No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Fortra's GoAnywhere Gateway for Linux vs Porter comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Fortra's GoAnywhere Gateway...
Ranking in AWS Marketplace
476th
Average Rating
10.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Porter
Ranking in AWS Marketplace
54th
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Gateway has simplified secure deployments and has reduced installation and configuration effort
We want to know how the update process for Go Anywhere Gateway is, whether it is done normally like Fortra or if there is a different procedure. Foreign Language: (Spanish) Gateway ha simplificado las implementaciones seguras y ha reducido el esfuerzo de instalación y configuración caso de uso: Tenemos dos servidores Go Anywhere Gateway en un ambiente de pruebas y un Ambiente de Producción. mejoras a la organización: Es una muy buena solución. Nos simplifica la instalación y la configuración. funciones valiosas: La simplicidad de instalación y configuración es una característica valiosa. áreas de mejora: De momento, notamos que es muy estable y simple. uso de la solución: He utilizado la solución durante 5 años. soluciones anteriores: Siempre hemos utilizado Go Anywhere Gateway en los ambientes de Go Anywhere. costo de instalación: Es una muy buena elección en términos de precio. soluciones alternativas: Migramos del servidor on-prem y elegimos instalarlo desde el marketplace, que fue simple y rápido. otros consejos: Deseamos saber cómo es el procedimiento de actualización del Go Anywhere Gateway, si se realiza normalmente como Fortra o si hay un procedimiento diferente.
Gaurav-Bansal - PeerSpot reviewer
Support Engineer at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees
UI-driven control of container deployments has simplified client operations and built lasting trust
The best features Porter offers are very useful for situations where there are only one or two DevOps members in a team. For example, my client had limited view information on Kubernetes and only one IT engineer, so it has very fast application deployment, and they can use it through the UI without having to run kubectl and other commands through the terminal. The fast application deployment through the UI helped my team and my client because whenever they needed to scale up the containers, they did not go in and use kubectl or kube-admin commands; instead, they used the UI to scale up the application resources, allowing their applications to handle more traffic. Regarding Porter's governance and security, I think they are good; it all depends on the users and roles, and once they are configured correctly, there are no loopholes in the user permissions. Regarding Porter's accuracy and reliability of output, I think they are pretty reliable, including self-healing pods; with Porter, I can set automatic restarts, and for high availability, I can set up replicas. Porter is a reliable platform.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AWS Marketplace solutions are best for your needs.
916,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Construction Company
48%
Comms Service Provider
14%
Insurance Company
6%
Healthcare Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Fortra's GoAnywhere Gateway for Linux?
At the moment, we notice that it is very stable and simple.
What is your primary use case for Fortra's GoAnywhere Gateway for Linux?
We have two Go Anywhere Gateway servers in a test environment and a Production Environment.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Porter?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that the setup cost is good; it is not highly priced software, and for one client, I think it was a very minimal charge, making it pretty good.
What needs improvement with Porter?
I would say Porter could be a little lightweight; I felt that it is a little heavy, perhaps because it is on top of Kubernetes. I think it does not have many options for advanced Kubernetes operati...
What is your primary use case for Porter?
My main use case for Porter is to simplify Kubernetes deployment on simpler applications, and for developers, I use it to work alongside Kubernetes and leverage the automation and templates to depl...
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Dice, HailBytes, Tulip Interfaces and others in AWS Marketplace. Updated: September 2026.
916,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.