have to know exactly what you're looking for to get the right server."

"The configuration is difficult."

"Okta Workforce Identity can improve by having more features in governance."

"The ability or the options in the solution for changing the look and feel are not good enough because in our partner portal, essentially what they have is an ugly admin interface."

"Okta Workforce Identity could improve the support system, they are too slow."

"I would appreciate it if Okta Workforce Identity becomes more user-friendly. Its API technology is complicated. Certain applications may pose challenges in terms of integration, especially when they require IDP technologies that aren't easily codable. While I can't provide specific examples, some applications may not integrate with Okta Workforce Identity."

"In my country, there's a lot of stealing of mobile phones, and mobile phones are the authentication device through the Okta application. If someone should steal my mobile phone, which is very common in my country, he or she might have access to my company account. That's my concern."

"If that phone or device gets stolen, somebody else can log into the system using that code."

"The solution can be quite expensive."

"They also have single sign-on (SSO). When we bought Okta Workforce Identity a year and a half ago, I was also looking at SSO, but not much documentation was available for SSO. The documentation for SSO should be a little more robust for somebody who is implementing it for the first time."

More Okta Workforce Identity cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is great. We've been given discounts that make it cheaper than using any other solution."

"The solution's pricing model could be better for SMBs."

"The price of Okta Workforce Identity is competitively priced. We pay annually for the use of the solution."

"It has a yearly subscription. As compared to its competitors, it is quite expensive. It also has a complex licensing model."

"This is an expensive solution but the security makes it worthwhile."

"The product is expensive compared to other vendors."

"The product's price is high. For each feature, a certain payment is required."

"It could be a bit too pricey for small companies. Okta Workforce Identity can add a lot of benefits, but smaller companies may not have a lot of applications that need to be managed by Okta Workforce Identity. In larger organizations, there are more departments, applications, and users to manage. Okta Workforce Identity adds a bit more value to those bigger organizations. In addition to standard licensing fees, there are also additional costs for things"

"The cost per user for this solution is really high and could be reduced."

More Okta Workforce Identity pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Government

13%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Okta Workforce Identity?

Okta has introduced the Universal Directory. It has custom attribute capability and user permissions to read/write on their profiles or hide them. Profile sources and identity profile sourcing are ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Okta Workforce Identity?

Pricing for Okta is reasonably not that much, however, I don't have access to the commercial aspect.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Okta Workforce Identity?

Areas for improvement with Okta Workforce Identity would be in the governance place; for me, it is light. Okta is mostly focused on execution and runtime, which means maintaining authentication and...

See all answers

Comparisons

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs Fudo PAM

Compared 23% of the time

Teleport vs Fudo PAM

Compared 15% of the time

WALLIX Bastion vs Fudo PAM

Compared 14% of the time

ManageEngine PAM360 vs Fudo PAM

Compared 13% of the time

One Identity Safeguard vs Fudo PAM

Compared 11% of the time

More Fudo PAM Competitors

Microsoft Entra ID vs Okta Workforce Identity

Compared 21% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Okta Workforce Identity

Compared 13% of the time

Google Cloud Identity vs Okta Workforce Identity

Compared 10% of the time

Saviynt vs Okta Workforce Identity

Compared 7% of the time

Ping Identity Platform vs Okta Workforce Identity

Compared 2% of the time

More Okta Workforce Identity Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

July 2025

Download Fudo PAM product report

Buyer's Guide

Okta Workforce Identity

August 2025

Download Okta Workforce Identity product report

Also Known As

Fudo Privileged Access Management

No data available

Overview

We are the leading vendor of innovative IT security solutions. We focus on privileged access management and privileged session monitoring, combined under the Fudo Security brand. The Fudo product line merges innovation and an intuitive user experience with strong security features. These are the hallmarks of the future designs of the company.

Fudo Security

Okta Workforce Identity is a comprehensive identity and access management (IAM) solution designed to enhance security and streamline user experiences for businesses of all sizes. As a cloud-based platform, it offers a suite of tools that simplify user authentication, authorization, and management across a variety of applications and services.

Core Features

Single Sign-On (SSO): Enables users to access multiple applications with a single set of credentials, enhancing convenience and reducing password fatigue.
Adaptive Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA): Provides robust security by requiring additional verification factors, which can adapt based on the user's location, device, and behavior.
Lifecycle Management: Automates user account creation, updating, and deactivation, ensuring access rights are current and compliant with company policies.
Universal Directory: A centralized directory service that supports user and group management across various applications, simplifying administrative tasks.
API Access Management: Safeguards APIs by implementing policies that control how and when they can be accessed, which is crucial for protecting sensitive data.

PeerSpot users often praise Okta Workforce Identity for its ease of use and robust security features. IT professionals appreciate the streamlined integration with numerous applications and the flexibility in configuring access policies. Business executives value the enhanced security posture and the ability to enforce compliance across their digital assets.

For IT professionals, Okta Workforce Identity offers a scalable and efficient solution to manage user identities and access rights. The ability to automate routine tasks like user provisioning and deactivation significantly reduces administrative overhead, allowing IT teams to focus on more strategic initiatives. Furthermore, the platform's comprehensive reporting capabilities aid in monitoring and auditing access, which is critical for maintaining security and compliance.

Business executives will find that Okta Workforce Identity aligns with broader organizational goals of operational efficiency and risk management. Its intuitive user experience minimizes disruptions to workforce productivity, while advanced security features like adaptive MFA help mitigate the risk of data breaches. The platform's cloud-based nature ensures scalability and agility, enabling businesses to adapt quickly to changing market conditions and workforce dynamics.

Okta Workforce Identity stands out as a versatile and secure IAM solution, adept at meeting the complex needs of modern enterprises. Its combination of user-friendly features and robust security measures makes it a top choice for organizations aiming to streamline their identity management processes while bolstering their cybersecurity defenses.

Okta

Sample Customers

KFC, BP, Santander, Burger King, ING, Starbucks, Yahoo, DHL

FedEx, Zoom, Takeda, Lululemon Athletica, GrunHub, jetBlue, McKensson, Bain & Company, Engie, Peloton, Sonos, T-Mobile, Hewlett Packard, MGM Resorts, Ally Financial, Priceline, Albertsons, Itercom, Classy, FICO, Kensho, Live Nation, Drata, Rotary, and others.

Buyer's Guide

Fudo PAM vs. Okta Workforce Identity

July 2025

Free Report: Fudo PAM vs. Okta Workforce Identity

Find out what your peers are saying about Fudo PAM vs. Okta Workforce Identity and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fudo PAM vs. Okta Workforce Identity report.

See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.