Frontegg vs UserLock comparison

Frontegg and IS Decisions are both solutions in the Authentication Systems category. Frontegg is ranked #34, while IS Decisions is ranked #29. Frontegg holds a 1.0% mindshare in AS, compared to IS Decisions’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Frontegg users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of IS Decisions users who would recommend it.

Frontegg

Read 6 Frontegg reviews

1,592 Views
700 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

UserLock

Read 2 UserLock reviews

1,395 Views
739 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Frontegg

UserLock

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 11, 2024

UserLock and Frontegg compete in identity management and security. UserLock has an advantage in pricing and customer support, while Frontegg offers superior features.

What features are offered by UserLock in comparison to Frontegg?

UserLock provides robust identity management capabilities, ease of integration, and high reliability. Frontegg offers advanced security features, comprehensive management tools, and strong development support.

What areas of improvement can be found in UserLock in comparison to Frontegg?

UserLock users mention a need for a more intuitive setup process and better reporting capabilities. Frontegg users suggest enhancements in product documentation and improvements in real-time monitoring.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of UserLock in comparison to Frontegg?

UserLock is praised for its simple installation and good customer service. Frontegg, while easy to deploy, sometimes requires more extensive configuration. Frontegg users report exceptional customer service with faster response times.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with UserLock in comparison to Frontegg?

UserLock offers competitive pricing and cost-effectiveness, yielding good ROI. Frontegg is more expensive upfront, yet users find its features justify the cost, resulting in good ROI as well.

To learn more, read our detailed Frontegg vs. UserLock Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Frontegg vs. UserLock

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 894,738 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Frontegg

Ranking in Authentication Systems

34th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (20th), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (13th)

UserLock

Ranking in Authentication Systems

29th

Average Rating

10.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Access Management (27th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Authentication Systems category, the mindshare of Frontegg is 1.0%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UserLock is 1.0%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Authentication Systems Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
UserLock	1.0%
Frontegg	1.0%
Other	98.0%

Authentication Systems

Featured Reviews

it_user1660836

DevOps Manager at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

Gives us everything we need to ensure that our customers have a safe and reliable authentication system

It would be nice to have a export button to file with all tenants/users so that in case of a disaster we will have the option to restore the users from file. For security certifications, we need to make sure we can restore all of our products and data in minimal time. We are backing up the data using the API but it will be better to export everything to an external file so in case of a disaster or mistake from our side, we can have the option to reload all the users and assign them to the relevant tenant as fast as possible

Read full review

Bill H.

Information Technology at City Of Keizer

Affordable, easy to use, and integrates well with Active Directory

The product and service are already great as it is but if I could add one feature, I guess it would be nice to have another factor of authentication (two additional factors) like your phone and a token for example, for when people forget their phone at home. It’s not that I mind not having two factors, but I do get that question from time to time from some of our users who think it would be really useful. From what I’ve heard, they’re working on it and it should be coming in the next version so that’s great news.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Frontegg gives us everything we need to ensure that our customers have a safe and reliable authentication system in which they can also manage some of the features and roles by themself which gives them more control over their environment."

"Their developers were always willing to meet even though we are in very different time zones."

"Frontegg enabled us to worry less about parts of the system that are not unique to our product, and instead spend more time developing out key value propositions."

"We like the SSO, permissions and roles, multiple workspaces, and react login components."

"Every feature is multi-tenant by design, making different customer requests effortless to provide."

"The MFA policy via Frontegg allows us to enable/disable/enforce the Multi-Factor Authentication policy of our users and to enhance security and adhere to modern standards."

"It has Audit Log and many cool features that if we were to develop them by ourselves, it would require a lot of research and development resources. Frontegg gives us everything we need to ensure that our customers have a safe and reliable authentication system in which they can also manage some of the features and roles by themself which gives them more control over their environment."

"The admin portal layer is super useful and saves valuable front-end development time."

More Frontegg pros

"The most valuable features are two-factor authentication and real-time logon monitoring."

"We mainly implemented UserLock for multi-factor authentication, but the user login insights are also nice."

"UserLock was pretty easy to set up and simple to use, and the documentation covered everything."

"It is affordable, integrates easily with Active Directory, and is simple to install and maintain."

Cons

"We really like the ability to add the same user across tenants. From a UX perspective, the flow can be betterized."

"We're hoping to see more user management-related features, according to Frontegg's roadmap."

"It would be nice to have a backup export with all tenant/users so that in case of a mistake we can have the option to restore the users."

"The web interface is missing a way to delete a workspace. I have accidentally created a workspace and was not able to delete it."

"It would be nice to have a export button to file with all tenants/users so that in case of a disaster we will have the option to restore the users from file."

"The PHP SDK is limited."

"The web interface is missing a way to delete a workspace. I have accidentally created a workspace and was not able to delete it. It's a minor thing that should be supported."

"We really like the ability to add the same user across tenants. From a UX perspective, the flow can be betterized."

More Frontegg cons

"The product and service are already great as it is but if I could add one feature, I guess it would be nice to have another factor of authentication (two additional factors) like your phone and a token for example, for when people forget their phone at home."

"I would like to see UserLock add the ability to automatically create a group policy in Active Directory."

"I would like to see UserLock add the ability to automatically create a group policy in Active Directory. That might streamline the setup process."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"You will be hard-pressed to find better pricing."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Authentication Systems solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

15%

Construction Company

14%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8

No data available

Comparisons

Auth0 Platform vs Frontegg

Compared 16% of the time

WorkOS vs Frontegg

Compared 14% of the time

Okta Platform vs Frontegg

Compared 13% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Frontegg

Compared 9% of the time

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs Frontegg

Compared 7% of the time

More Frontegg Competitors

Microsoft Entra ID vs UserLock

Compared 16% of the time

Cisco Duo vs UserLock

Compared 14% of the time

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs UserLock

Compared 9% of the time

Aruba ClearPass vs UserLock

Compared 9% of the time

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs UserLock

Compared 8% of the time

More UserLock Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Single Sign-On (SSO)

April 2026

Download Frontegg product report

Buyer's Guide

Authentication Systems

April 2026

Download UserLock product report

Overview

Frontegg offers seamless SSO onboarding, granular role management, and robust RBAC/ABAC. It enhances security with webhooks and audit logs, supports Python and Flask, and delivers modern security with reCaptcha and MFA, all via an efficient admin console with React components.

Frontegg provides a comprehensive authentication and user management platform, facilitating quick implementation for SaaS companies with multi-tenancy needs. Its integration capabilities with Gmail and LinkedIn, coupled with granular permissions and React components, streamline frontend management. Despite minor limitations in the PHP SDK and requests for enhancements in user management and documentation, Frontegg's speed of bug fixes and transparent roadmap support development efforts, allowing organizations to focus on their core applications.

What are Frontegg's key features?

SSO: Facilitates seamless user onboarding.
Granular Roles and Permissions: Offers fine-tuned access control.
RBAC and ABAC Models: Enhances security policies.
Webhooks and Audit Logs: Improve organizational security.
Multi-tenant Design: Simplifies customer management.
Integration with Python and Flask: Eases development processes.
reCaptcha and MFA Policies: Delivers modern security standards.
React Login Components: Supports efficient user interface management.

Why should users evaluate Frontegg?

Quick Implementation: Saves time in deploying key features.
Transparent Roadmap: Aligns with development efforts.
Multi-tenancy Support: Addresses complex application needs.
Integration Capabilities: Enhances existing workflows and systems.

Many SaaS companies leverage Frontegg to incorporate user management, webhooks, and SSO efficiently. Its granular permissions and multi-tenancy support align well in industries requiring complex structures. Frontegg's integration options and agile features enable organizations to focus on their principal applications while relying on Frontegg for flexible authentication and management needs.

Frontegg

UserLock provides advanced IAM for Microsoft Active Directory environments, ensuring secure logins for corporate networks and SaaS applications across various environments, including offline or remote settings.

UserLock enhances security by integrating multi-factor authentication, single sign-on, and context-aware access controls without disrupting existing Active Directory structures. Administrators enjoy real-time visibility and control, preventing account misuse, managing user sessions effectively, and maintaining security standards for compliance requirements like ISO 27001, HIPAA, and NIS2.

What are the most important features of UserLock?

Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA): Enhances security by requiring additional verification methods.
Single Sign-On (SSO): Simplifies access across multiple applications with a single login credential.
Context-Aware Access Controls: Provides security measures based on user behavior and context.
Real-Time Monitoring: Offers live insights into user sessions to prevent unauthorized access.
Detailed Auditing and Reporting: Helps meet compliance standards with comprehensive data reports.

Which benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?

Enhanced Security: Safeguards against unauthorized access through advanced access controls.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlines IT operations by reducing the complexity of user management.
Compliance Support: Aids organizations in meeting regulatory standards seamlessly.
Adaptability: Functions effectively across hybrid and remote environments.

UserLock's implementation proves advantageous in sectors such as healthcare and finance, where strict compliance and data security are critical. Industries demanding robust access management find UserLock valuable for its ability to function seamlessly with existing IT infrastructure and protocols.

IS Decisions

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Barclays, US Department of Justice, National Bank of Kuwait, Turkish Aerospace, New York Albany School District, Regtransfers, University of Kent, Camden City School District, Oklahoma City Public Schools, Bank of Cyprus, Detran-PE: Pernambuco State Traffic Department

Buyer's Guide

Frontegg vs. UserLock

April 2026

Free Report: Frontegg vs. UserLock

Find out what your peers are saying about Frontegg vs. UserLock and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Frontegg vs. UserLock report.

See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.

We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.