We performed a comparison between Trellix Network Detection and Response and Trend Micro Deep Discovery based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Very functional and good for detecting malicious traffic."
"The solution can scale."
"The installation phase was easy."
"Support is very helpful and responsive."
"We wanted to cross-reference that activity with the network traffic just to be sure there was no lateral movement. With Trellix, we easily confirmed that there was no lateral network involvement and that nothing else was infected. It helped us correlate the events and feel confident in our containment."
"The most valuable feature is MVX, which tests all of the files that have been received in an email."
"It allows us to be more hands off in checking on emails and networking traffic. We can set up a bunch of different alerts and have it alert us."
"Application categorization is the most valuable feature for us. Application filtering is very interesting because other products don't give you full application filtering capabilities."
"Generally speaking, it just gives us a broad understanding of exactly what kind of threats occur. The submission point, analyzing point, and virtualization are within the environment that it supports. It helped us to improve our security levels and protect our internal network from any threats outside."
"The tool's stability and performance are good."
"One of the most valuable features is the performance, since, so far, we have not faced any issues with Deep Discovery."
"I like the sales operations testing. and support."
"Trend Micro Deep Discovery is a very specific product for threat intelligence with smart protection."
"As a security product, managing threats is crucial for my clients."
"The most valuable feature of Trend Micro Deep Discovery is its complete end-to-end visibility of threats."
"It is a very good solution. It is very light, and it is quite quick to figure out the problem in your network."
"There is a lot of room for Improvement in the offering, from cost to functionality. It is pretty straightforward to implement which is an advantage. However, it falls short in pricing, detection capabilities, and, most importantly, reporting and policy management."
"It would be very helpful if there were better integration with other solutions from other vendors, such as Fortinet and Palo Alto."
"A better depth of view, being able to see deeper into the management process, is what I'd like to see."
"Based on what we deployed, they should emphasize the application filtering and the web center. We need to look deeper into the SSM inspection. If we get the full solution with that module, we don't need to get the SSM database from another supplier."
"Technical packaging could be improved."
"It is an expensive solution."
"The problem with FireEye is that they don't allow VM or sandbox customization. The user doesn't have control of the VMs that are inside the box. It comes from the vendor as-is. Some users like to have control of it. Like what type of Windows and what type of applications and they have zero control over this."
"Cybersecurity posture has room for improvement."
"The stability of the solution could be improved. It should be 100% stable, but it's not there right now."
"I would like to see them create a rule where It could integrate with the network and start mitigating with auto-detection."
"The solution could be more stable and offer more security."
"This solution could be improved with faster technical support and cheaper licensing prices."
"Trend Micro Deep Discovery's technical support could be improved, and it could be made more active."
"The solution could be more secure."
"Some of the end users may not be technically proficient, so they occasionally face problems due to a lack of knowledge."
"Scalability becomes an issue when managing a higher number of customers."
More Trellix Network Detection and Response Pricing and Cost Advice →
Trellix Network Detection and Response is ranked 9th in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) with 36 reviews while Trend Micro Deep Discovery is ranked 17th in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) with 22 reviews. Trellix Network Detection and Response is rated 8.6, while Trend Micro Deep Discovery is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Trellix Network Detection and Response writes "Offers in-depth investigation capabilities, integrates well and smoothly transitioned from a lower-capacity appliance to a higher one". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Micro Deep Discovery writes "Good threat detection capabilities and offers flexibility for hosting options". Trellix Network Detection and Response is most compared with Fortinet FortiSandbox, Palo Alto Networks WildFire, Zscaler Internet Access, Fortinet FortiGate and Vectra AI, whereas Trend Micro Deep Discovery is most compared with Darktrace, Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System, Arista NDR, Vectra AI and Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention. See our Trellix Network Detection and Response vs. Trend Micro Deep Discovery report.
See our list of best Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) vendors.
We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.