We performed a comparison between froglogic Squish and Visual Studio Test Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Regression Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"froglogic Squish is one of the most desired solutions if you are having a Qt as a framework and if you are looking at GUI regression testing. froglogic is a part of Qt as a company."
"This product can work with QT applications and cross-cut from them on Windows or Mac."
"Easy to use and easily scalable."
"It is very easy to use. You can handle a lot of things together at once in one package, which is a good point for us."
"The most valuable feature has been to store all our packages in one place including SSIS packages, SQL tables, TFS and SSR."
"Visual Studio is highly powerful. It's probably the best software development tool on the market."
"What I like most about Visual Studio Test Professional is the way people publish templates and publish integration."
"I was satisfied with the support given by customer service."
"It's great for the development of .NET."
"The stability has always been very good."
"There had been a lot of improvements with froglogic Squish already. There were some scenarios in which this particular solution was available in different flavors. They have pulled everything together in one solution. There were some monitoring systems, which were missing out from the solution earlier. They have a centralized dashboard for monitoring the test cases and their execution. It's a full-blown solution, there are not many glitches in terms of something missing out of the package."
"ID could be improved with suggestions of names, variables or class."
"Visual Studio Test Professional could improve by having better integration with external databases."
"The server that we use is very slow so that is concerning for us."
"One of the problems with this solution is you need to be highly technically skilled to operate it, it is not for everyone."
"The documentation is limited."
"There are too many features with the product and I would like there to be less."
"Sometimes Visual Studio is slow. It uses a lot of resources like memory and processing power. You should optimize the performance by only installing what you need on your machine. Don't install unnecessary things that will slow your machine."
"In Visual Studio we still don't have anything which can pinpoint memory leaks on a certain code line."
Reliable GUI Test Automation that works.
Use Squish for the automation of your cross-platform desktop, mobile, embedded and web GUI tests.
Testing the user interface of today's applications is a very complex and error-prone task. Automating this task is challenging, but approached correctly very rewarding.
The Squish GUI Tester is the tool of choice for several thousand companies worldwide and a 100% cross-platform tool, features
froglogic Squish is ranked 14th in Test Automation Tools with 2 reviews while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 11th in Functional Testing Tools with 11 reviews. froglogic Squish is rated 8.6, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of froglogic Squish writes "Seamless functionality, plug-and-play installation, and highly reliable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Offers lots of features, including memory analysis and code sharing". froglogic Squish is most compared with Ranorex Studio, SmartBear TestComplete, Selenium HQ, Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence and Automation Anywhere (AA), whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with TFS, Apache JMeter, Micro Focus UFT Developer, Tricentis Tosca and Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence. See our Visual Studio Test Professional vs. froglogic Squish report.
See our list of best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Regression Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.